Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know what the thickness of the 34 is? (and 33?) Is there much difference in size? etc

I can see the R33 has 15 rows while the 34 has 18, so im also wondering about thickness.

lastly, can both intercoolers be directly interchanged? I know people will just tell me to get a FMIC, but I aint.

thanks

Edited by ausdrift
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/366939-33-vs-34-standard-intercooler/
Share on other sites

Waste of time and money, get something decent we have seen core temps of close to 70 c on the r34 coolers on mild boost applications... they heat soak about a run or two later than the std r33 one... useless for track days or any sort of hill run type work.

Sure, but if you factor in ease of installation / price the R34 SMIC is not as bad as you say.

Of course it is not a replacement for a FMIC but still an improvement to the R33 unit.

Waste of time and money, get something decent we have seen core temps of close to 70 c on the r34 coolers on mild boost applications... they heat soak about a run or two later than the std r33 one... useless for track days or any sort of hill run type work.

  • 2 weeks later...

I put one of my r33. Its an easy direct replacement for the standard one, didnt even have to take my front bar off. Was also a $50 item, so i figured for my light street duties it would be plenty good enough.

Having said that, since then i have seen plenty of users saying that they suffer nearly as badly as the 33 item from heat soak, and to not even consider them if the car will be used at the track or driven hard etc. I plan on doing a few track days in the future so i bought one of the jjr return flow stealth black fmic. The way i see it, it cost me $500 new, roughly only double what a day at the track will cost- so i think its a good investment for performance if the car is getting a rough time, plus peace of mind. I just think its probably worth really considering the fmic, especially since your user name is ausdrift.. lol. thumbsup.gif

Mate ya still asking about these intercoolers, this is the 3rd thread so far. To answer your question for this thread, compared to a straight piece of pipe they are good. Stop being a tight arse and get a front mount. If you can afford to own and drive a skyline you can afford a front mount setup. If you are looking at a intercooler upgrade that means you floor it sometimes and that means front mount. Now go buy one. NOW!!! :domokun:

x2 ^

I went the 34 route. It was "ok".

Unless you can get the funnel thing and have the air ramming through it with no leaks, they will heatsoak just driving around.

I found that even cruising along at 100k, and a little city driving i could stop and burn myself on both sides of the intercooler. lol.

And for reference, heres the difference. From memory the R34 is 70-75mm. In that area.

OldvsNewTop.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...