Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Couple of interesting alternatives are available atm to the usual Walbro GSS-341/Bosch 040 options:

AEROMOTIVE 340LPH 340 LPH 90PSI HIGH FLOW FUEL PUMP

These are pretty new I think, looks physically almost identical to the Walbro, claimed 340LPH flow, available on (ebay) here:

http://cgi.ebay.com/...n#ht_4609wt_933

some Supra-related info:

http://www.supraforu...w-charts-review

...and...

Deatschwerks DW300+

These look promising and cheap at $169 US thereabouts (considering the exchange rate)... claimed 300+ LPH.

http://www.deatschwe...-tank-fuel-pump

Look like the Walbro pump again, no Skyline-specific model fitments listed but here are the physical dimensions:

http://www.deatschwe...fuel-pump-tech/

Anyone used either of these? Anybody have any recommendations? I don't know where fuel pumps are really at these days... everybody still use the Walbros, or...?

cheers

DaveB

Edited by DaveB
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/366829-aeromotive-fuel-pump/
Share on other sites

the 040 is too big for the stock setup

get the walbro, a guy down here in tas just bought a genuine one off ebay brand new for $140

same size as stock, easy to install, proven and cheap

One thing about both of these models is that they claim significantly higher flow rates than the walbro (300-340 as to 255) which I believe has poorer flow rate performance unless it's hard-wired anyway (though to be fair probably all pumps do?). Just something to consider...

the main thing to remember is that the c34's don't have a cradle like the skylines but instead have a box that clips to the bottom of the fuel tank

2011-01-29124455.jpg

so going any bigger than stock will be a big pain to fit nicely without hacking up the box

I was looking to run one of these but they were twice the price and they also draw twice the current. I came to the conclusion they are great if you cant fit twin Walbro's in, as the twins will flow more at a similar current. Of course not too many people will need a 1000hp ethanol system anyway.

Tom, that plastic box looks very similar to what the m35 has. It may not allow enough fuel to enter the container if you run the larger aeromotive pump as I have found with the twins. Its only a problem at under 1/4 tank.

I was looking to run one of these but they were twice the price and they also draw twice the current. I came to the conclusion they are great if you cant fit twin Walbro's in, as the twins will flow more at a similar current. Of course not too many people will need a 1000hp ethanol system anyway.

Tom, that plastic box looks very similar to what the m35 has. It may not allow enough fuel to enter the container if you run the larger aeromotive pump as I have found with the twins. Its only a problem at under 1/4 tank.

1000hp or 1000cc's??? farrrrrrrk

:woot:

So lets throw an ace in the pack hear

2x walbros = what..? 510lph?

To burn even 1 full capacity of a walbro you wd need serioisly big inj, running huge duty cycles.... With a tune and car to suit....

Why in gods cock would u need anything more than the quiet, easy to install, cheap, more than enough flowing walbro...:)

So lets throw an ace in the pack hear

2x walbros = what..? 510lph?

To burn even 1 full capacity of a walbro you wd need serioisly big inj, running huge duty cycles.... With a tune and car to suit....

Why in gods cock would u need anything more than the quiet, easy to install, cheap, more than enough flowing walbro...:)

because they only flow 255lph at some shitty low fuel pressure

ah just found the chart, they also only flow 255lph with no fuel lines attached, Ill assume the Stag lines are 5/16" same as the Skylines...so try and blow 255lph through a long maccas straw.

Bosch_044_vs_Walbro_255HP.JPG

please show me how it would be benefitial to have 2x walbros...

stock 25 inj run at 370cc... so all 6 at 100% duty (never come close to that safe) is 2220cc/per min...

1x walbro flows with no lines at 4250cc per min...

even half the flow rate for lines witch would never ever happen... and you could still run your injectors at ~99.6% duty... if someone was stupid enough to run this higher %. they deserve to be kicked in the head lol....

please show me how it would be benefitial to have 2x walbros...

stock 25 inj run at 370cc... so all 6 at 100% duty (never come close to that safe) is 2220cc/per min...

1x walbro flows with no lines at 4250cc per min...

even half the flow rate for lines witch would never ever happen... and you could still run your injectors at ~99.6% duty... if someone was stupid enough to run this higher %. they deserve to be kicked in the head lol....

scott upgraded the fuel lines to braided SS , pressure reg, and 1000cc injectors.

hence: beneficial to have teo walbro pumps.. the way its set up is, one pump runs one fuel rail(theres two as v6) so makes if efficient!

1000cc is just the spec of inj....

what sort of duty is he running... all these mods mean nothing more than the amount of fuel the car ACTUALY chews per min...

im not saying what hes done is wrong or right... just wondering why he has done what he has more than anything.

and wouldnt the braided lines flow much better than stock...?

having 6000cc worth of inj

and 8500 worth of fuel suply,

at 100% duty. he has 30% or so too much fuel b4 the lines... leaving him well ahead.

what sort of % would he run?

Edited by chef_stagea

he maxed out the fuel lines on the last run. with the gtx going in he wanted to be safe so he knows that atleast his fuel system will be able to cope.

i think i recall him saying that he had already made the twin pump setup before he found the problem to be the lines, so he used i9n anyway.

but can definitely see your point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...