Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've recently had my R33 gts-t series 1 RB25 tuned with the following NEW mods: Garrett GT 3076 AR 0.60, Apexi Power FC, Apexi AVC-R, Nismo 740cc injectors, Z32 AFM, Walbro Intake fuel pump 255l/hr 500hp rated, Super Spark coilpacks, Apexi Power intake, 3' Exhaust turbo back, FMIC, NGK plugs gapped to 0.75mm, running on BP Ultimate 98, and this is the end result...

post-80081-0-55921700-1305704576_thumb.jpg

As you can see, the turbo is very laggy, and max power output of only 230.8rwkw @ 15psi. I believe the tuner has done best he can with the setup. How can I possibly get more power and response from the car, as quite honestly it was more fun to drive with the stock turbo @ 1bar of boost?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Id drop the exhaust before the cat and do another run.

But to be honest the 3076 doesnt really wake up until 18+ psi

and the response looks pretty good to me.

So check for obvious retrictions in the exhaust, and drop it for the next dyno run, Im not sure its that as the power doesnt drop off up top.

next would be throw more boost at the thing and see if the power goes up.

Only other thing I feel worth mentioning is, that the .63 will be choking the 76mm comp wheel, so you will never get the most from the turbo.

Is it internal gate or external gate?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/#findComment-5819220
Share on other sites

Power curve looks about right. Could be that the dyno is reading lower than others. Are you running the stock intake pipe from the pod filter to the turbo?

Is there a reason your only running at that boost level? Seems abit low

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/#findComment-5819289
Share on other sites

Have a look at Lithium's chart post #625 http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/55845-rb25-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/page__st__620

He has stock manifolds on an unopened engine. Has gone to some trouble to get it to hold boost (you need more boost) and has a .86 AR making 300kw but still with better response than yours.

Maybe you need an external wastegate, better boost control and maybe try another tuner.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/#findComment-5819987
Share on other sites

The boost curve on that looks much like when I had the soft actuator, get a big can actuator and that'll really liven things up - the one supplied seems to open at about 11-12psi no matter what you do and makes it feel quite lazy.

In regards to the power made, mine still made pretty decent power on 15psi - GT3076Rs work fairly well at 1bar still, they just come into their own versus small turbos at higher boost... more due to the smaller turbos maxing out than the GT3076R NEEDING lots of boost.

Maybe that dyno is particularly harsh? Does it feel fairly quick on the road once boost is built up or is it definitely feeling like the 230kw number suggests?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/#findComment-5820013
Share on other sites

something must be wrong

3076 on 15psi should make alot more then 230kw. more round 260kw mark.. and 300kw around 18-20psi

uve got issues u need 2 sort out.

I've got a Garret GT3071 (smaller than the 3076)on my R34, and I get 260rwKW at only 16PSI, and the response is just as good as the factory turbo. Next I'll be putting the boost up to 18PSI with the hope of getting about 280rwKW.

Paul

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/#findComment-5820105
Share on other sites

On any sensible reading dyno, I have no idea how 230kw is what could be considered as realistic for a GT3076R running a bit of boost into it - unless it was an RB20.

agreed....you'd get that out of a std turbo...lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/#findComment-5820672
Share on other sites

Can OP please note if a custom dump had to be made and if a spacer had to be used on the manifold or if the turbo bolted up and used the same dump pipe design as the stock turbo?

If no spacer and same dump flange as stock then the rear housing is one of those choker RB specific items, if not the response actually looks fine and a high strength actuator at 20psi should be employed.

I think that will wake it up as stated prior but only if its the Garrett housing and not the special skyline one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/#findComment-5821388
Share on other sites

I have similar issue as you I want to crack 300rwkw On my r34 GTT I made 343rwhp @ 20 psi which is 255rwkw roughly, anyway I think there might be a leak somewhere possibly (GFB stealth blow off plumed back) if I open the valve it feels lagy once shut it feels bit more responsive.

i have standard actuator that came with turbo ,like Lith said probably need to get Big can Actuator or weld external gate to exhaust housing its an option.

mods

-Gt3076R from (Tweakit ) internal Gate turbine Housing 0.76a/r

-3"1/2 inch turbo back exhaust with high flow cat

-Low mount 6boost manifold

-Tomie Type B cams and exhaust tomie cam gear

-Deutschworks 600 cc injectors

-PFC

-Plazaman Inlet Plenum and Throttle body

-Z32 AFM

-Splitfire coils

-Walbro fuel pump

-Hks 100mm FMIC

-Sard fuel pressure regulator

and other supporting mod's

post-73281-0-38005300-1305810185_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/#findComment-5821894
Share on other sites

why go 6 boost then use a horrible tweakit internal housing? i'd say that'd be your biggest problem, also being a hyperdrive tune it'd be on the conservative side.

boost control could do with some attention aswell

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/#findComment-5821906
Share on other sites

At 20psi [and the supporting mods] you would be making 300rwkw with a genuine 3076. You have the supporting mods.

And leaning out at 4-45000rpm, do you get any knock?

I am surprised that ppl don't do more research before they slam 2g's on the table for a turbo - plus all the other $$$$for peripherals and tune etc. There is enough info on this site for anyone to see what they can expect when they buy Turbo brand XX to know that in some instances you have to either be happy with a 'restricted' performance or walk away!!!

And if your ever unsure, slip somebody a PM and talk to them. There are plenty on here that I annoyed before I made the decision........but thankfully I listened to them and followed their advice [son of rajab knows why, I'm usually so pigheaded].

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/364723-gt3076-tuning/#findComment-5822157
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...