Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6af5e5eb.jpg

Is that a raised deck OS30 or hi-deck rb28, or an RB30 ? The cam covers look suspisious close to the strut tower brace.

The comment made about RB29's Vcam setup in that thead seemed to indicate a custom v-cam system, not a hks kit? Having never seen it though I can only go on what other misinformation is out there...

Like the rumor that Paul of Red-R racing is developing a vcam style arrangement...

The comment made about RB29's Vcam setup in that thead seemed to indicate a custom v-cam system, not a hks kit? Having never seen it though I can only go on what other misinformation is out there...

Correct, it was not the HKS version.

Dont HKS have 3 different cam profiles? Which one would be the ideal one for a -5 setup?

Matt has the smallest version.... But then HKS recommend for a RS/TO4Z setup the biggest duration and lift setup in the V-Cam they half....

Is that a raised deck OS30 or hi-deck rb28, or an RB30 ? The cam covers look suspisious close to the strut tower brace.

The comment made about RB29's Vcam setup in that thead seemed to indicate a custom v-cam system, not a hks kit? Having never seen it though I can only go on what other misinformation is out there...

Like the rumor that Paul of Red-R racing is developing a vcam style arrangement...

Nope its a HKS 2.8.

Probably just the angle of the photo I took.

I know the owner of the car in Japan and he has mint 32,33,this 34 and another and a 35.

Too much coin !!

well....i am at the moment removing my rear housing from my gt4094r and sending it to the states to have a different type of quick spool valve machined into it. check the quick spool valve thread on here for pics..ifi dont like that then will sell and deffo fit twin 2860,s ....

Ill go from the start

Nismo AFM's

ARC Duel entry 105 mm cooler

Nismo plenum

Ported factory manifolds

GT RS's

HKS split dumps

HKS Front pipes (twin 70 mm into 85 mm)

3.5 'cat'

Kakimoto Full mega N1 catback.

hey paul - i finally read your thread & there is a lot information & opinions in here...

my setup is similar although i have:

stock intake plenum

-10 turbos (apparently dont makes as much as power as hks items lol)

xforce dumps

hks super drager exhaust (steps from 3.25", 3.5" then 3.75" at the rear diff)

z32 afms

100mm hks exhaust

ported exhaust manifolds

3ltr bottom end (wont necessarily give you more peak power, torque yes)

...the only thing i could pick which ive raised with you in the past & DOES make a massive difference: is your head ported? this will give you up to 50awkw gain when you are playing in the 400kw range (as confirmed by worksops i use)

i personally wouldn't go changing dumps & exhaust as mine is similar & makes 405awkw (450rwkw) @ 23psi. you want more midrange so yes go with -5s BUT before u do that, pick the brain of that other dyno tuner that i suggested (name disclosed as im not here to sledge workshops).

going to smaller cams - no way! ive had this discussion with crd, red r racing & rips racing many times - unless these workshops dont know what they're talking about & smoke bongs, leave your cams in there (im running 280's @ 10.5mm lift)

work with what you have otherwise your gtr will is going to send you broke (like the most of us lol)

go forth :)

hey paul - i finally read your thread & there is a lot information & opinions in here...

my setup is similar although i have:

stock intake plenum

-10 turbos (apparently dont makes as much as power as hks items lol)

xforce dumps

hks super drager exhaust (steps from 3.25", 3.5" then 3.75" at the rear diff)

z32 afms

100mm hks exhaust

ported exhaust manifolds

3ltr bottom end (wont necessarily give you more peak power, torque yes)

...the only thing i could pick which ive raised with you in the past & DOES make a massive difference: is your head ported? this will give you up to 50awkw gain when you are playing in the 400kw range (as confirmed by worksops i use)

i personally wouldn't go changing dumps & exhaust as mine is similar & makes 405awkw (450rwkw) @ 23psi. you want more midrange so yes go with -5s BUT before u do that, pick the brain of that other dyno tuner that i suggested (name disclosed as im not here to sledge workshops).

going to smaller cams - no way! ive had this discussion with crd, red r racing & rips racing many times - unless these workshops dont know what they're talking about & smoke bongs, leave your cams in there (im running 280's @ 10.5mm lift)

work with what you have otherwise your gtr will is going to send you broke (like the most of us lol)

go forth :)

Marko,

Head is ported.... how good of a job is anyones guess. Does it match the turbo's and cams? I have NFI

Cams as Ash has said a very touchy subject.

Tangomatt used baby cams (Ok he had vcam but meh)

Marcus used 264's @ 9.7 and got a mega result

I am using 270's @ 10.25 and it comes on later and makes less grunt.

Gav is using 272's (i think)

Ah we could go back and forth about this.

I also use 264 9.7

15psi @4000rpm made 489rwkw on E85 @ 1.8bar GTRS's

side pipes 3" x2

8.55:1

89mm bore

Another motor we built

more head porting than mine

BP98 with 10% methanol

264 9.7 15psi@3600rpm

614kw at the engine 22psi

-10's

side pipes 3" x2

8.7:1

89mm bore

Edited by BoostdR

I actually feel -10s will flow more. The anti-surge comp cover reduces efficiency to bring boost on slower to reduce surge. For a 3ltr I would go the garretts.

As for cams we went with what works. Used to use JUN 272's and ordered 264 by mistake. The results were more power everywhere. For under 400kw I would go mines shorepro. 252 10mm or whatever they are.....

I had the Gibson cams dialed. I can't remember exactley what they were. Something like 278 292 10.5 staggered but I think that wasn't at advertised duration. Will have to dig up the sheet for you guys. Base circle was 1mm under aswell.

I actually feel -10s will flow more. The anti-surge comp cover reduces efficiency to bring boost on slower to reduce surge. For a 3ltr I would go the garretts.

As for cams we went with what works. Used to use JUN 272's and ordered 264 by mistake. The results were more power everywhere. For under 400kw I would go mines shorepro. 252 10mm or whatever they are.....

I had the Gibson cams dialed. I can't remember exactley what they were. Something like 278 292 10.5 staggered but I think that wasn't at advertised duration. Will have to dig up the sheet for you guys. Base circle was 1mm under aswell.

I was looking at the 260's @ 10.8mm. Thoughts?

The Gibson cams are HUUGE. I wonder why they went for such huge duration?

I was looking at the 260's @ 10.8mm. Thoughts?

The Gibson cams are HUUGE. I wonder why they went for such huge duration?

gibson used big cams because they work - unless gibson was smoking the same stuff as jim souvas & rob ward :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...