Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I asked this in the past, but people misunderstood my question and kept recommending V8s due to their ability to put power down regardless of the where the revs are at. I previously asked at any time, which car provides the highest acceleration. What I meant was at any speed, any time and any car, which SINGLE point will have your eye balls being sucked into the back of your head more than any other.

e.g:

A worked GTR launching from stand still.

A 1000hp Supra the moment it comes onto boost from say... 20kph.

A lightweight snappy Silvia from a rolling start.

An Evo shooting from 30kph.

I dunno, I'm just making shit up, but what car (within a reasonable budget, no Veyrons etc) will achieve the highest acceleration G's at any one moment. Reason I'm asking is because my mate just bought a stock Evo, and its quick, crazy quick, at least it feels that way. I know there are faster cars out there, I've been in them, but they just don't feel as quick. IMO the seat sucking feeling of raw high G acceleration is one of the best feelings you can get from a street car.

I also heard stiff suspension and harder Recaro type seats (like the Evo) has can give the illusion of higher G's too due simply to the fact the seat isn't absorbing any of the force, this true?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/347785-highest-acceleration-gs/
Share on other sites

What model evo? They certainly are not "crazy quick" from factory. Not at all.

Maximum G force reached is simple once you understand what it means. It means accelerating in a direction greater than what gravity accelerates at opposed to you. So regardless at what speed it is or in what car it is, it is the vehicle that can accelerate the quickest. From a vehicle point of view, it is being able to rotate the wheels as fast as possible without slipping them (losing traction).

So really from a "reasonable" sense of view, an AWD car launching from stand still with a huge amount of power is the easiest to achieve.

My wagon was the fasted accelerating car Ive ever been in. To give you an idea, if you had your sunnies sitting on your head they would be in the back seat by the end of 2nd gear. It was pretty brutal.

I understand what it is, but I'm looking for peak, sudden, sharp power. Not a nice linear (which is more ideal for track purposes) power curve.

Put it this way (not that I'd ever use this as a basis for buying a car), which car will give your passengers the greatest "OMG I'm going to die" feeling from acceleration alone. Also, I know a stock evo isn't crazy quick, I'm just saying they feel way and was asking why.

probably coz the evo has a rather large turbo for it's engine size. so it comes on relatively hard compared to other stock set ups. therefore you get a sudden rush of acceleration. thats the G's sensation you are talking about that makes it feel quick.

linear delivery gets you further, but doesnt feel as quick.

Edited by Munkyb0y

Phil is right about fastest acceleration producing the greatest amount of G-forces. As for lateral G forces in the corners, that will be the car that can turn sharpest at the fastest speed and maintain traction.

The feeling of G-forces on the other hand, is another thing entirely and there's alot of perception involved. I believe that a car producing the most rapid change in G-force will give you the biggest feeling of being thrown into the seat. In all cars, this will be a launch off the line as you are going from zero G to something. Linear power delivery vehicles, such as N/A V8, whilst feeling fast off the line, will quickly have your senses adjust to the G-forces during acceleration. The speedo will be going up faster than it feels. Non-linear power delivery, like going from off boost to on boost in a car with a massive turbo, will offer a big "punch" that rapidly changes the acceleration G-force making it feel very fast (almost like "launching" from a rolling start). But it's all a matter of perception and your own idea of what constitutes the feeling of going fast. For what you want Kez, it's an engine with an oversized turbo that suddenly comes alive at 4500-5000rpm like a rollercoaster reaching a downhill. Enter the torque.

An interesting way to test all of it is to use a G-tech with constant G-force mode selected.

in any car the most G's you will feel will be launching in first gear. AWD will be the best for this as you can simply side step the clutch at high rpm (and hope something doesn't go bang, LOL).

if you want something that gives the feeling of quick acceleration then a lag monster is what you are after. something with a big turbo that doesn't come on song until high in the rev range. it doesn't even have to make that much power, but if the turbo kicks in hard then it will give the impression of having lots of power. i've been in a 32 with a t71 (i think) on it. didn't make boost until about 5500rpm, made less power than my stock turbo'd 33 and ran a high 14 at the drags, but when it came on boost it felt great. it was just a pity that even a granny in an excel was already a pair of tail lights in the distance due to being gutless below 5500rpm.

Get a litre bike ;)

+1, You'll spend a LOT on a car before you get anywhere near one (although I realise this isn't a price vs. performance argument).

The violence of a 1000cc bike is something that few people appreciate until they experience it. As is the case with big power cars.

My K6 GSXR 1000 still shocks me sometimes, even after 4years, and most pillions lose the ability to process the experience until about 5 minutes later, at which point most can only say "I cannot believe how fast that is"

Edited by Daleo

I had a friend with almost exactly the same car as Marc described. Made (only) 325hp, big laggy (5500rpm) turbo in an r32, epic screamer pipe too, i think that gave us an extra few mental kilowatts, felt amazing but would be a pain to drive...

I doubt anything will beat the G forces of those top fuel dragsters that do 0-400m in 3 or 4 seconds. In saying that, doesn't iPod have an application that senses G forces?

I think its called Racechrono..thats the one on my nokia anyway..

I doubt anything will beat the G forces of those top fuel dragsters that do 0-400m in 3 or 4 seconds. In saying that, doesn't iPod have an application that senses G forces?

i've got a dyno app on my phone. i managed to get 1200+hp at the fingertips, LOL

Highest G's in straight line aceleration you'll ever experience will be when that 22 wheeler kenworth rear ends you at a set of lights.

Regardless of what car you're driving.

Lol.

As far as cars go, you can't beat a highly modified AWD car for the perception of gigantic G forces. For example, highly modified GTR with AWD coming on to full boost is a wickedly frightening experience. It's absolutely awesome.

The problem with this style of non-linear power delivery is that you get the feeling that you're really just hanging on for dear life and hoping that you don't lose control. I can only imagine how much more pronounced it is on a sportsbike.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
    • Thanks for the info. The only "Issue" I've had with the shifter is I always found the throw between 4th and 6th gear too close. I'm always worried to shift into 4th accidently and sending my motor to the moon. Adam LZ recently came out with a video and stated Serialnine revised their shifters to correct this and will change all the revised parts for 150$. Strangely enough, I contacted Serialnine right after and they denied it and said it's bullshit. I found that strange as he's a distributer. I'll keep this forum post updated on that saga.
×
×
  • Create New...