Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey recently got my car tuned with the new rb25 hi flow and have found the turbo not to be hitting fullboost till 4500 would like to be able to bring this down as much as possible.

Have been told a steel intake pipe should help with response ?? what about the rubber aftermarket ones ?

At the moment just looking for response. Tuner thinks will make 210 on 18 psi with injectors and afm but really looking for respose bring boost on earlier

greedy fmic

turbotec boost controoler

nisstune

full straight through 3" dump to 3.5" back

.8 plugs

yellow jackets

rb25 hypergear hi flow

186 at 16-15 psi very laggy

cheers

The above intake could be corect i can close the rubber stock pipe with reasonable eas with 2 finger so chance it could be closing a bit ??

post-77561-0-65581900-1297677200_thumb.jpg

Edited by Ke55pig
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/353928-help-with-rb20det-response/
Share on other sites

i have but have heard both good and bad stories i gues worst case is no gain at all .Looking for thing to regain response because im not to sure but i thing 450 full boost is pretty dam laggy even on a 20

I understand im not going to get nothing awesome but a mate got a 25/40 and get full boost at 4000 rpm on a 20 something musnt be right with my setup.

Also maybe thinking about e85 have heard of it bringing boost on earlier

Edited by Ke55pig

Well I doubt that because they wont make 20psi under 4000revs on a 25, even a 25/30 would struggle.

E85 will hurt boost response in 99% of cases

if you only want 210rwkws when ditch the high flow and use a standard RB25 Neo (OP6) turbo. or find a RB specific HKS GT2530

I understand im not going to get nothing awesome but a mate got a 35/40 and get full boost at 4000 rpm on a 20 something musnt be right with my setup.

Also maybe thinking about e85 have heard of it bringing boost on earlier

3540 on full boost by 4000 on an rb20? No freaking way, not even with a .63 rear housing. With a .63 rear housing you're lucky to get hit full boost on a rb25 that early dude. Unless he has some top secret goodies and some jungle juice fuel he's using.....

edit: beat me to it zebra

Edited by JKR-32

Well I doubt that because they wont make 20psi under 4000revs on a 25, even a 25/30 would struggle.

E85 will hurt boost response in 99% of cases

if you only want 210rwkws when ditch the high flow and use a standard RB25 Neo (OP6) turbo. or find a RB specific HKS GT2530

Im not ditching it i only bought it awhile ago im looking to make around 230-240 But at the moment would like to get some better response

As stock 20s with 25 turb keep up till top of 3rd kinda sad wen i spend decent money on a turbo and heap of boost.

Get a 3inch hard intake pipe as hypergear mentioned. The turbo can't build up boost if it can't suck in air.

Get an high pressure actuator. That will make lot of differences as stock actuator lets loose at 2psi and fully opens by 7, while high pressure actautor don't starts to open till about 15.

What's the size of your current turbo? I mean wheel sizes as well as ex. housing A/R size. 

Since it's a RB25 highflow, I assume it has like 400-450hp worth of compressor flow and appropriate turbine to support that flow, so must be 2871 52 or 56 trim-sized. Now some easy calcs, just to verify. 450hp turbo on a 2 litre equals to 225hp/litre and should have similar response to a RB25 with a turbo, that provides 225*2.5 = 562.5 hp. This power fits right between GT30R and GT35R turbos, and RB25 spools GT30 at ~3500-4000 and GT35 at 4000-4500, depending on rear housing, so your response sounds right. Even SR20's spool 2871 at  around 4000 rpm (again, depending on compressor trim and housing A/R), and having bigger capacity cylinders they tend to spool turbos better than RB20's.

I'd change your current turbo to a Disco Potato or a 2860R and used it in a RB25 21U housing for more response or in a OP6 housing for slightly more power.

But that's just my opinion.

It's been asked but you haven't answered. Which highflow did you get? Hypergear does quite a few different ones so if you have one of the bigger 280+ capable ones you aren't going to significantly improve your response.

I had one of the original GCG stage 2 highflows on my rb20, same same. lazy coming onto boost and you had to keep the revs up so you didn't drop off boost.

With an rb20 you just have to accept that nothing will happen below 4k. Been there, done that, got an rb25.

Seeing as you havent done injectors or any engine hardware yet, I would say drop an RB25 in with your RB20 cams and forget about the VCT.

Simply bolt all your peripherals to an RB25 long motor and intake manifold and get it retuned. The difference should be everything your looking for plus more, much more torque, better response and about 220rwkw on the stock injectors I believe.

I just dont see a problem with your dyno sheet to be honest. If you were in NSW I would sell you my old RB25 for cheap, too bad it looks like your in SA.

GL

seen more 20s with more mods and still the same, its never going to be responsive dont waste your money and time doing what other people have already tried and had no sucess best thing the cheapest is already mentioned here, pull out the RB20 and slot a RB25 into it you wont regret it!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...