Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK more or less the same CFM of air (with a resultant HP) will have a higher EGT with the higher comp.

The TD05H-18g Jez tuned for me recently on a 9.5cr motor would start pinging once we hit 16ish psi. Pulling timing wasnt helping..... I have a feeling the 8cm IWG TD05H was just a shit balance when driving a big compressor on a high comp motor. It comes on boost very early and strong, just didnt want to take the boost.

It did make 207rwkw @ 15psi on a Mainline dyno, but hey we wanted more :whistling: It did not appear to be an issue with the way it was being tuned as I was on site watching timing and fuel trims being altered to combat the ping.

Was it super responsive with the high compression ratio of 9.5?

Was it super responsive with the high compression ratio of 9.5?

Jez can vouch, it is a very responsive setup.

Made 530nm @ 4200rpm and 207kw @ 6000rpm.

Im very curious to see what 10:1cr does, my motor is also a VCT model.

Haha come on man.

Still running besides the 150ml of oil in the sump after the sandwhich plate snapped off the block. New bearings and sat on limiter all day at wakefield.

I honestly havent checked the inj duty. My tial 44 arrived today so hoping to dyno it next week on 20+psi then off to the drags.

Nah sydney is horrid for E85, will be tuned on 98.

Thus my EGT concerns lol

Ah yes i see haha.

A mate and I used to own turbo commy V6s (yes flame on lol) and he had a stock ecotec with 9.2 compression and a GT3076 0.82 turbo. Car was fantastic made between 250-280rwkw depending on tunes and was super responsive.

Then he blew that engine and had a forged one built with 8.0 compression as per the advice of the guy building it. I said thats stupid but he trusted other guy more than me :(.

Car lost a lot of response and struggled to make 250rwkw with the turbo running hard.

I told him that he needed a GT35 and lots of boost to get the low compression engine in its element but he didnt want to loose more response. He ended up getting over it and selling it.

The higher the compression you can safely run to make your power level taking fuel into consideration is what I reckon is the best, especially for a street car.

Then I read about people putting turbos on stock M3 engines that are 11.5 compression with E85 with crazy results.

All this E85 talk :( , i'm getting tempted , i wonder what it costs for a 44gal? . Anyways , i picked up my turbo from the post office today :D i can't wait to get it all fitted , just a quick question about ext gate positioning , is it better to mount it off the exh housing or off the manifold??

I have not seen that many cars running E85 day to day. Those that I have seen running normally take forever to crank and idle like cops until warm etc if they dont foul plugs. Is there someting in the tuning of them or thats just the nature of the beast. Certainly I am yet to see an E85 powered car crank to life like on 98 and not splutter blowing sweet smelling fumes out the exhaust.

Not saying this is how it has to be...just that those I have seen have put me off it as there must be a trick to getting them nice for day to day

Mine starts identical on both E85 and 98 whether cold or hot. Although Trent from Status has tuned a heap of cars on E85 so has had a lot of experience with it. But the point is its definitely possible. My mum borrows my car and hasnt mentioned a thing lol

Right , i think i might make another thread on it soon :ph34r:

p.s artz , i'm not fussy whistling.gif

ok after a bit of a google search , E85 isn't the best choice for me , but the united 98 i was talking about a couple pages ago seems like the best compromise . link http://www.unitedpetroleum.com.au/fuels/premium-98

Edited by toffy

You can't get E85 in the UK, well you could at about 8 petrol stations then it was stopped.

There is an E5 I think though, it is the same nominal octane as the Shell 99 I use. Would E5 be better than a 99 RON (which has no ethanol)??? Both are 99RON.

You can't get E85 in the UK, well you could at about 8 petrol stations then it was stopped.

There is an E5 I think though, it is the same nominal octane as the Shell 99 I use. Would E5 be better than a 99 RON (which has no ethanol)??? Both are 99RON.

you would have to find out what the RON rating is of E5, in Australia the E10 was/is a 91RON fuel unless advertised as a Premium 98 with Ethanol which is a 98RON..

I would go with what ever has the highest RON rating

anyway back to Kando turbo's worship.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...