Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My car is currently running 280rwkw on 98 and was just wanting opinions whether or not my fuel setup is good enough. I've got a Bosch 040 pump and nismo 740cc injectors. Injectors are hitting 62-64% currently when giving it the pedal but am more concerned about the fuel pump. Will I need something like an 044 or will the 040 be enough for what I need. Chasing around 320-330kw

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/361159-e85-do-i-have-enough-fuel/
Share on other sites

The common belief is that you will use 30% more fuel on E85 though some people i have talked to would say its more closer to 40%

Id say u might need bigger injectors as u dont want to run your injectors past 85% duty cycle

not sure about the feul pump though id say ud probs have to upgrade to 044 just for safety

injectors are definately fine, seeing as I make that power with nismo 555's on e85

as for the pump an 044 is definatley enough, however i'm not 100% on the 040.

if you want to buy a new one i'd look at the nismo intank pump.

Ive been running a 33gtr Tomei on e85 for over a year now with no issues. The lowly Walbro has been heavily tested with it, no problems reported and there are plenty of people on ethanol with 044's aren't there?

I agree, the bearings may fail after a few years in any pump as there is virtually no lubrication with ethanol. The higher petrol percentages like Caltex Eflex (E70) may be better but essentially when the pump starts squealing you will need to replace it, which is part of the reason I like the twin Walbro HP setups (low cost).

You might aswell go a surge tank setup with a 044 itll cost you pretty much the same price as just buying the nismo on its own and atleast now youll know you wont have fuel problems if you track the car.

I'm trying to keep things in tank swell as I have had cops looking behind my boot carpet for a fuel setup.

Should have made it clear that I will be running the Caltex eflex so hopefully the pump will survive a title while.

Cheers for you input guys

yep my walbro coped fine with the E85 for about 18months i had it on the GTT and the new owner is running E85 as well, so we're well over 2 years now with E85 and walbro - just made 110% sure i got a genuine one initially

  • 10 months later...

Sorry to dig up an old thread.

I have a very simular setup to Kris, only real difference being cams. Anyhow I very recently got my car tuned for 349rwkw on E85 with a 3076 @ 20psi

I have 740 nismo injectors and a single intank bosch 040 (which had the restrictor in the banjo bolt drilled out and 1-way valve removed to get more fuel delivery). Pump is probably only 2 months old if that (changed pumps as previous 040 was 3 years old and completely gone). About 3 days ago I started missing bad up top and getting high knock readings where engine was leaning out (timings fine, sparks fine), the problem got progressively worse also the pump has become VERY loud as soon as the problem started (groaning and humming).

Tonight I took it for a drive and pump sounds completely stuffed and I cant take it over 3k without it spluttering its head off - same issue when last pump died..

One thing to note is the car was fine when I was using Caltex E-flex, I believe the problem started shortly after using a few tanks of United which has a higher E%

So my question is what is the best solution for my setup and power level. I would rather keep my fuel system intank if possible but if I have to run external pumps I will.

I was thinking about replacing the 040 but this time leaving the banjo bolt as is and also running an inline 044.. Or would a single intank Nismo pump flow enough for my power level?

Cheers

I have 740 nismo injectors and a single intank bosch 040 (which had the restrictor in the banjo bolt drilled out and 1-way valve removed to get more fuel delivery). Pump is probably only 2 months old if that (changed pumps as previous 040 was 3 years old and completely gone). About 3 days ago I started missing bad up top and getting high knock readings where engine was leaning out (timings fine, sparks fine), the problem got progressively worse also the pump has become VERY loud as soon as the problem started (groaning and humming).

Tonight I took it for a drive and pump sounds completely stuffed and I cant take it over 3k without it spluttering its head off - same issue when last pump died..

Even though you were using a 040, but is the consesus still that a Bosch 044 mounted intank will die a premature death if using E85?

Very curious as I'm running a 044 intank and I want to switch to E85 but just wondering if anyone has ran E85 since the last post and had good results :thumbsup:

Edited by turbodragon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...