Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

pretty sure there was a thread about this maybe 6 or so months ago. think if i remember correctly most people agreed it was to do with incorrect torquing. cant remember other ideas suggested...

+1

Very sensitive to the way they are removed and installed. Slow and steady by undoing all the bolts a little at a time is the safe way, same when doing them up. It's due to the length of the cams and which lobes are compressing their respective valve springs part way along the cam.

If you put on and do up the caps unevenly or one at a time, fracturing/weakening and or breakage may occur.

Or if the cam has never been out than check thencam belt

Hasnt slipped causing the exhaust valves to contact pistons then snapping the cam.

Couldnt u hear the engine had no compression when cranking?

Cranked like a normal engine as the valves are all shut so it would have had compression even if we tested it. Belt is fine, tight as f**k and absolutely no way it has slipped.

Doesn't look like an oil supply issue either as there was plenty of oil and the two bearings I checked (next to the snap) look brand new.

Edited by Rolls

Yer my mate snapped one. As said above it was due to incorrect instsllation procedure. He tried to start tightening from the center but because the valves were holding the two ends of the shaft up it must have started to bend and then it snapped when he applied pressure on the next bolts.

Silly mistake really but it was his first major engine work. Was years ago now.

If you have not had the camshafts out could maybe suggest that timing belt was over tention or it slipped a tooth. Surely u would of heard valve to piston noise if any contact occured tho.

Cant over tensioning the timing belt load up the front of the shaft. the extra tension is trying to pull the front of the camshaft downwards. And even the smallest amount of deviation to the cam rotation will cause u a problem

Could a seized lifter also cause the cam to snap? Been speaking to a few people and a mate whos rebuilt 30+ motors reckons he has seen it all the time where if someone rebuilds a head and puts the lifters back in out of order etc it can happen.

I have a spare cam so might take all the lifters out, see what the deal is, then compression test it with the other cam, who knows might be lucky and all the valves are sealing, only take 10 minutes to try vs taking the head off, nothing to lose by trying it.

Be easier to take the whole engine out than to take the head off.

Yer posibly it could seize. Is ur engine an rb20? They is hydrolic lifter so would be rare for anything to cease up I would of thought but ur mate might well be right. But yer if you strip a head down its important to make sure any parts that are being re used go back where they came from.

I have my timing belt and all associated gear off at the moment due to doing some maintenance. God I hate doing it so much. I've done it about 10 times since owning the car and it never gets easier, always end up having no feeling in my fingers for a week.

We will stick a boroscope in there as well, but it takes 15 minutes to change the cam and it takes what 5+ hours to remove the head then gotta do gaskets and all the old hoses that will no doubt snap. I have nothing to lose by putting another cam in and compression testing, takes no time at all, I don't want to pull the head off and find it is all ok in there, and if I pull the head off and its stuffed I need to get another motor anyway.

lysdexia over on the 31 forums said he snapped a cam in a 25 and got off with no bent valves or pistons some how, turned it over hundreds of times as well, cause if the cam snaps wont all the springs try and close all the valves and just put the cam in the position with them all as closed as possible?

cause if the cam snaps wont all the springs try and close all the valves and just put the cam in the position with them all as closed as possible?

it wont though because there is always at least one cylinder with open valves, so my money would be on some valve / piston contact in the cylinders that are at the rear of the motor (the side that had no drive to turn the camshaft)

Edited by Bl4cK32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...