Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Black is better for dissipating heat apparently

Just to add, NO it is not just normal black paint haha

On my old R34 GTT I had my dumps and front pipe ceremic coated in black and proved the engine bay temperatures dropped by 15-"ish" degrees.

I had the cooling pro turn flow for my old R33 with basic mods: turbo back, 12psi, pods (if these even do anything), and flash tuned by toshi. Before the tune: car was laggy (maybe by 500rpms) but when the boost built up the car definitely performed better. After the tune: no lag, little bit more power but way better response and in general it does help your car stay healthy.

I'm planning to save up for a PWR intercooler for my GTR at the moment which is thicker than standard.

I had an r33 GTS-t which had no mods other than cat-back exhaust and pod.

I put in a big Hybrid FMIC, but unfortunately being a know-nothing chequebook mechanic at the time, it had an entirely unsatisfactory (in retrospect) piping setup whereby it dropped down from the guard in the usual way, went across the front, then had the return pipe snaking back over the radiator to hook up with the cross over manifold.

Don't make the same mistake I did.

Passengers thought it was better but it was just because it became laggier and the power delivery less linear. Boost would come on a lot more suddenly and crack the rear tires loose in corners.

It did stop the heat soak at traffic lights on hot days though.

If you are going FMIC, IMO the best way is to do the job properly and get a front-facing plenum, and set it up GTR style.

Yes, I know, the inlet runner length, I'll have my flamesuit on before the puter posts this up.

Just to add, NO it is not just normal black paint haha

On my old R34 GTT I had my dumps and front pipe ceremic coated in black and proved the engine bay temperatures dropped by 15-"ish" degrees.

I'm planning to save up for a PWR intercooler for my GTR at the moment which is thicker than standard.

yeah but i was talking about a thin coat of black paint on the intercooler not ceramic coated exhausts.

I'm looking at getting one too. I have a 3" turbo back exhaust running 9-10psi, K&N panel filter, dyno tuned to 168rwkw but had problems with my little intercooler heating up and giving us bad runs. I even felt it the other day and it was hot to touch... I wasn't even pushing it.

What gains could I expect... I hear maybe 5-10rwkw according to my tuner, but more so I look forward to reliable power. I don't plan to do a re-tune in the immediate future.

Edited by senilykSkylines

You don't need to get it retuned........wait until you have other mods installed that will affect the tune as well.

You may want to get it tuned???

The thing is, I won't be doing any more power related mods in the near future since the next step is going to cost big $$$; highflow turbo + supporting mods + aftermarket ECU (which is proving diffcult since I want to keep the auto gearbox).

So I guess my question should be: would the bigger FMIC change things sufficiently that a re-tune would get noticeable better results?

Since a basic SAFC 2 tune is only like $100ish, I probably get it re-tuned anyway in the end... :whistling:

Black is better for dissipating heat apparently

I got the black FMIC kit, got black instead of the usual polished metal colour mainly for stealth than anything else.

Edited by Mayuri Krab

The thing is, I won't be doing any more power related mods in the near future since the next step is going to cost big $$$; highflow turbo + supporting mods + aftermarket ECU (which is proving diffcult since I want to keep the auto gearbox).

So I guess my question should be: would the bigger FMIC change things sufficiently that a re-tune would get noticeable better results?

Since a basic SAFC 2 tune is only like $100ish, I probably get it re-tuned anyway in the end... :whistling:

I got the black FMIC kit, got black instead of the usual polished metal colour mainly for stealth than anything else.

yeah i got a black one thinking it was anodized but turns out ws powdercoat which i was advised was not good so I stripped it (that was fun) pretty sure it will make next to zero difference but boredom can do strange things to a man.

oh to the guy running 168kw , i was doing 185kw with stock cooler and no problems so dont expect a cooler to solve it, Id say you might have other issues

Convincing thread.....

....I'm going to remove my 100mm FMIC and just plumb the turbos straight to the intake.

----

Look it's as simple as this. When you move large amounts of air, it heats. What??!?! Yes. Ever felt the air coming from a vacuum? Or compressor piping? Turbo charge follows the same princible. Now as you compress more and more air, it gets hotter. Sure, physically hot turbos are also a factor, but lets put that aside for now.

