Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone i didn't know if i should post this in the turbo upgrade sticky, but i didn't upgrade my turbos. so i decided to add it here.

i have attached 2 dyno graphs one with standard AFM and one with Z32 AFM. i did this so new people can see how much power they can get for this modification. But remember this is how much i gained on my car, every car is different depending on mods/age/worn engine ect.... But in my instance i gained 17rwkw from adding Z32AFM to my car. Hope this helps you in deciding what mods you wanna do to your car in the future :thumbsup:.

post-43204-0-55158000-1314581997_thumb.jpg

post-43204-0-31284500-1314582013_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/
Share on other sites

Isn't this just standard AFM pushed to max then putting a better AFM on with a larger scope and tuning to suit and getting more power

I don't think if you had for example 190rwkw you would necessarily gain power just by adding a Z32 AFM

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5989764
Share on other sites

You should find that the z32 air flow meters will give you a larger tuning resolution that the stock ones,

but there really is no way that the Z32 AFM's can give you a power increase on their own.

The stock AFM's will run out of resolution/max out and have no more Voltage range to give at approx 300rwkw, i have had this exactly on my own car, then the Z32's are installed to give tuning resolution past this mark.

The power gain you have shown is most likely because of a diferent day on the dyno, some other modification you performed, or most likely it is running a bit leaner on boost or have more ignition timing.

Not having a go at you, just letting you and others know, that AFM's, just like upgrading fuel pumps and injectors will not give any power increase, but they will support more power.

The only other way a pair of Z32's will give more power on their own would be if the stock 65mm AFM size was restricting the motor and the 80mm size allowed the engine to breath better. The Nismo AFM's are 65mm though, with the tuning resolution of the Z32 AFM, so really, unless we are looking at 550+rwkw, i cant see that being the case :thumbsup:.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5989781
Share on other sites

Yeah Z32 won't give you more power.

Any extra power would come from tune adjustments, boost, dyno variance etc.

Could even be the old AFM's were on the way out for instance. Or you had a minor leak, so replacing/refitting piping removed that etc. Plenty of reasons why there is more power - the AFM's though ain't one of them.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5989816
Share on other sites

Hence i'm showing that having Z32AFM would give you more potential to make more power over stock items, off course to make the extra power you would need a proper dyno tune and other mods (that's why i added the mods done listed on 1st graph).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990155
Share on other sites

No you said: "how much power people can get from this modification".

That is distinctly different to "give you more potential to make more power ".

The AFM swap did not give you power. Something else did.

It's common knowledge a Z32 or Nismo AFM will 'read' more air than a stock AFM.

Either way @ 250rwkw, your stock AFMs were not maxed out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990177
Share on other sites

Hello everyone i didn't know if i should post this in the turbo upgrade sticky, but i didn't upgrade my turbos. so i decided to add it here.

i have attached 2 dyno graphs one with standard AFM and one with Z32 AFM. i did this so new people can see how much power they can get for this modification. But remember this is how much i gained on my car, every car is different depending on mods/age/worn engine ect.... But in my instance i gained 17rwkw from adding Z32AFM to my car. Hope this helps you in deciding what mods you wanna do to your car in the future :thumbsup:.

Just that part there may have been a poor choice of words. I get what your saying

But the way you put it just sounds like you mean "Put a Z32 AFM on and you'll get more power"

Question but for the more experienced users on here:

Say for a 150rwkw Skyline with a Power FC, just as an example - Would having a standard AFM be better then a Z32 as the resoloution isnt spread out so much? Or am I completely misunderstanding the idea behind this

The way I see it, if you have a 20x20 map on a stock AFM thats good for 150kw (I'm just using a random figure), then you have a 20x20 map with a Z32 AFM map thats good for 300kw (again hypothetical figure). You've got so many more cells to tune the amount of airflow for 150kw as its using all the cells rather then just half on the Z32.

This is just a question, as I've thought about this for a while and this is how I see it, I know that the Power FC intorpolates the 'in between' data, but still would be interesting to know if my assumption is right

Also thought the same applied for injectors? Get stupidly large injectors and you'll have plenty of room to breathe, but lose a bit of the fine tuning

Or am I completly wrong :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990184
Share on other sites

Hence i'm showing that having Z32AFM would give you more potential to make more power over stock items, off course to make the extra power you would need a proper dyno tune and other mods (that's why i added the mods done listed on 1st graph).

Well... Yeh, obviously lol.

This is like saying you had maxed your stock injectors at 200rwkw so you upgraded your injectors and now make 300rwkw, therefore the injectors gave you an additional 100rwkw. In reality it didn't, it was the other things you modified that gave you the power increase.

I'm not sure what you were trying to show by posting this? I mean is that not the exact reason everyone upgrades their AFM, because they have maxed their stock item?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990185
Share on other sites

Question but for the more experienced users on here:

Say for a 150rwkw Skyline with a Power FC, just as an example - Would having a standard AFM be better then a Z32 as the resoloution isnt spread out so much? Or am I completely misunderstanding the idea behind this

The way I see it, if you have a 20x20 map on a stock AFM thats good for 150kw (I'm just using a random figure), then you have a 20x20 map with a Z32 AFM map thats good for 300kw (again hypothetical figure). You've got so many more cells to tune the amount of airflow for 150kw as its using all the cells rather then just half on the Z32.

This is just a question, as I've thought about this for a while and this is how I see it, I know that the Power FC intorpolates the 'in between' data, but still would be interesting to know if my assumption is right

Also thought the same applied for injectors? Get stupidly large injectors and you'll have plenty of room to breathe, but lose a bit of the fine tuning

Or am I completly wrong :thumbsup:

if you set up the power fc to suit yes you would have more accuracy with a standard afm, but you'd be lucky to notice any difference. the afm voltage and power fc load points arent linear either, its exponential. for example, on the power fc base map for a rb25 the last load point (p20) is double p15 and nearly 4 times p10. its set up this way to give more accurate tuning under light load. also you can adjust the load points to suit but the base settings (which almost everyone uses until they max them) arent scaled to suit the standard afm, they suit up to and over 300rwkw without any resolution problems.

as for injectors the only reason you lose fine tuning is if the injectors cant atomize properly at idle and low load or if the ecu/injector drivers arent capable of opening them for short periods with enough accuracy. with a good ecu and decent injectors (id2000s for example) you can have the car idling at the same AFR's and with the same quality as standard injectors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990413
Share on other sites

No you said: "how much power people can get from this modification".

That is distinctly different to "give you more potential to make more power ".

The AFM swap did not give you power. Something else did.

It's common knowledge a Z32 or Nismo AFM will 'read' more air than a stock AFM.

Either way @ 250rwkw, your stock AFMs were not maxed out.

what about if it were a r33 gtst, would the z32 be better than a stock afm, at what power output would the z32 be best to use?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990442
Share on other sites

what about if it were a r33 gtst, would the z32 be better than a stock afm, at what power output would the z32 be best to use?

no, the Z32 AFM is not better than the stock GTST afm. Both are 3 or 4 wire, hotwire Air flow meters that are 80mm in size.

The Z32 AFM allows for a wider tuning scale but it does zero to add more rwkw or average power etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990570
Share on other sites

no, the Z32 AFM is not better than the stock GTST afm. Both are 3 or 4 wire, hotwire Air flow meters that are 80mm in size.

The Z32 AFM allows for a wider tuning scale but it does zero to add more rwkw or average power etc.

so say for example, i was at a power level between say 200 and 250kw, would using the z32 give the dyno graph a fatter curve or /more accurate or steeper curve than the standard?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375532-dyno-tune/#findComment-5990587
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...