Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im interested in buying one of those nismo, 320kph 11,000rpm clusters but im not sure whether or not it will work in my car or not. is it a straight plug and play, or do i need to rewire it. and ive

also got a series two with A-lsd, slip, ABS and hicas lights, would these still light up on them or not. even if they dont will it impede on the system or will it work perfectly fine?

any help would be great.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/371053-nismo-clusters/
Share on other sites

haha i bet. but their even dearer.lol but i still want one. unfortunatly i just bought another engine cause mines stuffed, u got any idea where the best place is to order a engine rebuild kit would be for a series 2 rb25det? and a head gasket to suit a bored 25 to 27?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/371053-nismo-clusters/#findComment-5916486
Share on other sites

It only goes upto 179km/h

No it goes much higher then that

Because the R33's have electronic speedos rather then cable driven, the speed is sensed from the gearbox output shaft and converted in to an electronic signal. I'm pretty sure that both GTS-t and GTR both have the same diff ratio, so the speed sensed from the output shaft would be transmitted as the same value to the speedo from both gearboxes.

The only thing that would make them different would be a different diff ratio. I'm pretty sure they both share the same ratio, but happy to be corrected

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/371053-nismo-clusters/#findComment-5919640
Share on other sites

really pete!!! Thats great then!!! Gotta love Nismo

Please PM me a price, im after a white faced one for R33

hey can i also get a price for that same dash? they are nice upgrade :ninja:

Edited by SliverS2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/371053-nismo-clusters/#findComment-5919681
Share on other sites

No it goes much higher then that

Because the R33's have electronic speedos rather then cable driven, the speed is sensed from the gearbox output shaft and converted in to an electronic signal. I'm pretty sure that both GTS-t and GTR both have the same diff ratio, so the speed sensed from the output shaft would be transmitted as the same value to the speedo from both gearboxes.

The only thing that would make them different would be a different diff ratio. I'm pretty sure they both share the same ratio, but happy to be corrected

I could only ever get mine to go upto 179kp/h on my R32 :/

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/371053-nismo-clusters/#findComment-5920637
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

all stock japans cars have limiters built in by the computer this is what they call the genltemens agreement. the R35 GTR has a sat navi so that if your on a race track it unlocks the full power of the GTR.

I could only ever get mine to go upto 179kp/h on my R32 :/

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/371053-nismo-clusters/#findComment-5988302
Share on other sites

They mean the actual number represented on the Power FC hand controller. Every one knows that Jap cars are speed limited to 180km/h. It had nothing to do with a "gentlemans agreement", it was simply that you only needed to build the car to be able to go to a maximum of 180km/h safely. The "gentlemens agreement" was referred to manufacturers in the 90's limiting power output to 206kw (even though they didn't).

And the R35 GTR doesn't unlock the full power when you go on a race track, it simply removes the speed limiter.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/371053-nismo-clusters/#findComment-5988392
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...