Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

completely stock internals? balancer? cams? etc? 7000-7500. properly balanced built engine with aftermarket valve springs 8000-8500 any more than that and you really want to go with solid lifters and a serious setup with porting larger valves, better valve springs again. the list could go on to around 11,000 if you have deep enough pockets.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/349000-t04z-on-an-rb25/#findComment-5608642
Share on other sites

You wanted a food daily driver that could be used for drift etc... this was 2 days ago.

Now you want to use a turbo capable of 440rwkw that requires a good 25,000 to support it.

Two ends of the scale dude - pick one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/349000-t04z-on-an-rb25/#findComment-5608662
Share on other sites

Way too big for anything street driven and I wouldn't build an engine to suit a turbo anyway .

Big is just big and big isn't necessarily better . Far better off with an GT3076R if you want to stay with a mechanically std RB25 . If you wanted to build something build an RB30 and if you want something easy bolt a GT3582R onto it .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/349000-t04z-on-an-rb25/#findComment-5608757
Share on other sites

Just looking at the options mate this is all stuff I have lying around I don't have the same knowledge about jappers as I do about LS1's and if you knew me mate you would know that spending 25k on an engine setup is a cheap combo for my previous spendings on other cars.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/349000-t04z-on-an-rb25/#findComment-5608758
Share on other sites

Well if you've come from big capacity engines then I reckon an RB30 would be virtually a necessity because these smaller ones don't make gratifying torque off boost and its not like a Skyline weighs half of what an LS1 powered Commodore does .

I can relate to a well healed fella that bought himself a brand new locally delivered R32 GTR in the early 90's . Hated it , absolutely loathed the thing because he came from V8's and GTRs are heavy and Camry like off boost . It wouldn't pull the upper gears at pedestrian revs like his eights did so he flogged it off .

Anyway I reckon a twin cam RB30 with a reasonable CR would be the way to go because more cubes means the easiest foot pounds .

I don't know if an LS1 fits in a Skyline bay but geared right it would give some of the turbo ones a real big hurry up .

A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/349000-t04z-on-an-rb25/#findComment-5608792
Share on other sites

Well if you've come from big capacity engines then I reckon an RB30 would be virtually a necessity because these smaller ones don't make gratifying torque off boost and its not like a Skyline weighs half of what an LS1 powered Commodore does .

I can relate to a well healed fella that bought himself a brand new locally delivered R32 GTR in the early 90's . Hated it , absolutely loathed the thing because he came from V8's and GTRs are heavy and Camry like off boost . It wouldn't pull the upper gears at pedestrian revs like his eights did so he flogged it off .

Anyway I reckon a twin cam RB30 with a reasonable CR would be the way to go because more cubes means the easiest foot pounds .

I don't know if an LS1 fits in a Skyline bay but geared right it would give some of the turbo ones a real big hurry up .

A .

Read Bezerks build thread...

5.7L in an R32... ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/349000-t04z-on-an-rb25/#findComment-5608829
Share on other sites

Not too big at all, after all its not lag, its foreplay ;) .

Shoot anna a pm, http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/user/30020-msnismo/

She built a t04z equipped 25. She was actually a great help to me deciding whether to go the z or the gt35 (the 35 won out in the end).

She will help you, I would post up her build thread, but i cant seem to find it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/349000-t04z-on-an-rb25/#findComment-5609083
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...