Jump to content
SAU Community

Will I Need A Retune After Cahanging My Catalytic Converter ?


Recommended Posts

Just bought a Venom 500 series hi flow cat with a 100 CPSI flow for 3 inch exhaust system. I am running a Microtech Lt x12s ecu , will i need a retune once i fit the new catalytic converter ? At the moment it has a ceramic cat fitted to the exhaust system , which has had a few bumps & bruises !!! So i thought i would replace it with a stainless steal one , which will last longer & have better flow. Will the extra flow cause the fuel / air ratios to change ? :thanks:

no

flow speed wont be noticable

But if i'm going from 400 CPSI cat to a 100 CPSI cat flow sould be alot better ! If not what would be the point in changing cats then ?

Edited by Tweaky
  • Haha 1

The point of changing the cat is to relieve backpressure, with a freeflowing cat the exhaust velocity is maintained (where it might have been slowed down when caught in the 400cpsi) which helps helps turbo response.

The point of changing the cat is to relieve backpressure, with a freeflowing cat the exhaust velocity is maintained (where it might have been slowed down when caught in the 400cpsi) which helps helps turbo response.

So once the new Hi flow cat is fitted & there is better flow , will that be enough to upset any current tune settings on the ecu ? Will the car have to go back to my tuner for any slight adjustments ? :thanks:

  • Haha 1

But if i'm going from 400 CPSI cat to a 100 CPSI cat flow sould be alot better ! If not what would be the point in changing cats then ?

are you expecting amazing things from changing cats? unless your running high numbers it doesn't really change much

ive tried more cats than an 80 year old chinese cook

Edited by Clutch
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

if anything

you would come on boost earlier, causing a lean of fuel in certain rev ranges.

but this would only happen if your tune was shit to begin with ie running TOOOO lean..

shouldnt be a problem, unless your fussed about 1 or 2 kw's..

O.k thanks guys , just wanted to make sure ! Better to be safe then sorry :nyaanyaa: Car is making the 290rwkw mark at the moment , the guy who sold me the cat recommend i get a tune after it is fitted. Thats why i'm double checking :thumbsup: The last tune was done 3 months ago & car is running great , anything i think the car would be running on the rich side.

Edited by Tweaky
  • 14 years later...

Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate)

Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?

20 minutes ago, silviaz said:

Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate)

Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily.

30 minutes ago, silviaz said:

Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?

Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily.

Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.

Ah, to clarify if the car has already been tuned and has been modified and you want to go from a oem cat to a 100 cell or decat or vice versa.Are you saying that the car doesn't need to be tuned after a cat change if it's already been tuned?

Edited by silviaz
7 minutes ago, silviaz said:

Ah, to clarify if the car has already been tuned and has been modified and you want to go from a oem cat to a 100 cell or decat or vice versa.Are you saying that the car doesn't need to be tuned after a cat change if it's already been tuned?

Maybe?

If changing the cat to a higher flowing cat, caused the turbo to spool more quickly, and those areas of the map had not been tuned for the boost level it is now seeing, then yes you would need a re-tune. How dangerous it is running without the updated tune would depend on how far out the tune is with the now higher boost levels, how the engine protection has been setup, is the ECU compensating with a wideband sensor, is the boost control closed loop blah blah million other things...

But yeah having said that, I wouldn't be surprised if changing out the cat for a high flow, in say a full 3" exhaust, made no noticeable difference at all. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...