Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Too many variables, eg.

* If a car with standard power hits the rev limiter in top gear (unlikely) then you can quadruple the horsepower, it will get there quicker, but will still not go any faster, because the motor is turning the same gearing as fast as it can.

* If we take the same car and with all of the engine work decide to rev it 1000rpm harder, so increase the rev limiter, it will go faster, but not because of the horsepower

* If the car however does not have the grunt to turn top gear to the limiter then more horsepower will make it faster.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5805618
Share on other sites

I thought so, explains why Monaros are so slow!

my dad used to race his HG monaro (308 gts) @ ravenswood raceway back in the day....his fastest time was a 13.2, mildly worked making about 325rwhp....was running a 4.11 diff ratio.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5805969
Share on other sites

my dad used to race his HG monaro (308 gts) @ ravenswood raceway back in the day....his fastest time was a 13.2, mildly worked making about 325rwhp....was running a 4.11 diff ratio.

haha. Mine had a HJ Monaro with a well worked 308 but 3.08s in the rear was good for 14sec. But fully loaded with a trailer would sit on 160km happy to do 200 fully loaded with no trailer

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5805977
Share on other sites

haha. Mine had a HJ Monaro with a well worked 308 but 3.08s in the rear was good for 14sec. But fully loaded with a trailer would sit on 160km happy to do 200 fully loaded with no trailer

nice

my brothers 308 hg gts is running about 350rwhp and that ran a 12.9sec with slightly taller ratio than the 4.11

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5806011
Share on other sites

will a car acheive higher top end speeds with power alone or does gearing need to be changed to go faster..

Power:weight ratio determines low-speed acceleration (for a certain set of gear ratios).

Power:drag determines high speed acceleration/top speed (for a certain set of gear ratios). At a certain point wind resistance becomes so high that it relegates inertia due to mass to a relatively negligible amount when determining the maximums.

Speed is a factor of engine speed and gear ratio (in the gearbox and final drive) so the amount of power you're making does not have a direct relationship.

As others have said, if you're hitting the rev limiter in top gear with your existing power, all that adding more power is going to do is mean you will get to that speed in a shorter time.

However, if with your existing power you're not able to rev out top gear (which will be due to drag) then adding more power will increase your top speed. Of course, if adding more power meant increasing drag (say if you needed to open up the front of the car to get more air onto your heat exchangers) then your gains might not be as high as you'd first think.

One this topic, will shorter gearing give you faster acceleration, or will both cars accelerate at a similar pace? What's the advantage of short gears?

Shorter gears may give you faster acceleration. It depends on the situation. Shorter gearing will give you better acceleration in a certain gear, but note that your ground speed in that gear at a certain RPM will be lower. Whether its worth it or not is up to the conditions.

As an example, with the stock 3.5 FD in my car I'd be able to hold 3rd gear all the way around Wakefield after the main straight. With my new 3.9 I keep having to grab 4th and use about half its rev band (and then back into 3rd for some corners). Every time you change gear you decelerate while your engine is disconnected from your wheels, as drag and parasitic loss still act upon your car. Those extra gearchanges have actually cost me laptimes (both in terms of outright time and consistency) at Wakefield Park.

By the same token, at Eastern Creek where I was constantly making 3rd-4th interchanges. I should be able to avoid using 3rd so much now, and getting rid of those gearchanges should mean that I'm quicker at EC (I can't wait to get out there and find out, my Wakefield experiences have gotten me a bit annoyed at this FD).

My car also used to top out 4th gear at the end of the quarter. I'd pretty much hit the cutout just after crossing the line. With the shorter FD I'd now have to grab 5th. It's hard to say whether the extra in-gear acceleration is worth the trade-off on having to make the extra shift (and being more likely to wheelspin out the hole) but I'm suspecting I'm now a fraction slower.

Note that I've got a pretty close ratio box stock. On a car with long ratios, like Falcodores, shortening the FD is probably a good thing for acceleration in most circumstances.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5806036
Share on other sites

when talking top speed it isn't just about gearing. taller gearing can actually lower the top speed. i think it was the VR HSV GTS that had a top speed of 250kmh in 5th gear and only 217kmh in 6th because the gearing was too tall to overcome the wind resistance. very few cars on the road will actually hit the rev limiter in top gear in stock form. a lot would actually have higher top speeds with fractionally shorter gearing, but car companies don't worry about this sort of thing as they aim for top gear to rev in a nice fat torque range on the highway to give good fuel economy as well as stop you having to drop down gears at the slightest incline. top speed is all about overcoming air resistance and the faster you go the more it takes to go that little bit faster.

as for shorter gearing increasing acceleration, the short answer is yes. this is why first gear accelerates faster than 5th gear. a commodore or falcon with a shorter diff ratio will be much faster than a stock one in a drag race. first gear in an auto commodore (older 4 speed autos) is nearly the same as second gear in a manual skyline (once diff ratios are taken into account).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5807026
Share on other sites

The first reply to the thread nailed it. Marc's post there has some pretty good information too.

It all depends on what you're aiming for. You set a goal, then you change all the variables to shoot for that goal. If I want to drag people to 100km/h I'll use the standard 4.11 diff in my Skyline because 2nd gear tops out around that and if it was any shorter I'd need another gear change, which will cost me time. If we're dragging to 80km/h I'll put a 4.36 in the car, because even though 2nd gear will now top out around 90-95, I only need 80 of that and the shorter ratio will give slightly better acceleration.

If you calculate it, a standard R33 GTS-T has the gearing to achieve ~277km/h (forget the exact figure). Realistically you'll only get to around 250 because you'll run out of torque. Shorten the diff a bit and you might get 255 thanks to the extra torque of the gearing. Shorten it too much and you'll only get 230 because your car will redline in top gear at this speed. Make it too tall (say 2.5:1) and you'll have a theoretical top speed of 400km/h+ with only enough torque to get to 160-170. But 1000hp behind that ratio and you'll propel the car to around 320. There are lots of variables to it all.

All hypotheticals for the purpose of examples^

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5807229
Share on other sites

the wind resistance. very few cars on the road will actually hit the rev limiter in top gear in stock form. a lot would actually have higher top speeds with fractionally shorter gearing, but car companies don't worry about this sort of thing as they aim for top gear to rev in a nice fat torque range on the highway to give good fuel economy as well as stop you having to drop down gears at the slightest incline. top speed is all about overcoming air resistance and the faster you go the more it takes to go that little bit faster.

as for shorter gearing increasing acceleration, the short answer is yes. this is why first gear accelerates faster than 5th gear. a commodore or falcon with a shorter diff ratio will be much faster than a stock one in a drag race. first gear in an auto commodore (older 4 speed autos) is nearly the same as second gear in a manual skyline (once diff ratios are taken into account).

I never thought that I would change my opinion again, but your argument moved me in way that I've never known.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/363835-more-top-end/#findComment-5807415
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...