Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gidday all,

Just looking for some ideas on a problem ive encountered. My car makes 295kws on 14psi and then basically stops making power from that point on even with the cam gears adjusted, more boost and ignition timing changed etc.Ive added the dyno plot which shows 4 psi = about 9 kws which isnt right for a turbo of my size.

Rb30det

R32 rb25 head with cam gears but stock cams

Rebuilt internals

8.5 comp rb30, all rebuilt etc

3.5 inch exhaust with one muffler (loud as hell so hopefully flows ok)

gt3540 1.06 turbo, with Sinco customs turbo manifold with the gate out the housing.

Im just looking for some first hand ideas of what the problem may be. Some would say cams, but ive had friends of friends make 370kws on the stock cams. My intake is a bit interesting so have added up a picture of that 2.

Any suggestions would be great, but if you dont know, please dont post as it will just give me things to check that i dont need to.

Cheers

post-21312-0-81235400-1296044413_thumb.jpg

post-21312-0-94193800-1296044430_thumb.jpg

Edited by SirRacer
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/351809-weird-problem-with-rb3025/
Share on other sites

Which intake manifold is that? It looks like the RB20 manifold. I would think that is your restriction. From what i've read on this site is that these manifold wont make more than 300kw, should look into getting a front facing plenum.

My 2cents

Well we all know it's not the cams, plenty of people have run far more power with the same turbo.

Check the timing belt is on correct, even if you've checked it. Recheck. the amount of times this has been the issue is amazing of late.

Doesnt sound like exhaust issues, either way drop it from the dump pipe, super easy check

Inlet manifold as stated above is a good option too, but more hassle

Measure boost pressure @ turbo outlet and somewhere after the intercooler to check to see if there is a pressure drop/issue

That'll give you plenty for now.

I'm thinking an inlet manifold too.

I'd look at getting yourself a greddy copy or something. Can be had from Autobarn for about $350. Don't buy ebay ones, they are shit, and you'll end up replacing it.

Thanks guys.

Exhaust has no cat, one cannon muffler and bugger all bends. Its noisy as hell but i didnt build it as a street car.

Intake is an r32 so you cant just go and buy a greddy copy so easily, its custom manifold time.

I asked about the timing belt and whether the cams werent installed at TDC, but the tuner said the engine ran way too smoothly for that to be the case.

Will check out the turbo pressure drop too.

A friend of mine whos very clued up with rb's is doing some research as well so hopefully we can get to the bottom of the problem.

what brand are the cam gears

are they secure, have they been double checked

check base timing at idle

as ash said, double check, triple check

whatever is wrong, is fundamentally wrong given the power is ass, ie it wont be a slight restriction causing it, id say timing is way off or something fundamental to make that much of a difference in the results (or to hamper it)

Greddy cam gears. Very secure. We adjusted them both ways and they just shifted the power curve.

Something is definitley wrong somewhere so all these ideas are great. Im not sure about the fuel batch idea though, maybe read the post a bit more, as its making power everywhere else, so there isnt any reason why at a set point it should stop.

295kws @14 psi is actually pretty good power wise, its just once we get past this point that things cause issues.I asked the tuner about the timing and he said its bang on. Cant download the map at the moment but will send it to Lith who will no doubt check it out once ive got the info.

It won't be in the map, it'll be something else dude.

As i said - just because you are "told" the timing belt is correct, does not mean it is.

Cars can have a belt off 1-2 teeth and run/idle perfectly but have issues @ varying points.

You really need to have it all checked and ruled out otherwise you'll never get anywhere.

Is this DIY mechanic sort of thing or should i be checked by a workshop? Will get it checked by mechanic mate on Saturday. I asked the tuner about this also as the engine has just been rebuilt. He seemed to think that it wouldnt make good power anywhere if that was the case, but will check it now anyway.

I havent seen any other rb25de (r32) intakes with power levels higher than this so thought id may have been that.

Edited by SirRacer

Only reason I asked for the map was I wanted to see what was happening with timing and fuel in the higher load zones, IMHO at 14psi its making reasonable power for the boost level - so the fundamental flaw isn't related to the engine's inherant ability to use air and make power... there is something that changes when it goes from 14psi to 18psi. If the tuner was having to do weird things to keep everything happy, I thought it might be a clue given its the closest to having the car right in front of me.

The power curve tracks the previous one - usually with a boost leak or a restriction of sorts the curve will change shape a bit, but in this case it actually looks like the boost level is different but its hardly reflected at all in torque or power anywhere in the curve. At the moment it seems easiest to blame the inlet manifold, though there are apparently other cars which have made more on the stock one on pump gas - I haven't seen any in person myself however, as most people seem to go aftermarket after 300kw.

Just tracked down a guy in NZ who has had a similar problem. He couldnt quite explain it but the gist was that the belt was stretching and throwing the timing out.

Anyone care to explain how this would work?

I spoke to a friend whos a mechanic tonight and he seemed to think if the belt was out and throwing timing the car would run like crap, yet mine runs perfectly.

This is what he wrote anyway (i cant quite decipher it)

"My Car we changed the 360 degree cam angle sensor

And I put on a Crank Angle Sensor. Was going out by 14-15 degree now is 0/0 perfect timing.

When we put cam angle sensor on made 409kw I think and timing out by 4 degrees. Put Crank angle sensor on the 0/0 made 451kw at same boost"

the Nissan CAS do weird things when on the fritz i've had a similar issue to your NZ mate but it had nothing to do cam belt stretch.... as for your actual issue i could not say.

Just tracked down a guy in NZ who has had a similar problem. He couldnt quite explain it but the gist was that the belt was stretching and throwing the timing out.

Tuner should probably be able to see symptoms of this while tuning - thats with the CAS. I'd also expect this to be an obvious issue at all boost levels.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...