Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The real problem here is that no one has called Nissan to inform them of their design flaw.

They clearly over spent on the much more expensive 2 piece design when they could have saved all that money making 1 piece shafts.

Forget engineering rules. This is obviously an oversight on their behalf. Someone should notify them

I asked these questions when it was made!

I picked up a 2 piece yesterday, gutting thing is I’ll need a second driveshaft loop and it certified!

I’m not keen on a high speed moment with the tailshaft doing some dub step death vibration

I’ll get onto Nissan and tell them to stop wasting time and money on the tailshaft and put it into forging the engine :domokun:

I asked these questions when it was made!

I picked up a 2 piece yesterday, gutting thing is I’ll need a second driveshaft loop and it certified!

I’m not keen on a high speed moment with the tailshaft doing some dub step death vibration

I’ll get onto Nissan and tell them to stop wasting time and money on the tailshaft and put it into forging the engine :domokun:

If you aren't having a problem with the shaft you have, why change it?

You will feel a vibration before anything worse happens.

It also depends on the material it's made from and how it was made (which is explained in detail in this thread).

If your shaft maker has made it from the correct material for the length and diameter then it might be perfectly fine

Remember that the critical speed is tailshaft speed, which you will only reach when you have very high road speed. 6000+ rpm at the tailshaft is fairly hiking, and is not going to happen on the road very often, and not happen on many racetracks for long either. That said, on a racecar, that will do that speed maybe once or twice every lap....you'll eventually have a bad moment, and that bad moment will upwards of 200km/hm, which you won't like. So, not a risk worth taking on a race car, and strangely enough, probably perfectly fine on a road car.

That said, I like the 2 piece design. Engineering wise it is much smarter, and does a better job of separating any movement of gearbag relative to diff from each other - not that it matters so much in an IRS car.

But for my overall preference, the only engineers who have ever really showed an interest in doing it properly are those from Peugot and Porsche (and a few others) who used a torque tube. I can remember reading that the solid driveshaft up the centre of the torque tube on a 928 was capable of absorbing something like 7 or 11 complete twists as it loaded up on launch with a 500+ HP engine in a race car. That is some serious business.

Steel does not have a fatigue life, it has a fatigue limit and as long as it is operated at a stress level below this then it should last for an unlimited no. of cycles.

Remember that the critical speed is tailshaft speed, which you will only reach when you have very high road speed. 6000+ rpm at the tailshaft is fairly hiking, and is not going to happen on the road very often, and not happen on many racetracks for long either. That said, on a racecar, that will do that speed maybe once or twice every lap....you'll eventually have a bad moment, and that bad moment will upwards of 200km/hm, which you won't like. So, not a risk worth taking on a race car, and strangely enough, probably perfectly fine on a road car.

That said, I like the 2 piece design. Engineering wise it is much smarter, and does a better job of separating any movement of gearbag relative to diff from each other - not that it matters so much in an IRS car.

But for my overall preference, the only engineers who have ever really showed an interest in doing it properly are those from Peugot and Porsche (and a few others) who used a torque tube. I can remember reading that the solid driveshaft up the centre of the torque tube on a 928 was capable of absorbing something like 7 or 11 complete twists as it loaded up on launch with a 500+ HP engine in a race car. That is some serious business.

6000 tail shaft rpm is the same as 6000 crankshaft rpm in 4th gear.

That's 111km/hr I'm pretty sure.

i think 4th at 6000 is around 165 ish km/h (with 4.3 diff)

Yeah my bad. I'm using an imperial calculator and that's MPH not KM/H.

So with a 4.11:1 it's 178km/h at 6000rpm on a 235/45/17 and 170km/h on a 4.3:1

Got my tailshaft today, I opted for the biggest unis I could get, they built the entire shaft using my old centre plates, and my sliding spline drive. Made everything else, heavier tube, 90x30 uni's that are solid, no grease galleries. The bloke at hardie spicer said it'll handle 1000 odd hp, and massive tourque, so I should never break this one!

I did have to flare the end of gearbox cover/shield to allow the uni to clear.

Best bit, replacable uni's!!!!

If anyone wants better photos of details etc just ask..

post-80095-0-65041300-1347274507_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-09720100-1347274551_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-95989600-1347274574_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-10525700-1347274645_thumb.jpg

post-80095-0-11672800-1347274667_thumb.jpg

Got my tailshaft today, I opted for the biggest unis I could get, they built the entire shaft using my old centre plates, and my sliding spline drive. Made everything else, heavier tube, 90x30 uni's that are solid, no grease galleries. The bloke at hardie spicer said it'll handle 1000 odd hp, and massive tourque, so I should never break this one!

I did have to flare the end of gearbox cover/shield to allow the uni to clear.

Best bit, replacable uni's!!!!

If anyone wants better photos of details etc just ask..

That shield can be knocked out quite easily if you have trouble with it fouling. It's a dust guard for the rear seal so can be ditched with only minor ramifications.

That shield can be knocked out quite easily if you have trouble with it fouling. It's a dust guard for the rear seal so can be ditched with only minor ramifications.

Yeah I popped it out to flare it a little, id like to keep it on, but if it gets in the way still, ill machine up a s/s one the right size ;)

This is what happens to a single piece tailshaft at 8,300RPM. Its in an AE86 so the tailshaft isn't exactly all that long either. Guy had a tailshaft loop as well, it ripped it clean out, took half the gearbox out with it along with the shifter and the fuel lines. Punched 4x big holes in the floor.

There is another guy here in SA that had a Cefiro. Freshly built car, new very expensive engine, clutch, gearbox etc etc.

Tailshaft failed in 4th gear when he attempted his scando into turn one at Mallala. The shock was so severe to the car that it the car actually buckled, destroyed the gearbox and engine. Car was pretty much gone because of a failed tailshaft.

I for one, will not be putting my single piece shaft back in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...