Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you have a 20k budget why on earth would you even entertain the idea of using an rb25 head.

The RB25 (non NEO) head is very understated. Bigger ports than a 26, has VCT. The only thing that lets it down would be the hydraulic lifters if you are planning on revving it past 8500rpm.

As a sort of aside, everyone says that Rb30's are a cheaper option, since stroker kits are up around the 6-7K mark. However, they all come with a set of forged rods, pistons, crank etc. By the time you get forged pistons and rods for your rb30 build wouldn't it be costing up around that mark anyway?

hmmm all valid points, and yeah the whole thing about RB cranks is right, I think that Nitto thing may end up being the way I go with an RB26 head, those stroker kits are nuts with a 12k rpm limiter, and means I can run a retardedly oversized turbo haha

and yeah the length is basically why it loses harmonic stability, also any buildup on certain counterweights are going to have a big issue in harmonics as well

lots of factors but yeah i heard about those nitto kits the other day and was just :yucky: YEEEEEEAHHHHHHHHHH

20K... Why would you bother staying with an RB engine?

LS2 plus twin turbos...

/Thread.

because i'm not like every arsehole in my arsehole home town and go and throw V8's in anything that moves because "v8's are hectic" i'd prefer something original and more JDM (sorry big purist)

as said, its a 31. 31s live for slapper 30s with cast pistons and 25+psi boost

whats so arseholeish about a v8 31? more power and torque everywhere is a bad thing now is it? twin turbo ls2 skyline would be awesome

because i'm not like every arsehole in my arsehole home town and go and throw V8's in anything that moves because "v8's are hectic" i'd prefer something original and more JDM (sorry big purist)

so your saying GT autosounds ls1 r34 isnt hectik?

but in this case slapper 25/30 would be more cost effective or a rb20, both goes well with 25psi!

as said, its a 31. 31s live for slapper 30s with cast pistons and 25+psi boost

whats so arseholeish about a v8 31? more power and torque everywhere is a bad thing now is it? twin turbo ls2 skyline would be awesome

Twin turbo LS2 Skyline IS awesome, I can tell you from experience.*

*I had a dream lastnight.

No.

Put it this way. For $7500 you get a fully assembled balanced/blueprinted RB30 forged bottom end built by RIPS rated at 1300hp and 9000rpm.

That's awesome! Why don't people who want to modify their engines just save up and put these in? I mean that's pretty cheap, why bother going down a more expensive path?

Because they're dirty forklift engines that don't rev.:rolleyes:

yeah, that confrimed my suspisions, rb30 is a much better option than a normal stroker.

Now, a stroked RB30... wasn't someone trying to make a RB34 kit somewhere?

That's awesome! Why don't people who want to modify their engines just save up and put these in? I mean that's pretty cheap, why bother going down a more expensive path?

Because people are stupid and think they can do it for cheaper, reality is there is a reasonable chance the builder you pick will stuff it up.

so your saying GT autosounds ls1 r34 isnt hectik?

but in this case slapper 25/30 would be more cost effective or a rb20, both goes well with 25psi!

gt autosounds ls1 r34 is one of the meanest things to grace our tracks. it does not make traction anywhere. and the funny thing is... weigh and rb30 bottom end and weigh an ls1 bottom end. and no, the bottom end in the ls1 isnt weak.

im an rb fan yes. hell i have poored over 12 grand into the lastest engine in the 33 track car and its still no where near complete. but i do think often that im pooring money into an old heavy engine and i could of spent it better taking other avenues. next time ill go a blown ls2 lol. if the missus doesnt cut my nuts off for pooring every cent i earn into cars lol

Because they're dirty forklift engines that don't rev.:rolleyes:

yeah, that confrimed my suspisions, rb30 is a much better option than a normal stroker.

Now, a stroked RB30... wasn't someone trying to make a RB34 kit somewhere?

Spool have made a RB34 kit. Think that was only 6k

That's awesome! Why don't people who want to modify their engines just save up and put these in? I mean that's pretty cheap, why bother going down a more expensive path?

Yep it is a fantastic option and in reality way overkill for most applications.

If my engine ever pops and I decide I want to do a RB30 i'll just get one of RIPS cheaper kits ($3000ish) and slap my head onto it.

Because people are stupid and think they can do it for cheaper, reality is there is a reasonable chance the builder you pick will stuff it up.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

20k isnt that much for a build from scratch including tuning.

if he is going 3.2 would need another 7-10k for a head to utilise the bottom end,

decent turbo kit is going to take up 5k of it?

fuel system?

or is the 20k just for a long engine?

saves around 5k by not stroking it, std 26 or 30.

but if its to run a big turbo on a dyno it wont need extra capacity

Edited by jangles
  • 2 weeks later...

tbh the Spool kit is something I'd steer clear of, most of the kits I've seen use I-beams but they use H-beams, and there was a fair bit of clearancing at the bottom of the combustion chamber. I did look into those RIPS motors..

and lol i didn't actually say money is no object, the budget is $20k for a running, driveable car (though massive power and driveable on street rarely go in the same sentence tbh)

i thought about the RIPS, it revs to 9K, I could get a Nitto stroker kit with an RB30 block for the same rated at 1600hp and 12k rpm max though?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...