Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a list of things to do while the head is off, but keen to hear about anyone's experiences of small items which have failed for others, that might be worth replacing/checking/fixing while the head's off.

knock sensors is one im unsure of, not sure if they are worth doing.

it's an old RB20, 200,000+, seen a tonne of thrashing, a lot of overheating. some of the big obvious stuff which will obviously get done:

head gasket

water pump

timing belt

heater hoses

ideas on anything else?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/367048-things-to-do-on-a-headless-block/
Share on other sites

fark with 200 +kms just throw in another motor... average rb20 goes for around 200-400 bucks

but if you have the head off check the valve guides and check the valves for mushrooming. replace stem seals but only if the guides are ok or your wasting your time..

Well if the bottom end is/could be questionable I'd think spending money on its top end is too .

You get so much more bog std from an RB25 that if it can be done legally in your state it'd be my no 1 move .

A good std one tuned properly , std engine + manifolds that is , should eat a 20 in a road car mainly because into the larger bore they had bigger ports and valves .

Other than this a good runner RB20 would be the best bang for buck I think .

A .

fark with 200 +kms just throw in another motor... average rb20 goes for around 200-400 bucks

but if you have the head off check the valve guides and check the valves for mushrooming. replace stem seals but only if the guides are ok or your wasting your time..

engine is fine, just doing a freshen up as ive just done some work to it to push 250rwkw.

head's getting pressure tested, if there's any leaks through the valves they will be checked and seals replaced, if not ill leave them.

New exhaust manifold studs.

thanks mate, already done.

Well if the bottom end is/could be questionable I'd think spending money on its top end is too .

You get so much more bog std from an RB25 that if it can be done legally in your state it'd be my no 1 move .

A good std one tuned properly , std engine + manifolds that is , should eat a 20 in a road car mainly because into the larger bore they had bigger ports and valves .

Other than this a good runner RB20 would be the best bang for buck I think .

A .

dont wanna use a 25 mate, have one sitting a meter away from the car too, doesnt interest me. keep the comments RB20 related, i've been around skylines long enough to know what engine i wanna use lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...