Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just bought a td06 20g 10cm ext. gate for my RB , what are peoples experience with using this on the standard manifold?

Is it just a matter of putting in a 12 mm flanger spacer?

Yes and you will need extended exhaust manifold > turbo studs as well.

ran this on my old 34 made 281rwkw @ 18psi.

dyno sheet is some pages back.

if i was to do it again, i'd go high mount with t67-25g

Don't get confused with ppl on NS. The T25 flange housings work mint, no issues. It's those ones that People had trouble with the actuators and nothing else.

the T3 housings with the 3 bolt dump pattern (internal gate off a truck) has proven to suck. Both BSA and another member tried and failed. One was an RB20 one a 25.

I know this thread is 11ty pages long but you actually need to read the thing if you hope to have an idea about the product.

Hi all,

Sorry if this has been covered but after 120 pages (starting at page 1) I couldn't find what I was after and have given up on searching -_-'

Quick overview - R33 RB25det S2 Stock turbo has blown, now buying everything required to get her up and running at 300rwkw+ on 98oct BP ultimate. All the other mods I am ok with (6boost manifold, 850cc injections, greddy style intake etc...) except for two things - Wastegate and Turbo Choice.

Simons write up and numerous results have made the T67 very appealing and I see it's only being released in anti-surge now; that's not the issue though haha!

I just wanted to ask anyone with a T-67, what did you do to have the turbo only running on oil feed? Did you have to weld/close up the water supply lines from the stock turbo? Isn't it better to have a water cooled turbo to keep the oil from 'coking'?

As it is, I'm torn between these two turbos:

T-67

Or

TD06

I'm finding the TD06 more appealing as it is water cooled as well as oil fed. It also seems to have close specs to the T-67 but I couldn't seem to find any recent dyno sheets of performance results. Is it closer to or further from the performance of the T-67? Is full boost still to be expected around 4000rpm from either turbo?

As for wastegates, I have a selection that are available to me and I'm wondering what's best?

(keeping in mind this will be used in conjuction with a 6boost manifold and the target goal of 300rwkw+)

GFB EX 50mm

Or

TiAL MV-R

Or

Turbosmart Hypergate 45mm 2011+ model

Many thanks in Advanced!

Thanks for the replies guys. I decided I'll probably go with a watercooled turbo which, while searching, I found this:

TD06H w/ Garrett T04R

How would this compare to the TD06SL2?

The only difference I can really find is the size of the compressor wheel and the turbine wheel. The T04R has a larger compressor wheel by 6mm and a larger turbine wheel by 6.2mm.

Would I be correct in thinking the smaller wheels on the TD06SL2 would allow the turbo to spool up slightly quicker?

Both are '400-650hp' rated so if the TD06SL2 spools quicker I'd be mad not to go for it as this will be a street build rather than track... thoughts?

Go the oil cooled only T67-25g 10cm without a surge ported front cover.... Loop or block the oil lines!

Plain bearing turbo's don't need water cooling as they hold a lot more oil which is used for cooling.

Waterlines perhaps lol? Yeah I was more inclined to get the T67 but I thought retaining water cooling would be for keeping it nice and cool. I can't seem to find any that are non anti-surge that he has for sale...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...