Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It would be more sensible to compare it to the GTX though, as they are both billet and can both run high boost efficiently. As said though, there are no direct comparisons or even decent GTX3076 results on built engines. Shame mine isn't a manual, although stock manifolds and cams will be restricting my output severely anyway.

Too many variables unfortunately, but the HTA definitely spools nicely. Lithium, can you buy the HTA 3071 chra separately by chance, and will it drop in to standard GT3071 housings?

You can buy less exhaust housing, can order with 71, 73 or 76 HTA just by simply emailing and asking.

About $2,500 landed IIRC.

Ok so I finally pulled my finger out and sorted my car out for a tune with the TD06H-25G Billet compressor. Mind you these results are on a Rb3025 Neo running 260deg cams, with BP98 and only roughly 19psi. Apparently it kept blowing a hose off at any thing higher so I need to weld a barb on it to be able to lean on it further.

post-21501-0-72293800-1369998451_thumb.jpg

Running it on 20psi proves nothing - you could think this turbo is no better than the old GT3076R aside from coming on a bit earlier at that boost level. Sure, the 28-24psi spike is going to make the midrange look artificially higher but in most cases that is actually the reason a car with a similar setup will make more torque than another, unless one has a restriction (which CAN be the turbo maxing out). If you want to see where it hits 20psi, follow the dyno plot to that point.

Also I am not at all convinced of the hub dyno vs rolling road dyno comparison being equal in this case - when we were discussing this HTA3076 upgrade I investigated lots of JEM's dyno results to get a feel for what to predict the power potential of it as, the numbers which are coming from the hub dyno in this thread and the HG one are often showing cars with stock cams etc making similar or more power per psi than what you would see at JEM's dyno with cams/head work etc. I'd be happy to be proven wrong, as I like to be able to see the wood for the trees and help EVERYONE improve their understanding of everything but I am just calling it how I see it at this stage.

running it at 20psi would give a direct and equal comparison surely, allowing the HTA to ramp up 28psi probably would effect the boost curve, can you really just follow the graph to that point and make comparisons? At 20psi , its 200rpm difference anyway, I wouldn't be surprised if the two graphs were almost identical on 20psi.. its all about the transient response it seems.

most people are interested in using a turbo for there stock motor so running it on 20psi would prove a lot..

Edited by AngryRBGTX

not 100% sure but I'm not really too worried either hahah. I can't feel it doing any thing funny, all I know is that its spinning Achillies 123S's when rolling on in 2nd and probly 3rd.

Bahaha nice, is that a 10 or 12cm?

You can buy less exhaust housing, can order with 71, 73 or 76 HTA just by simply emailing and asking.

About $2,500 landed IIRC.

You reckon that much? I would have thought it would be that WITH the housing

You reckon that much? I would have thought it would be that WITH the housing

Sorry I did mean with the housing.

Last time I emailed them it was about that much, and they were willing to discount about between 1-200 for the housing. Not enough in my eyes but oh well.

sorted my car out for a tune with the TD06H-25G Billet compressor. results are on a Rb3025 Neo running 260deg cams, with BP98

Looks like a good result. Boost falling away slightly up high, does the tuner indicate whether it simply requires a bit of fine tuning of the BC, or is the 12cm housing maybe heading towards its capacity with that combination?

Interested to hear if it ramps up progressively or comes on with a rush. Some people might not have noticed that this turbine spec is the big brother to what's fitted to the T67-25G

  • Like 1

Finally some 12cm results!

Anti surge comp cover and external gate?

Decent results for pump fuel, I've got the same turbo as yours to go on a single cam rb30 on e85 and have been looking everywhere for results.

Please share yours when the time comes also, a friend has a sideline RB30e+t which is considering similar options too.

I would say its the crappy power fc boost controller. I also just noticed that injector duty is at full nearing redline. So my 660cc injectors have to go before winding any more boost into it.

Yeah antisurge and 50mm external gate.

With the 3l it actually feels pretty dam good at how it ramps up. It might be a light switch on a smaller motor

Hope the fuel delivery woes to the injectors have been sorted and aren't contributing to the high duty cycle? The results are very promising but I'd think 660 injectors would comfortably feed 460rwhp of pump 98. Might be worth running a fuel flow test rig on the dyno to check.

I would have thought 660's should be heaps too.

I need to log the duty next time I drive it with my laptop. I only noticed it when I was looking at the hand controller and it showed the peak reading. Just prior to that I was tapping the rev limiter so it might have the last few cells set to dump in masses of fuel. The fuel issues that you mentioned, I pulled the pump out and changed the pickup point and it doesn't seem to be surging when cornering any more.

Well boys, results are in. Very happy with the way JEM has handled both me and the car. Would highly recommend them.

I forgot to grab my power run, but put simply.... 238rwkw @ 21.5psi.

Will grab the dyno sheet next week and upload. Car feels so good/fun to drive.

Thats a good result Kane :)

For years the RB20 staple was Roys 260kw, you have managed to get 238(240~) with a TD05H 18G and a standard manifold which would arguably be a punchier combo and still not giving too many killa wasps away. Plus we all know the JEM dyno is legit as they come. Awesome stuff!

I bet your stoked! Come take us for a wrap if your ever in the Liverpool area.

Scott, I work in Warwick Farm, so I'm sure we can organise something (not my daily though).

I was a little worried it wouldnt get the number I asked, and when Dean asked me what I wanted to acheive (240 on 22psi), I was stoked that it was achieved.

Keen to see the graph. Car really comes alive after 18psi.

Well boys, results are in. Very happy with the way JEM has handled both me and the car. Would highly recommend them.

I forgot to grab my power run, but put simply.... 238rwkw @ 21.5psi.

Will grab the dyno sheet next week and upload. Car feels so good/fun to drive.

Very nice result, what fuel and other mods?

Have booked the dyno to tune my mates S14 with a 8cm TD05H-Evo3 16G on flex fuel, we will go to full E85 and at this stage may go up to around 20-21psi. Will post results for that when it's done.

Do people realise (or have any thoughts) on the sentiment that the Evo3 16G is often considered to flow similar to the 18G? This fact was part of the grounds we chose the Evo16G compressor over the 18G though will soon enough know if that was folly. So far it happily pumping enough air to keep the SR20's thirst for air quenched, so seems good so far.

Also, I had previously posted ~3700rpm for full boost - that was rolling on throttle, later testing showed that it gets 19psi by 3500rpm in 3rd gear and holds power nicely past 6000rpm, compared to the old PE1420 which hit a wall before 6000rpm.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...