Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello new kid on the block - lets see if you can handle life on the track better than your Garrett and IHI buddies ;)

attachicon.gifT28-TD05H16G-PE1420.png

Got the TD05H-16G installed and running on the car today - went out for a quick road test, on wastegate boost the "1bar actuator" actually held 11psi with no adjustment. With boost control set up it made 18psi by 3700rpm on the SR20, which is pretty much as expected. About 400rpm laggier than the PE1420, but runs 1psi more boost with the same wastegate setup and certainly feels like it has more "grr". Seems like a great match for what is expected of it :)

Seems pretty good

Touch up tune should see boost response even better alil

But you won't get better boost response than the pe1420 as its much smaller even looks smaller than the t25g but should make abit more power up top and midrange aswell keen to see results

I got the td05h aswell on sr but 18g 264rwkw on e85 but full boost by 4000rpm so should be abit more responsive

Yeah if you put much stock in virtual dyno we were seeing ~220rwkw at 18psi on BP98 with the PE1420, quite a lot more on E85... very impressive turbo, but it failed. The TD05 definitely flows more, can already tell at this stage. I don't know that spool will improve drastically.

Fyi to anyone that wants to know. I put the td05 18g 8cm on my rb20. Adjustable cam gears. Forward facing plenum front mount. Splitfire coilpacks. 750cc injectors. Nistune i made 210 with full boost at 22psi by 4000rpm. Then retuned on e85 and made 241rkw. At 22psi full boost by 4k also. Road drive with both tunes. Very agressive with both tunes but i would say it starts with a better pull woth e85.

Hope this helps everyone if there is any unfinished questions. Ill try post a pic of the dyno sheet when i get a chance

anyone know the difference between the t67 t3 10cm anti-surge and the non anti-sure

also i noticed they had a t67 with a t04r wheel

trying to toss up between one of these or one of HGs for a rb25 on e85 either low or highmount ex gate for around the 330rwkw-350rwkw

anyone know the difference between the t67 t3 10cm anti-surge and the non anti-sure

also i noticed they had a t67 with a t04r wheel

trying to toss up between one of these or one of HGs for a rb25 on e85 either low or highmount ex gate for around the 330rwkw-350rwkw

FP HTA3073 for 350kw and epic response i reckon!

Not a cheap option but i can tell you, after the initial drive in mine with the HTA, ill never use another turbo! Its SO good!

Its appears that all the caste wheeled turbochargers are all in one boat, and all the billet turbochargers are in another boat with marginal differences between any of them.

That VNT turbocharger hypergear made is probably the only turbo that is different. Might be worth while waiting and get that.

Its appears that all the caste wheeled turbochargers are all in one boat, and all the billet turbochargers are in another boat with marginal differences between any of them.

That VNT turbocharger hypergear made is probably the only turbo that is different. Might be worth while waiting and get that.

Just our boat is faster and responds quicker :laugh:

i reckon the kando t67 will do same power with same boost as the fp hta but wont match the response. what the fp hta response like to the turbo hypergear are doing with the vnt cause that looks insane

i reckon the kando t67 will do same power with same boost as the fp hta but wont match the response. what the fp hta response like to the turbo hypergear are doing with the vnt cause that looks insane

So far I think the HTA3076 has made more than any of the T67s have - I could be wrong, but I haven't noticed any matching 391rwkw on a Mainline or Dyno Dynamics.

The rpm readings from the Mainline were a bit hard to work out but could tell that at 4000rpm the HTA3076 had more than the VNT, albeit not massive amounts more (and again the VNT was on a hub dyno) - and the HTA made more power peak... without the risk of having moving parts in the exhaust stream which could fail. Will be interesting to see how Stao gets on with reliability as otherwise it is pretty sweet!

So far I think the HTA3076 has made more than any of the T67s have - I could be wrong, but I haven't noticed any matching 391rwkw on a Mainline or Dyno Dynamics.

The rpm readings from the Mainline were a bit hard to work out but could tell that at 4000rpm the HTA3076 had more than the VNT, albeit not massive amounts more (and again the VNT was on a hub dyno) - and the HTA made more power peak... without the risk of having moving parts in the exhaust stream which could fail. Will be interesting to see how Stao gets on with reliability as otherwise it is pretty sweet!

yea i was going by simons but yes that was on a hub maybe ill push mine up 28 for couple runs on dyno see what it can go for comparrision were thinkin 350 on 20-21 on mainline.

Also agree i think it may run into reliability issues with moving parts it has but its a low bosst pressure for the power its making

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...