Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello new kid on the block - lets see if you can handle life on the track better than your Garrett and IHI buddies ;)

attachicon.gifT28-TD05H16G-PE1420.png

Got the TD05H-16G installed and running on the car today - went out for a quick road test, on wastegate boost the "1bar actuator" actually held 11psi with no adjustment. With boost control set up it made 18psi by 3700rpm on the SR20, which is pretty much as expected. About 400rpm laggier than the PE1420, but runs 1psi more boost with the same wastegate setup and certainly feels like it has more "grr". Seems like a great match for what is expected of it :)

Seems pretty good

Touch up tune should see boost response even better alil

But you won't get better boost response than the pe1420 as its much smaller even looks smaller than the t25g but should make abit more power up top and midrange aswell keen to see results

I got the td05h aswell on sr but 18g 264rwkw on e85 but full boost by 4000rpm so should be abit more responsive

Yeah if you put much stock in virtual dyno we were seeing ~220rwkw at 18psi on BP98 with the PE1420, quite a lot more on E85... very impressive turbo, but it failed. The TD05 definitely flows more, can already tell at this stage. I don't know that spool will improve drastically.

Fyi to anyone that wants to know. I put the td05 18g 8cm on my rb20. Adjustable cam gears. Forward facing plenum front mount. Splitfire coilpacks. 750cc injectors. Nistune i made 210 with full boost at 22psi by 4000rpm. Then retuned on e85 and made 241rkw. At 22psi full boost by 4k also. Road drive with both tunes. Very agressive with both tunes but i would say it starts with a better pull woth e85.

Hope this helps everyone if there is any unfinished questions. Ill try post a pic of the dyno sheet when i get a chance

anyone know the difference between the t67 t3 10cm anti-surge and the non anti-sure

also i noticed they had a t67 with a t04r wheel

trying to toss up between one of these or one of HGs for a rb25 on e85 either low or highmount ex gate for around the 330rwkw-350rwkw

anyone know the difference between the t67 t3 10cm anti-surge and the non anti-sure

also i noticed they had a t67 with a t04r wheel

trying to toss up between one of these or one of HGs for a rb25 on e85 either low or highmount ex gate for around the 330rwkw-350rwkw

FP HTA3073 for 350kw and epic response i reckon!

Not a cheap option but i can tell you, after the initial drive in mine with the HTA, ill never use another turbo! Its SO good!

Its appears that all the caste wheeled turbochargers are all in one boat, and all the billet turbochargers are in another boat with marginal differences between any of them.

That VNT turbocharger hypergear made is probably the only turbo that is different. Might be worth while waiting and get that.

Its appears that all the caste wheeled turbochargers are all in one boat, and all the billet turbochargers are in another boat with marginal differences between any of them.

That VNT turbocharger hypergear made is probably the only turbo that is different. Might be worth while waiting and get that.

Just our boat is faster and responds quicker :laugh:

i reckon the kando t67 will do same power with same boost as the fp hta but wont match the response. what the fp hta response like to the turbo hypergear are doing with the vnt cause that looks insane

i reckon the kando t67 will do same power with same boost as the fp hta but wont match the response. what the fp hta response like to the turbo hypergear are doing with the vnt cause that looks insane

So far I think the HTA3076 has made more than any of the T67s have - I could be wrong, but I haven't noticed any matching 391rwkw on a Mainline or Dyno Dynamics.

The rpm readings from the Mainline were a bit hard to work out but could tell that at 4000rpm the HTA3076 had more than the VNT, albeit not massive amounts more (and again the VNT was on a hub dyno) - and the HTA made more power peak... without the risk of having moving parts in the exhaust stream which could fail. Will be interesting to see how Stao gets on with reliability as otherwise it is pretty sweet!

So far I think the HTA3076 has made more than any of the T67s have - I could be wrong, but I haven't noticed any matching 391rwkw on a Mainline or Dyno Dynamics.

The rpm readings from the Mainline were a bit hard to work out but could tell that at 4000rpm the HTA3076 had more than the VNT, albeit not massive amounts more (and again the VNT was on a hub dyno) - and the HTA made more power peak... without the risk of having moving parts in the exhaust stream which could fail. Will be interesting to see how Stao gets on with reliability as otherwise it is pretty sweet!

yea i was going by simons but yes that was on a hub maybe ill push mine up 28 for couple runs on dyno see what it can go for comparrision were thinkin 350 on 20-21 on mainline.

Also agree i think it may run into reliability issues with moving parts it has but its a low bosst pressure for the power its making

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
    • Yes then it will turn on but I want the car features to work  
    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
×
×
  • Create New...