Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Toyota Chaser....nuff said i simply bought the wrong cars when i went shopping

I love 1j/2js...i love all rb's....i even like sr20s (they sound a bit poo but)

Who cares, we all love jap cars....just go after his holden imo, his daily is still a really really really fast car....as you can see weekly at the 1900 of them that enter @ WSID

an aircon vent aimed at my balls so my balls don't get hot.

wisen up - doesn't matter what you drive! ALL our cars are better than a hyundai. and that's what counts!

I laughed so fkn hard at that. Prior to reading this thread I'd been really put off soarers because of a mate of mine's, which had nothingn till like 5k rpm then had heaps, it was really not fun to drive.

They're damn cheap too

oh in case any of you HAVEN'T noticed... i'm just saying things to piss NEE-SAN off. i have nothing to prove.

but seeing as he made a very original joke in comparing soarers to boats:

in stock form.. taken from wikipedia:

neo RB25 = 206 kW at 6400 and 362 Nm @ 3200 rpm

VVTi 1jz = 210 kW at 6200 and 379 Nm @ 2400rpm

^^^however both these figures are as always... rumoured to be higher

these differences are minor. but still. put the two against each other.. 1j makes moar power and moar torque at lower revs.

and it can do it a lot more reliably and do it for a lot more km than the RB25 can unfortunately...

...and now on to your hilarious yacht comment. firstly - i don't care that you have said that. all i'm saying is, it's not funny, it's not original, and you're not creative.

secondly - please, KEEP thinking that. it will help keep knuckle dragging mouth breathing halfwits like you out of soarers.

but let's have a bit of a chat, shall we?

my 1997 vvti soarer Lpackage toyota weighs: 1,540kg

a comparatively aged nissan skyline GTT weighs: 1,410 kg

okay so it's a total of 130kg heavier.

but let's have a quick look at the things MY SOARER has from the factory that a GTT R34 does NOT have.

toyota's safe-T-cell side impact technology

cruise control

sunroof

air purifier

leather upholstery

an aircon vent aimed at my balls so my balls don't get hot.

larger seating capacity and more leg room for my rear passengers

electric seats. with electric lumbar support

digital display which displays the outside temp. how much fuel i have left in my tank. the time. what gear i'm in etc

a digital dash

TEMS electronic in-cockpit damper adjustable suspension

electronic controlled blow off valve

traction control

torsen LSD

and lasty. my soarer does ALL THIS and does it for about 10.4km per litre. oh. and i have very tight coilovers. soooooooo... kinda not a boat anymore.

there is literally NO comparison between soarer and skyline. their price from new will reflect this. they are not and were never marketed to same markets.

soarer is a dedicated luxury sport coupe

skyline is a sport coupe with a sedan counterpart

for what it's worth - the Jzz30 soarer had a career innings of ten years. it had a facelift in 1996. and received a few minor improvements along it's time line...

..but it had an innings of ten years.

skyline went through three generations in this time... :)

reality is - they're BOTH awesome cars..

Come at me Bro,

your not pissing me off, I dont understand why people cant have a discussion without being angry about this sort of stuff.

You did say, the Soarer is a better car then a Skyline in one of your previous posts, which was obviously a bit of stiring which of course I took and gave it back ?

Does that mean we have to wear oversized leather jackets, tie our arms together and have a knife fight whilst surrounded by our peers ?

No !

I like the skyline, because I want more of a sports car, the features you have listed are things that are not important for a sports car, but obviously something you care about having since your not about driving a race car on the street, and that's totally cool.

I get along with all the car ethusiast groups, because I Appreciate cars as a whole, some I like some I don't, well except the VW crowd those guys are homo's LOL jk.

Cmon, a seasoned troll like yourself must be able to see the mirth in a lot of what I've had to say with an underlying message that the JZ engine isn't the king of all engines as people have been led to believe.

The major scene magazines and media are directly responsible for this, as is the fast and the furious with its americacentric snapshot of the tuning scene which then influences a GLOBAL audience.

Remember, Japan is the heart and home of this stuff, and the the relative support and tuning of the JZ is quite underwhelming considering the how the rest of the world seems to be going.

The adelaideprosound dude was the only guy I truly had a go at because he was sprouting bullshit about cylinder heads and involving this thread in overly substantial levels of dickpulling.

For what it's worth, most of my comparison were about the RB26 And the 2JZ, and not Soarers and Skylines.

Anyway, Haters gonna hate, post some tits or I will do a 4wd skid on your lawn and poop in your mail box.

