Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello new kid on the block - lets see if you can handle life on the track better than your Garrett and IHI buddies ;)

attachicon.gifT28-TD05H16G-PE1420.png

Got the TD05H-16G installed and running on the car today - went out for a quick road test, on wastegate boost the "1bar actuator" actually held 11psi with no adjustment. With boost control set up it made 18psi by 3700rpm on the SR20, which is pretty much as expected. About 400rpm laggier than the PE1420, but runs 1psi more boost with the same wastegate setup and certainly feels like it has more "grr". Seems like a great match for what is expected of it :)

Seems pretty good

Touch up tune should see boost response even better alil

But you won't get better boost response than the pe1420 as its much smaller even looks smaller than the t25g but should make abit more power up top and midrange aswell keen to see results

I got the td05h aswell on sr but 18g 264rwkw on e85 but full boost by 4000rpm so should be abit more responsive

Yeah if you put much stock in virtual dyno we were seeing ~220rwkw at 18psi on BP98 with the PE1420, quite a lot more on E85... very impressive turbo, but it failed. The TD05 definitely flows more, can already tell at this stage. I don't know that spool will improve drastically.

Fyi to anyone that wants to know. I put the td05 18g 8cm on my rb20. Adjustable cam gears. Forward facing plenum front mount. Splitfire coilpacks. 750cc injectors. Nistune i made 210 with full boost at 22psi by 4000rpm. Then retuned on e85 and made 241rkw. At 22psi full boost by 4k also. Road drive with both tunes. Very agressive with both tunes but i would say it starts with a better pull woth e85.

Hope this helps everyone if there is any unfinished questions. Ill try post a pic of the dyno sheet when i get a chance

anyone know the difference between the t67 t3 10cm anti-surge and the non anti-sure

also i noticed they had a t67 with a t04r wheel

trying to toss up between one of these or one of HGs for a rb25 on e85 either low or highmount ex gate for around the 330rwkw-350rwkw

anyone know the difference between the t67 t3 10cm anti-surge and the non anti-sure

also i noticed they had a t67 with a t04r wheel

trying to toss up between one of these or one of HGs for a rb25 on e85 either low or highmount ex gate for around the 330rwkw-350rwkw

FP HTA3073 for 350kw and epic response i reckon!

Not a cheap option but i can tell you, after the initial drive in mine with the HTA, ill never use another turbo! Its SO good!

Its appears that all the caste wheeled turbochargers are all in one boat, and all the billet turbochargers are in another boat with marginal differences between any of them.

That VNT turbocharger hypergear made is probably the only turbo that is different. Might be worth while waiting and get that.

Its appears that all the caste wheeled turbochargers are all in one boat, and all the billet turbochargers are in another boat with marginal differences between any of them.

That VNT turbocharger hypergear made is probably the only turbo that is different. Might be worth while waiting and get that.

Just our boat is faster and responds quicker :laugh:

i reckon the kando t67 will do same power with same boost as the fp hta but wont match the response. what the fp hta response like to the turbo hypergear are doing with the vnt cause that looks insane

i reckon the kando t67 will do same power with same boost as the fp hta but wont match the response. what the fp hta response like to the turbo hypergear are doing with the vnt cause that looks insane

So far I think the HTA3076 has made more than any of the T67s have - I could be wrong, but I haven't noticed any matching 391rwkw on a Mainline or Dyno Dynamics.

The rpm readings from the Mainline were a bit hard to work out but could tell that at 4000rpm the HTA3076 had more than the VNT, albeit not massive amounts more (and again the VNT was on a hub dyno) - and the HTA made more power peak... without the risk of having moving parts in the exhaust stream which could fail. Will be interesting to see how Stao gets on with reliability as otherwise it is pretty sweet!

So far I think the HTA3076 has made more than any of the T67s have - I could be wrong, but I haven't noticed any matching 391rwkw on a Mainline or Dyno Dynamics.

The rpm readings from the Mainline were a bit hard to work out but could tell that at 4000rpm the HTA3076 had more than the VNT, albeit not massive amounts more (and again the VNT was on a hub dyno) - and the HTA made more power peak... without the risk of having moving parts in the exhaust stream which could fail. Will be interesting to see how Stao gets on with reliability as otherwise it is pretty sweet!

yea i was going by simons but yes that was on a hub maybe ill push mine up 28 for couple runs on dyno see what it can go for comparrision were thinkin 350 on 20-21 on mainline.

Also agree i think it may run into reliability issues with moving parts it has but its a low bosst pressure for the power its making

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...