Jump to content
SAU Community

R33,34 / R32 Attessa, Hicas And Torque Split


Recommended Posts

Can someone help me out with a couple of questions please?

1. Does anyone have experience with using a torque split controller such as the HKS ETC on an R32 GTR? If so can you tell me what your impressions are?

2. I understand the R33 and 34 versions of ATTESSA and HICAS differ from the R32 system, particularly with respect to ATTESSA torque split. Has anyone researched the possibility of adapting all or part of the ATTESSA or HICAS system from an R33 or 34 into an R32?

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HKS torque split controller is good for wet cond while in competition . Can set the split to keep the drive consistent and help stop the tail sliding before the front starts to bite.

Prolonged use will not do the clutch packs in the transfer case a lot of good as your running a constant slippage.

It is also a bastard to turn at slow speed unless it's in the auto position...

What differences are you expecting from the R33/R34 combo unless it is out of a VSpec which has a faster acting ATTESSA computer( but is also coupled with the hydraulic diff)

Cheers

Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken;

Thanks for the feedback on the ETC. Gotcha on the clutch packs, I take it that you wouldn't recommend using one on a daily driven car?

It's the faster acting ATTESSA I'm after. I understand the 33/34 system transfers torque to the front much sooner than the 32 system. However, from your thread I gather that this might only occur on V spec models?

Regards,

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Supposedly the R33 and/or R34 ATTESSA controller is able to be swapped into the R32?

Hi Elithrar;

Did some more research today. Seems that the actuator is electronic in the 33/34 rather than hydraulic as in the 32. A conversion would seem to be of the 'nightmare' variety and is rapidly looking to be a no-no unfortunately.

The only option seems to be the HKS ETC, which I understand is discontinued, and there appear to be very few people using them so not much user info exists.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken;

Thanks for the feedback on the ETC. Gotcha on the clutch packs, I take it that you wouldn't recommend using one on a daily driven car?

Regards,  

Mark

Mark , there is an off position which returns it to normal and I have( had ) one in my old R which I used if it look likr things were going to get *spirited* in the traction/conering department.

Only thing you have to watch is if it is set high and you turn it on, it may bring up the 4wd light which means you then have to stop the car, turn it off and bring the setting up slowly.

They work well and set with a heavy rear bias can give predictable drif.... err , fun.

Cheers

Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is also some DIY type controller that i was reading about in some online AutoSpeed article. From the author, he was apparently amazed at how much faster he could push the R (32 as well). He had quite a few different settings, i think a scale from 1 - 10. I can't remember whether 1 was super dry conditions, or 10 was.

I couldn't quite follow the theory behind the little thing he set up but i think the HKS system may have been mentioned. I'll try and find the article for ya.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok i just read it, he did change some suspension items. I was just looking at the first pic :)

anyways, i hope you could follow the explanation. It seems to be what you wanted, and it sounds awesome. If i ever get an 'R' i might have to give it a try. I very, VERY much like the idea of being able to change the settings of the torque split for wet or dry conditions. Great idea. Altho i know very, very little about how ATTESSA works or suspension for that matter.

anyways, i think the guy didn't realise that GT-R's from the factory always had had the oversteer character. I guess that's just the way Nissan wants them or makes them. Well that's what i've always heard.

hope the article helps.

cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've driven a stocker and an autospeed controller car back to back (it was on 6/10) and the difference was amazing....not bad for about $20.

Hi Duncan;

That's interesting, I always knew that someone other than Julian Edgar must've built and/or used one. The understanding I gained from reading the article is that, as you say, the difference is amazing. I'll proably go down the route of trying to build one myself as the money for the HKS unit seems way too high given the content, although it has plug n play convenience on its side.

Assuming that the car you drove wasn't Julian's own car, do you know who built the unit and if they're a SAU member?

Regards

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, I was just toying with this idea today. So the only really "upgrade" you can do for the R32 is to a V-spec R32 controller? Anything else required besides the controller itself?

I was hoping this was the case so I could just swap in an R33 or R34 controller but apparently the means of actuation on the R33/34 is electronic rather than hydraulic, so unfortunately a straight swap doesn't seem possible.

Can anyone with a 33/34 confirm this?

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, they are on the forums, try pming HAW001. The difference was hge, although I havent driven a car with the HKS controller to compare to. Cost would be under $50, or bugger all if you can follow the instructions on autospeed yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 215/45/18 tyres are probably a little on the low side compared to the factory tyre, it should be closer to a 245/45/19, which will get you about an extra 11mm of height, and should make you speedo read a bit closer to reality. 245/45/19s will be a bit too far the other way and you risk a speeding ticket as your speedo might read slower than your actual speed.  245/40/19s would be correct if you are going to 19in rims, they will give you a similar total diameter to the 245/45/18 tyres.  
    • That's something I forgot to put in my list. The aggressive anti-squat in R32 is a f**king menace. I still need to decide if I'm going to drag the subframe out of my car and weld in the GKTech corrector kit. The main reason to dither is the need to switch to spherical joints in the lower arm to account for the twist induced in the rear pivot caused by lowering the front pivot. And yes...we do put better subframes in R32s, and I wish I'd gotten an S14 one instead of an A31 when I did the "take off and nuke it from orbit" HICAS delete all those years ago.
    • I have been looking at some setting on the alarms for the Q60 and what buttons do and so and also been looking for details on the alarm in my V37 which is a standard issue with the car. settings like window roll up and a few others seem to not work at all. i cant seem to find exact info on V37 alarms so Q60 is all i can really go off i have not tried 400Z alarm settings or info yet so that will be next. any one got like a sheet of info on the alarm system in the V37 as all my documents are in japanese but i thought the system would basically be like standard through similar models? 
    • I had a fuel smell coming from the drivers rear and pulled the tank out to inspect where it was coming from, turns out the breather hose from the tank to the filler neck was perished. I’m going to Japan next week and I’ll grab it while I’m there  pulled the oil tank apart and started cleaning this crap out of it, some brake cleaner and rags got it looking new again 
    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
×
×
  • Create New...