Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Im currently in the process in upgrading my throttle body to one with an 80mm butterfly for my r33 gtst. I noticed that the throttle i purchased need a tps (throttle position sensor) from a series 1.

Considering my r33 is a 94 model i was positve the tps I had was a series 1 but it doesnt seem so, my r33 gtst must be series 1.5 or 2 becuase it has individual coils, no amplifier and other things which seem similar to series 2 including the tps, which has 2 plugs but seems only one is in use.

Do I need a tps at all with my new throttle body, reason I ask is i read somewhere that with an aftermarket computer with map sensor that a tps is no longer necessary.

Can anyone verify as im a little confused.

Cheers

Bruno

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363561-tps-and-map-sensor/
Share on other sites

well im running map sensor ecu and my hand controller tells me my throttle position so yes you will need it

Nah man you don't need it. Just cos you're hand controller says so, doesn't mean it needs it.

You can tune a car based on just a MAP sensor fine. My car has a cable throttle (it used to have a fly by-wire) and it has no TPS installed, and is tuned perfectly. Would be handy to have a TPS for idle control, but you can work around it.

In short, you'll need a TPS sensor for the stock computer, but as soon as you have say, a Haltech, Wolf 3D, EMS, Adaptronic (maybe), Autronic etc... you can ditch the TPS.

HTH

Most ECUs will require a TPS signal so it knows:

1. Throttle closed so the ECU can control "injector shutdown on overrun".

2. Throttle closed so the ECU knows when to activate "idle" programming.

3. (sometimes) when the throttle has been snapped open (acceleration enrichment).

BTW, I'm running Wolf, and use the TPS for all of the above.

TPS isnt required with an aftermarket ecu, it just helps improve the tune.

With drive by wire electronic throttles there is a resistor on the pedal telling the ecu what your foot wants it to do, that will do fine as a tps signal if you dont have one StealthX.

TPS isnt required with an aftermarket ecu, it just helps improve the tune.

With drive by wire electronic throttles there is a resistor on the pedal telling the ecu what your foot wants it to do, that will do fine as a tps signal if you dont have one StealthX.

Yeah I still use the pedal sensor for the 4WD system. Don't need one for ignition or injection...

well thanks guys that has certainly cleared up a few things for me, got a few prices on an r33 series 1 tps and most wreckers around are asking from $75-$130 for a tps, and pretty much all of them are out of stock at present. To tell you the truth not sure if my Link ecu even has that feature that recognises the tps, although it is direct plugin, best way to find out how it runs without a tps is to unplug the tps,drive around and see how it idles,

Does anyone know if the tps from a r33 series 1 will directly plugin to series 2?

Edited by Bruno P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...