Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Four simple questions about boosting a RB25DET from a R33.

1, What is standard boost?

2, What is the maximum boost that the stock turbos can handle? (or what boost level should i keep it under)

3, If I have a pod filter, slightly bigger SMIC and turbo back exhaust with sports catalyser, what boost will it naturally creap up to?

4, Whats the typical bog standard R33 rwKw figure and what might it be with the mods from question 3?

Thanks all

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/367031-4-simple-boost-questions-for-r33/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

7

10

without a ebc/valve 8 maybe?????

140/160

I concur.

Do you concur?

The pod filter will be entirely useless and not help power goals at all. It will also greatly increase the "I've got a stock turbo that spools even when I am being overtaken up a hill by a corrola sound"....which is the most ghey aspect of any R33 GTST ownership experience.

If you get a good full exhaust, panel filter, R34 side mount then you will probably make more than 160rwkw, perhaps closer to 170rwkw (if it matters). If you plan on changing the turbo skip the R34 side mount step, and add a Front mount WHEN you install the larger turbo.

Edited by simpletool

OP, off topic, but love your avatar... brings back memories when i went to japan for a holiday ahhh...the food is cheap and awesome there!

I'd chime in, but everyone else has already answered your questions.

7psi

12psi

anyone's guess

140rwkw stock boost

Search IS your friend.

At what stage does it hit R+R or experience knock [without an ecu or bender]???? Don't answer, I don't care, its a rhetoric question.

Four simple questions about boosting a RB25DET from a R33.

1, What is standard boost?

2, What is the maximum boost that the stock turbos can handle? (or what boost level should i keep it under)

3, If I have a pod filter, slightly bigger SMIC and turbo back exhaust with sports catalyser, what boost will it naturally creap up to?

4, Whats the typical bog standard R33 rwKw figure and what might it be with the mods from question 3?

Thanks all

The other guys have answered already, but mine atm has the mods you have listed on 3, and it hits 9psi naturally. Mine bog stock was 145rwkw (huge lol) but not sure what it is with the extra small mods. I have to tell you though that you need to count in getting your ecu remapped or go aftermarket. Mine hates anything from 10psi, and runs with flat spots etc. Im leaving my boost controller off until i get my ecu remapped for that exact reason.

ok thanks helpful people, smart arses, well you know what your good for.

Im spending most of the budget on non-engine modifications which is why im keeping it simple.

BTW, what is R&R? Im guessing it aint rest and relaxation

The pod filter will be entirely useless and not help power goals at all. It will also greatly increase the "I've got a stock turbo that spools even when I am being overtaken up a hill by a corrola sound"....which is the most ghey aspect of any R33 GTST ownership experience.

If you get a good full exhaust, panel filter, R34 side mount then you will probably make more than 160rwkw, perhaps closer to 170rwkw (if it matters). If you plan on changing the turbo skip the R34 side mount step, and add a Front mount WHEN you install the larger turbo.

Nothing wrong with a nice induction sound - it keeps things lively and entertaining.

The stock airbox is wank, it is massive and taken up loads of engine bay space as well as looking like cr@p. I'm all for say an ARC airbox but f**k the OEM offering right off.:thumbsup:

As for running a side-mount with 12 psi on the stock turbo I don't think that is very good advice at all, especially in a hot country.

Only a fool would buy an R34 SMIC especially if they are gonna get a bigger turbo later.

At what stage does it hit R+R or experience knock [without an ecu or bender]???? Don't answer, I don't care, its a rhetoric question.

I went up to 12 psi on the standard ECU and it was pulling timing and the torque curve looked like a crinkle cut crisp side-on.

I had 3" 'zaust, sports cat, FMIC, POD filter.

But also a hard intake pipe and I cut the mesh off the inside of the AFM.

It made 206.5 rear wheel Kw's on a custom tune with dragging rear brakes so was obviously flowing very well with all the intake and 'zaust mods.

R and R is where the ecu sees too much flow from the afm and changes the timing and the fuel mix the keep the engine "hunky dory". Turn the boost up to about 13 or 14 psi and the stock ecu wont like it and will give you a scare . But smartarseness aside I have tried what I said earlier. The turbo didn't break and the car went like a cut snake. But still, don't try it tho...I have run 14 to 15 psi for the last few months and its fine so far. I don't flog it incessantly and don't let it get very hot from extended wot. To be safe stick with what the other guys have said..10 to 12 psi. Don't waste your time upping the boost over 10 psi till you get an aftermarket ecu tho. It will r and r and feel like crap to drive with poor economy :yes: Oh and don't cut the mesh out of your afm...It helps with air turbulence

R and R = Rich and Retard - ecu dumps more fuel in and pulls tiiming severely to protect engine - you'll know all about it - sudden loss of power and yes get a high flow panel filter for your stock air box.

What is the maximum boost that the stock turbos can handle? (or what boost level should i keep it under)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pretty sure I was answering this ^^ question when I said 12psi.

If the question was.....what is the highest boost I can run with stock ecu before R&R? or what is the maximum boost I should run with a SMIC? then somewhere lower would be advisable.

That mesh in the afm is actually there for a reason. I believe its to straighten out airflow before it reaches the resistor wire so it can take an accurate reading. I dont think its really necessary to remove it when it hasnt actually been proven to be a restriction.

Plenty of people have made alot more power with it still intact.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...