Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

One of my GTS-T's came with an old worn set of keys so I took the key to a local locksmith who put the key in a machine to measure it and create the code number for it. They then cut a key to the code and gave it to me to check in the car locks.

When I confirmed that it worked perfectly they gave me a printout of the code so that I can have keys cut from the code instead of an existing key in the future - this way you get a perfect key every time.

The only problem is finding a local locksmith that has the equipment to cut a key from the code and most of the small key cutting services can only copy a key from one that you provide.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378299-r32-key-code/#findComment-6033529
Share on other sites

The code is also on the drivers door lock. Know this because my key snap in the lock 2 weeks ago so I bought the lock to the locksmith and he cut a new key from the code. Cost me $25, but he charged me another $15 to take the lock apart to get the snapped key out and clean the lock. He also told me the spray CRC in all my locks because it looked like my car had been underwater. Haha. The locks are like new now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378299-r32-key-code/#findComment-6034156
Share on other sites

The code is also on the drivers door lock. Know this because my key snap in the lock 2 weeks ago so I bought the lock to the locksmith and he cut a new key from the code. Cost me $25, but he charged me another $15 to take the lock apart to get the snapped key out and clean the lock. He also told me the spray CRC in all my locks because it looked like my car had been underwater. Haha. The locks are like new now.

yeah i knew there was a lock somewhere in the car that said it, but couldn't remember. the people i bought my old business off also had a locksmith so i went there to get a key cut when i had my 33 and the keys i had were a bit worn and they said i could just get the code off one of the locks and then they could cut me a new key.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378299-r32-key-code/#findComment-6034524
Share on other sites

I could open my car by putting the other half of the broken key in the door lock so all I had to do was remove the door trim, remove 1 screw holding the lock and the metal rod that unclips. This was on my R33, but should be the same on the R32. I hope your car is unlocked.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378299-r32-key-code/#findComment-6036942
Share on other sites

sounds like your local nissan dealer is clueless. . . .if you give him the chassis number then he can use that to give you the key code, very useful when you dont have the original key like i did when i bought a 31 without any keys whatsover

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378299-r32-key-code/#findComment-6037068
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...