Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry for the blond questions I understand that a nistune is a mod done to the ecu but Im still getting the jist of this stuff as I am an old school carby and distributer nollage so I'm getting the drift of this ecu and afm and stuff Cheers

Sorry for the blond questions I understand that a nistune is a mod done to the ecu but Im still getting the jist of this stuff as I am an old school carby and distributer nollage so I'm getting the drift of this ecu and afm and stuff Cheers

All good, best way to learn is to ask. So does it all make sense now? rb20det, r32 rb26det and r34 rb25det ecu's are the only skyline ECUs that can be nistuned.

Im thinking about going auto in my 33, just wondering if a modified Z32 ecu running nistune will run the auto the same as an r33 ecu would in regards to timing changes on shifts?

we have done it but its not controlling the auto correctly, the separate auto ecus are wired different

  • 2 months later...

Great thread.

I'm trying to gather information to help me decide on the best route to take with my car. A reputable shop in Brisbane is suggesting I go the powerfc over a nistune for my basic mods (pod, fmic, exhaust). Reliability and bang for buck are what I am most concerned with, just want something that is RELIABLE and will leverage the mods I have (would be happy with anything up to 200rwkw).

I was a little confused by what this shop suggested as from what I have read, Nistune sounds like the best option for me??

Both will do what you are asking with no issue, sounds like the shop prefers to tune the power FC and that is why they are recommending it. I would go nistune personally purely because it is cheaper and it looks stock/will pass a defect inspection.

Edited by Rolls

I would put money on they tune power fc's more than nistune and they know their way around it better.

At the end of the day it's your decision and you do what you like with your money. IMO they are both as good as each other and nistune would probally be the cheaper option. I went with the power fc because i found a cheap one and jumped on it, some people love them and some people hate them It's your choice do as you wish.

Ok, so would I be correct in saying they are both capable of achieving the power/results I want and both will provide the same level of reliability? Seems like the only thing splitting them is cost? I would also assume the PowerFC would be more capable when moving onto stage 2/3 tuning and into bigger power figures (which I am not planning on)

Maybe I just need tochat to some other local shops that aren't averse to nistuning. Would the average tuning shop handle both, or do they usually specialise in a particular make?

Both will be fine. Some tuning shops may never have seen a Nistune and may be hesitant. If you can't find a good tuner for the Nistune look for a cheap PFC but Nistune should work out cheaper.

Ok, so would I be correct in saying they are both capable of achieving the power/results I want and both will provide the same level of reliability? Seems like the only thing splitting them is cost? I would also assume the PowerFC would be more capable when moving onto stage 2/3 tuning and into bigger power figures (which I am not planning on)

Maybe I just need tochat to some other local shops that aren't averse to nistuning. Would the average tuning shop handle both, or do they usually specialise in a particular make?

What is 'stage 2/3 tuning'? Play less Need For Speed man :P

The ECU doesn't make the power, fuel+air+spark makes power. And that is all in the tune. A PowerFC is going to be no more capable or reliable than a NIStune unless the tuner is more capable with the PowerFC, etc. There's cars around making over 600kw with NIStuned ECU's.

Edited by Hanaldo

Lol @ stage 2 tuning

Seriously though a good tuner should be able to tune anything you give him, if they are iffy about nistune OR powerFC I would find another tuner for that reason. They are both incredibly common in the skyline scene so any tuner who does these sorts of cars regularly should have bucket loads of experience with both ECUs.

If you don't think a group of recommended mods done in a particular sequence can be classified as different stages, fair enough. I only know what I have read, so my bad if i'm using terminology that isn't cool.

I think i'll shop around for a good tuner

People just tend to laugh when you say stage 2 or stage 3, because what the hell is stage 3, is it adding a bigger turbo, is it changing your fuel latency value? is it a combination of exhaust housing and injector swap?

It is completely arbitrary so it just sounds a bit silly.

I would get a Nistune and only go for proper standalone ecu (haltechs, motec) if you need to upgrade

Correct me if im wrong but i understand the PFC doesn't retard timing if it detects a knock, just flashes engine check light on your dash

I know you should backout if you see the check light but I would like a little insurance from the ecu if it does happen...

That's my 2 cents

Correct me if im wrong but i understand the PFC doesn't retard timing if it detects a knock, just flashes engine check light on your dash

I know you should backout if you see the check light but I would like a little insurance from the ecu if it does happen...

True on the Power FC. Also true on Nistune if you have made the knock maps the same as the main maps, which is necessary one a lot of cars when they suffer from phantom knock (ie the ECU thinks there's knock when there isn't and switches to the soft maps). I had to do this on my R32 RB20DET for that reason. It has run for years like that and I've never heard a tinkle from the engine bay.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...