Now, cold air has a higher density. So more oxygen atoms can fit in the same cubic foot of air. Since the limitation of power is (usually) how much air we can fit in the engine, having a cooler charge temperature will increase power once you tune the fuel map to reflect the change in oxygen density. In a sense, it's like upping the boost by a minute amount.

Also, having a cooler intake charge will mean you can somewhat advance the timing, and again, make even more safe power.

If your intercooler isn't up for the job. The heated charge air will be hotter going in, hotter during combustion, and hotter coming out. This physically heats the turbo, and the charge air is now hotter again. That hot air goes back in, becomes even hotter, etc. I proper sized intercooler will stabilise this. You don't buy an intercooler to make big power, but to make safe big power.

It's that simple.

In regards to black intercoolers it's simple thermal dynamics:

If your heat sink will work in the air flow of a fan, the contribution of radiation will be extremely small, compared to the effect of conduction. So, it's best to leave the aluminum bare, as any layer of black paint, with its lower thermal conductivity, will hamper the conduction of heat from aluminum to air more than it may help by increasing radiation.

In other words, don't paint an intercooler if you want the best results. It's a well known fact aluminium oxidizes and corrodes over time, and paint can increase longevity. So why don't the smart, highly paid engineers paint them?

In other words, don't paint an intercooler if you want the best results. It's a well known fact aluminium oxidizes and corrodes over time, and paint can increase longevity. So why don't the smart, highly paid engineers paint them?

Painting it black helps its heat sink characteristics. The r32 GTR's had black painted intercooler cores (at least up to ~1992). I don't think it was until the 34 that they started making them raw alloy. As to the why - why do people do anything? why do idiots remove the nice, lightweight, forged alloys from their cars and replace them with big stupid chrome rims that are heavier and redice handling? Because of aesthetics. Big alloy coolers look cool hanging out the front of a bumper, and manufacturers know this.

THe vast majority of *factory* coolers I have seen are painted black.

Convincing thread.....

....I'm going to remove my 100mm FMIC and just plumb the turbos straight to the intake.

----

That's why the VL turbo was so amazingly powerful ph34r.gif

yeah i got a black one thinking it was anodized but turns out ws powdercoat which i was advised was not good so I stripped it (that was fun) pretty sure it will make next to zero difference but boredom can do strange things to a man.

oh to the guy running 168kw , i was doing 185kw with stock cooler and no problems so dont expect a cooler to solve it, Id say you might have other issues

I have an auto so apparently if it was a manual it would be doing 190ish... All I know is when the cooler is cold it pulls hard right through (and with the knock sensor turned off) but when it is hot it literally stops accelerating at 4000rpm and then suddenly carries on (knock sensor turned on). Tuner thought it was the hot intercooler causing detonation and the knock sensor was kicking in. He tried multiple variations of afr but it came down to the intercooler we thought. Sometimes he would get 130rwkw on the dyno and the other time got 168rwkw depending on the temp of the intercooler and the knock sensor kicking in.

Better not be something else : l

Painting it black helps its heat sink characteristics. The r32 GTR's had black painted intercooler cores (at least up to ~1992). I don't think it was until the 34 that they started making them raw alloy. As to the why - why do people do anything? why do idiots remove the nice, lightweight, forged alloys from their cars and replace them with big stupid chrome rims that are heavier and redice handling? Because of aesthetics. Big alloy coolers look cool hanging out the front of a bumper, and manufacturers know this.

THe vast majority of *factory* coolers I have seen are painted black.

What I posted wasn't off the top of my head. It's fact. Actually, a line or two I pulled from another document relating to thermal dynamics. Painting aluminium flat black will increase it's ability to themally radiate. Yes, you're right there.

But.

In coating aluminium in paint (even a thin layer) you reduce it's ability to thermally conduct. Aluminium heatskinks (including intercoolers, they are part of this family) are designed for thermal conduction, not thermal radiation. The only time a heatsink uses thermal radiation is if there is no airflow. Nobody cares how many kW you're gonna get idling in heavy traffic. Thermal conduction begins when the car moves... And I'll guess most of the time you're on boost will be with the car moving.

Having a black intercooler achieves a much more standard, factory look. It does NOT increase cooling efficiency trhough conduction. Back then the majority of cars had painted black copper/steel radiators. Now we use unpainted aluminium. We didn't see the radiator before, we hardly see them now, so why the change? Copper is even better at thermal conduction than aluminium too, but price and weight, it's not worth the extra 20% conduction you get from it.

