Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey recently got my car tuned with the new rb25 hi flow and have found the turbo not to be hitting fullboost till 4500 would like to be able to bring this down as much as possible.

Have been told a steel intake pipe should help with response ?? what about the rubber aftermarket ones ?

At the moment just looking for response. Tuner thinks will make 210 on 18 psi with injectors and afm but really looking for respose bring boost on earlier

greedy fmic

turbotec boost controoler

nisstune

full straight through 3" dump to 3.5" back

.8 plugs

yellow jackets

rb25 hypergear hi flow

186 at 16-15 psi very laggy

cheers

The above intake could be corect i can close the rubber stock pipe with reasonable eas with 2 finger so chance it could be closing a bit ??

post-77561-0-65581900-1297677200_thumb.jpg

Edited by Ke55pig
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/353928-help-with-rb20det-response/
Share on other sites

i have but have heard both good and bad stories i gues worst case is no gain at all .Looking for thing to regain response because im not to sure but i thing 450 full boost is pretty dam laggy even on a 20

I understand im not going to get nothing awesome but a mate got a 25/40 and get full boost at 4000 rpm on a 20 something musnt be right with my setup.

Also maybe thinking about e85 have heard of it bringing boost on earlier

Edited by Ke55pig

Well I doubt that because they wont make 20psi under 4000revs on a 25, even a 25/30 would struggle.

E85 will hurt boost response in 99% of cases

if you only want 210rwkws when ditch the high flow and use a standard RB25 Neo (OP6) turbo. or find a RB specific HKS GT2530

I understand im not going to get nothing awesome but a mate got a 35/40 and get full boost at 4000 rpm on a 20 something musnt be right with my setup.

Also maybe thinking about e85 have heard of it bringing boost on earlier

3540 on full boost by 4000 on an rb20? No freaking way, not even with a .63 rear housing. With a .63 rear housing you're lucky to get hit full boost on a rb25 that early dude. Unless he has some top secret goodies and some jungle juice fuel he's using.....

edit: beat me to it zebra

Edited by JKR-32

Well I doubt that because they wont make 20psi under 4000revs on a 25, even a 25/30 would struggle.

E85 will hurt boost response in 99% of cases

if you only want 210rwkws when ditch the high flow and use a standard RB25 Neo (OP6) turbo. or find a RB specific HKS GT2530

Im not ditching it i only bought it awhile ago im looking to make around 230-240 But at the moment would like to get some better response

As stock 20s with 25 turb keep up till top of 3rd kinda sad wen i spend decent money on a turbo and heap of boost.

Get a 3inch hard intake pipe as hypergear mentioned. The turbo can't build up boost if it can't suck in air.

Get an high pressure actuator. That will make lot of differences as stock actuator lets loose at 2psi and fully opens by 7, while high pressure actautor don't starts to open till about 15.

What's the size of your current turbo? I mean wheel sizes as well as ex. housing A/R size. 

Since it's a RB25 highflow, I assume it has like 400-450hp worth of compressor flow and appropriate turbine to support that flow, so must be 2871 52 or 56 trim-sized. Now some easy calcs, just to verify. 450hp turbo on a 2 litre equals to 225hp/litre and should have similar response to a RB25 with a turbo, that provides 225*2.5 = 562.5 hp. This power fits right between GT30R and GT35R turbos, and RB25 spools GT30 at ~3500-4000 and GT35 at 4000-4500, depending on rear housing, so your response sounds right. Even SR20's spool 2871 at  around 4000 rpm (again, depending on compressor trim and housing A/R), and having bigger capacity cylinders they tend to spool turbos better than RB20's.

I'd change your current turbo to a Disco Potato or a 2860R and used it in a RB25 21U housing for more response or in a OP6 housing for slightly more power.

But that's just my opinion.

It's been asked but you haven't answered. Which highflow did you get? Hypergear does quite a few different ones so if you have one of the bigger 280+ capable ones you aren't going to significantly improve your response.

I had one of the original GCG stage 2 highflows on my rb20, same same. lazy coming onto boost and you had to keep the revs up so you didn't drop off boost.

With an rb20 you just have to accept that nothing will happen below 4k. Been there, done that, got an rb25.

Seeing as you havent done injectors or any engine hardware yet, I would say drop an RB25 in with your RB20 cams and forget about the VCT.

Simply bolt all your peripherals to an RB25 long motor and intake manifold and get it retuned. The difference should be everything your looking for plus more, much more torque, better response and about 220rwkw on the stock injectors I believe.

I just dont see a problem with your dyno sheet to be honest. If you were in NSW I would sell you my old RB25 for cheap, too bad it looks like your in SA.

GL

seen more 20s with more mods and still the same, its never going to be responsive dont waste your money and time doing what other people have already tried and had no sucess best thing the cheapest is already mentioned here, pull out the RB20 and slot a RB25 into it you wont regret it!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...