Edited by Nee-san

*a small sigh*

again... most people think of this when they think of soarers:

31714250009_large.jpg

^^^dont laugh too loud.. the owner of this car is european, was involved in a car accident and needed an auto car due to being wheelchair bound... this car also happens to have single turbo 2J

but anyway - when people think of soarer. they think of altezza tail lights and airbrushed paint jobs.. with 20inch tempe rims.

the following is a collection of some of my favourite soarers.

P1.jpg

5e834a5a.jpg

clearcouture-1.jpg

p1CAHTBPGV.jpg

p1CAVURLOP.jpg

4272285945_f24588b05d_b.jpg

P1.jpg

p1.jpg

^^^i now own this car..

p1.jpg

whiteconvertible.jpg

1207857739-17-10595.jpg

Does that mean we have to wear oversized leather jackets, tie our arms together and have a knife fight whilst surrounded by our peers ?

no it doesn't mean that... but can we PLEASE do that!?!?!?! i have ALWAYS wanted to. me and my friend will used to act out fights like this in the coles staffroom.

...me and my friend will got written up for it.

.......me and my friend will regrtted NOTHING.

anyway - as for rest of post - when you put it that way then yeah of course sorry if i peeved you!!!! omg i think i just downloaded a virus.

fuuuuuuuuccckkkkk

oh wait no it was just skype. anwyay

yeah. like - some people like soarers, some people like skylines - as you said... skylines are a "sports" car, which kinda cements my point.. there's no comparison between a soarer luxo coupe... and a skyline sports car

*man hug* <<<<for the knife fight reference!!!

for what it's worth - the Jzz30 soarer had a career innings of ten years. it had a facelift in 1996. and received a few minor improvements along it's time line...

..but it had an innings of ten years.

Erm following this logic, why would you buy a soarer when you could have bought a 300zx? it had an 11 year innings.

Just focus myopically on the SOARER part. Just say "Hey....did you just say....Soarer ??"...."you have a....Soarer...right? I heard that right?"

It doesn't have to make sense if you are giving people shit...you just have to act like you believe it and keep at it! (thank you George Costanza )

oh in case any of you HAVEN'T noticed... i'm just saying things to piss NEE-SAN off. i have nothing to prove.

but seeing as he made a very original joke in comparing soarers to boats:

in stock form.. taken from wikipedia:

neo RB25 = 206 kW at 6400 and 362 Nm @ 3200 rpm

VVTi 1jz = 210 kW at 6200 and 379 Nm @ 2400rpm

^^^however both these figures are as always... rumoured to be higher

these differences are minor. but still. put the two against each other.. 1j makes moar power and moar torque at lower revs.

and it can do it a lot more reliably and do it for a lot more km than the RB25 can unfortunately...

...and now on to your hilarious yacht comment. firstly - i don't care that you have said that. all i'm saying is, it's not funny, it's not original, and you're not creative.

secondly - please, KEEP thinking that. it will help keep knuckle dragging mouth breathing halfwits like you out of soarers.

but let's have a bit of a chat, shall we?

my 1997 vvti soarer Lpackage toyota weighs: 1,540kg

a comparatively aged nissan skyline GTT weighs: 1,410 kg

okay so it's a total of 130kg heavier.

but let's have a quick look at the things MY SOARER has from the factory that a GTT R34 does NOT have.

toyota's safe-T-cell side impact technology

cruise control

sunroof

air purifier

leather upholstery

an aircon vent aimed at my balls so my balls don't get hot.

larger seating capacity and more leg room for my rear passengers

electric seats. with electric lumbar support

digital display which displays the outside temp. how much fuel i have left in my tank. the time. what gear i'm in etc

a digital dash

TEMS electronic in-cockpit damper adjustable suspension

electronic controlled blow off valve

traction control

torsen LSD

and lasty. my soarer does ALL THIS and does it for about 10.4km per litre. oh. and i have very tight coilovers. soooooooo... kinda not a boat anymore.

there is literally NO comparison between soarer and skyline. their price from new will reflect this. they are not and were never marketed to same markets.

soarer is a dedicated luxury sport coupe

skyline is a sport coupe with a sedan counterpart

for what it's worth - the Jzz30 soarer had a career innings of ten years. it had a facelift in 1996. and received a few minor improvements along it's timeline...

..but it had an innings of ten years.

skyline went through three generations in this time... :)

reality is - they're BOTH awesome cars..

You have to take those figures with a grain of salt. The vvti single turbo engine is NOT more powerful than an rb25det.

toyota soarer ; 1jz vvti stock single turbo with BPU's at 12psi = 239rwhp

r33 skyline ; rb25det stock single turbo with BPU's at 10psi = 256rwhp.

Both vehicles were on the same dyno. 20min apart.

Edited by r33cruiser

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...