Another example is oldschool hot water radiators people would have outside to generate heat. They'd paint them black to absorb the radiant heat, which creates more heat. It also helps to block thermal conduction, again, increasing the heat further.

Have a read on thermal dynamics, it's got all the info right there.

I have an auto so apparently if it was a manual it would be doing 190ish... All I know is when the cooler is cold it pulls hard right through (and with the knock sensor turned off) but when it is hot it literally stops accelerating at 4000rpm and then suddenly carries on (knock sensor turned on). Tuner thought it was the hot inter-cooler causing detonation and the knock sensor was kicking in. He tried multiple variations of afr but it came down to the inter-cooler we thought. Sometimes he would get 130rwkw on the dyno and the other time got 168rwkw depending on the temp of the intercooler and the knock sensor kicking in.

Better not be something else : l

You still got the stock R33 SMIC or a upgraded R34 SMIC?

If it is still the R33 (tiny) SMIC, it would be heat soaking pretty bad with the upped boost.

My car is auto as well & before I got my black FMIC installed, I had a R34 SMIC in there with the usual bolt on mods (exhaust, POD, boost TEE) + SAFC 2 & the car made ~180rwkw on a average temperature day in Perth (that was about 1.5 years ago though).

Edited by Mayuri Krab

What I posted wasn't off the top of my head. It's fact. Actually, a line or two I pulled from another document relating to thermal dynamics. Painting aluminium flat black will increase it's ability to themally radiate. Yes, you're right there.

But.

In coating aluminium in paint (even a thin layer) you reduce it's ability to thermally conduct. Aluminium heatskinks (including intercoolers, they are part of this family) are designed for thermal conduction, not thermal radiation. The only time a heatsink uses thermal radiation is if there is no airflow. Nobody cares how many kW you're gonna get idling in heavy traffic. Thermal conduction begins when the car moves... And I'll guess most of the time you're on boost will be with the car moving.

Having a black intercooler achieves a much more standard, factory look. It does NOT increase cooling efficiency trhough conduction. Back then the majority of cars had painted black copper/steel radiators. Now we use unpainted aluminium. We didn't see the radiator before, we hardly see them now, so why the change? Copper is even better at thermal conduction than aluminium too, but price and weight, it's not worth the extra 20% conduction you get from it.

Another example is oldschool hot water radiators people would have outside to generate heat. They'd paint them black to absorb the radiant heat, which creates more heat. It also helps to block thermal conduction, again, increasing the heat further.

Have a read on thermal dynamics, it's got all the info right there.

Volumetric efficiency, Thermal efficiency and Mechanical efficiency are all good reads especially in relation to engines, IMO. :thumbsup:

236 was exhaust pod and boost tee. stock 33 cooler

266 was 6 months later but only change was Hybrid FMIC

was while ago so cant remember exact but think run after run was 236,218,210. after cooler 266,264,264

feeling was noticable on the road.

unfortunately scale is slightly different

post-24655-0-51236200-1301057890_thumb.jpg

post-24655-0-02250100-1301057910_thumb.jpg

You still got the stock R33 SMIC or a upgraded R34 SMIC?

If it is still the R33 (tiny) SMIC, it would be heat soaking pretty bad with the upped boost.

My car is auto as well & before I got my black FMIC installed, I had a R34 SMIC in there with the usual bolt on mods (exhaust, POD, boost TEE) + SAFC 2 & the car made ~180rwkw on a average temperature day in Perth (that was about 1.5 years ago though).

Nah just the R33 SMIC. What do you do now power wise with your FMIC?

I have a feeling my Z32 chips knock sensor is rather sensitive :) When we turned it off it just lit up the wheels in second at 50km and 70km (in the wet) where as with it turned on it wouldn't (unless turning slightly), it would have that flat spot.

How does the heat transfer coefficient of naturally occurring aluminium oxide compare to a very thin layer of specialised paint? Normal aluminium oxide needs only be incredibly thin to adequately prevent further corrosion, so despite the far more conductive paints available they probably cannot make up for the thickness of the coat of paint.

The layer of oxidised aluminium is thin and relatively fragile, which is why anodising is used to create a strong hardy layer to prevent further corrosion pretty much permanently. Depending on how this is done, ie what thickness is achieved, it can be thick enough that a paint is more efficient for convection heat dissipation.

All in all, black is stealth laughing-smiley-014.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...