Jump to content
SAU Community

Anyone Else Struggle With The Practicality Of Owning A Gtr?


Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Just wanted to see other's opinion on owning a GTR. Whenever I own one, I seem to see that for me, they just are not practical. But when I dont have one, I seem to talk myself into why its Ok. Seems pretty dumb I know, but I have owned my R32 GTR, probably my 5th GTR and without a doubt, the best, but still seem to find myself saying, I need a completely different car.

I purchased this car because of the amazing build quality and reliability it had, as I was looking to use it as a daily driver and every now and then take it to the track, but I dont have time, nor want to track such a good car.

Is this a normal mindset of a GTR owner or am I just crazy????

post-8487-0-46715600-1297987002_thumb.jpg

Ha yes I think this is the normal mindset of a GTR owner! I wouldn't say you are not crazy, more that near every other GTR owner is as crazy as you are.

They are not very practical day to day. As soon as you need to carry something - say a set of rims you have no choice but to stick some in the passenger seats.

I decided that there was no way I was ever going to sell my GTR, so I have made sure I have a good place to store it and I have a sh!tbox utility to drive as a daily. It's the best feeling being able to leave your daily wherever you want and not have to worry what happens to it. It has four doors, can tow the GTR and a tray for carting parts around.

Although - and this is where the crazy comes in - now my car is going to be so nice once finished... I am already pondering an R34 GTR rolling shell to build up for track / rally bashing. I don't think it will ever end.

What do you mean not practical?

I cannot find a reason ever NOT to need 350rwkw of RB26 fun.

My brakes are ridiculously noisy (DS3000's), my tyres are noisy (semi's), 7.5lts of oil takes 10-15mins to warm up & the exhaust is perhaps a bit louder than it should be.

Do i care? Fk no. I knew what i was getting into!

I get in there, everytime and i love it. Same for my GTS-R. No issues or complaints, i get out with a smile everytime even if its just been putting around the street.

  • Like 1

Yeh you guys suck so bad, I know exactly what you mean!!

I know Im Crazy, but these cars are just soooo easy to fall in love with. I tell you right now, its either love for life or cold the sphincter of the universe for me!!

So much like a crack addiction, not that I have had one!!!:)

WTF its the most practical choice when talking super performance for a reasonable price... the 33 takes 4 adults comfortably which can't be said for many modern sports coupes... power windows, air con etc

only complaint I had was the super hard Teins... so I had them rebuilt with saner spring rates and now its perfect... yes everyone in a 10 block radius can hear me put my foot down and fuel consumption is poor but other than that its got no real issues... I don't have to drive very far to work and parking in a secure garage is free, I imagine if I had to sit for ages in peak hour traffic everyday I might reconsider

I take it shopping or whatever, leave it in carparks... nobody even bats an eyelid... if it does get dinged or whatever its a Nissan so repairing it is cheap... go price up what it costs to maintain or repair a performance Euro car... even a newer model Ford or Holden are expensive... have a look at the prices to repair anything on a Porsche and you'll have a stroke

I bought KU36 almost 2 years ago for $1100... that's for 18/275 all round and they're a great tyre and still got plenty of meat... price up a set of replacement tyres on a new Audi or BMW, ridiculous!

GTR everyday FTW :cheers:

yeah my mates are mostly aussie but they all seem to have azn gf's and they fit nicely in the back lol

seriously though 33's have the most room in the back of all skylines, I've had 6ft mates in the backseats with no complaints

I reckon I could run a mid 11 quarter mile with 4 dudes in the car, in comfort... not many other cars you can do that in for the same price

Lol r33 barge, sure it can fit loads of things in but its huge and looks like a whale ... :-P

2 cars for the win, Corona = daily. 4doors and decent boot good on petrol .... GTR = weekender when I don't have to park it at the shops ect ect

also 2 cars helps with running costs.

I've recently just been handed the choice either the gtr or the missus....bit the bullet and chose the missus, she finally cracked the shits seeing a grand a week go into the car... but for practicality i wouldnt go past a skyline got 3 of them all over 350 rwkw and daily drivers...

fuel just disappears though, other than that, i've got no complaints!

It fits azn sized passengers perfectly! and that's all i ferry around anyway.

haha try an evo for fuel economy..... Or lack there of :P

lol, na just get bored and want to keep modifying cars...basically i had it as 1 mod a week on the weekends...last mod was to be nitrous, the other 2 dailys run nitrous

only owned my R34 for month and a bit now, but it is very loud and suspension is shocking and breaks are loud too

so hardly i call practical....

thank god it only a weekend toy and have my trusty corolla for daily duties

PS - suspension being replaced next week and looking in to adding mid muffler to quieten her down, should stop my complaints a bit

GTR daily for the win.

Sure there are better cruising cars with softer suspension to get to work in, but then again do you really want to trade that for your GTR? Hopping in the car in the morning driving down the street with a smile on your face :thumbsup: sorry, but a corolla wont do that for me. I couldn't justify spending 2k a year on insurance and another 500 on rego just for a

Sunday drive, not to mention the service costs of a GTR

Once I walked out to the car and some kid (like 8 years old?) was walking along with his father telling him how much he wants a GTR and touched the badge as he walked past :D

In Japan, about 25 years ago, the engineering arm of Nissan brings into the boardroom, a brand spanking new RB26DETT and says, "What do you want to do with this boss?"

Steering and suspension arm does the same with their ATTESSA & HICAS and ask, "What shall we do with this boss?"

Boss says, "Let's make a street car with race car componentry/engine!"

And a legend was born.

Now who wants to look at a legend > buy a model of a legend > test drive a legend > has to own a legend > feels compelled to experience a legend ? ? ?

nuffsaid

Obv, having back surgery a few years back doesnt help either!! Thats pretty irritating most days for me, so hence I have a love hate relationship with the GTR:(

Having the pleasure of driving such a car is all I need in the morning to put me in a good mood, the full boost onto the freeway blasting past $400,00 sports cars that have a crack only to see my smile in the rear mirror getting further and further away into the distance, sure it doesn't carry D-Max front quarters in the back let alone the boot, but it happily takes 4 18 Inch TE37's, 285 Tyres, a slab of beer and the shopping home.

Love it..

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...