Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As discussed you'd need to be big to pull it off, and because I'm built like a bitch a no no for me :P

Just had rare as f**k steak cbf waiting for it to cook more

rare on this scale tasted good though

cook-a-steak-blue-rare-medium-welldone.jpg

lol well done - waste of a good qaulity steak..

fixed my dash made a custom surround with scott..

So now you'll be attending meets?

Bitch...

P.S. paint it black Aaron.

yeh ill be at garage cafe soon. wait for me yeh?

i was driving to scotts house holding the dash lol

Yo how come my Rode NT3 needs less trim than my Shure Beta 87A...both on phantom power...

different mic's dude. lol

the nt3 is a condenser mic it'll be less sensetive and need less trim than the 87A. plus phantom power is shite lol.. when you turn it on though does it buzz?

we use condensers for high hats or border line snare. plus guitars brass etc for when there isnt a DI or an acoustic is being used without a DI

No buzz from phantom power, sounds really good actually! 87A is incredible, doesn't even sound like a mic...just sounds like someone's voice coming straight through the speaker. And that's using my guitar amp as a monitor lol.

well it means that the mixer is earthed really well then so thats good.

yeh 87a is a great mic. you should invest in either foldbacks or some studio monitors.. did you end up getting them? cant be mixing through comp speakers lol play the track on your theatre system and itll sound aids.

lol reverb level: karaoke. Gotta work out how to put on reverb first; this mixer has so much shit to learn.

Will be getting monitors when tax return arrives. What did you recommend again?

it has in built effects in the mixer doesnt it?

i cant remember what mark thought, but i was thinking Behringer B3031A

DUDE, if you can get your hands on a set of yamaha ns10 studio monitors, that what we use. its also what tupac used and 808 studios currently use still.

but they are exxy

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/YAMAHA-NS10M-STUDIO-MONITORS-/150879125911?pt=AU_hifi_system&hash=item232118c197#ht_500wt_1203

they arent powered either so you need another amp

it has in built effects in the mixer doesnt it?

i cant remember what mark thought, but i was thinking Behringer B3031A

DUDE, if you can get your hands on a set of yamaha ns10 studio monitors, that what we use. its also what tupac used and 808 studios currently use still.

but they are exxy

http://www.ebay.com....7#ht_500wt_1203

they arent powered either so you need another amp

LOL @ ns10's in 2012

they were good (and industry standard) like 20 years ago man...

there is a lot better out there these days.

if you want a reccomendation give me a price range and i'll ask my brother (he was the audio project manager for the olympic opening/closing ceremony)

Dude ns10's are still one of the top studio monitors, if they are powered with a correct amp.

Live is very much different to studio work.

Yes i work in audio, and we have quite a succesful company in live & studio work. Birds can confirm this.

We use ns10m and im pretty sure if out mixes came out shit we wouldnt be where we are.

Anyone who says ns10m are outdated and shit, cannot mix for shit. And thats why they believe they sound like shit

Dude ns10's are still one of the top studio monitors, if they are powered with a correct amp.

Live is very much different to studio work.

Yes i work in audio, and we have quite a succesful company in live & studio work. Birds can confirm this.

We use ns10m and im pretty sure if out mixes came out shit we wouldnt be where we are

lol i realise studio and live are different... i'm sure andrew didn't fill the stadium with 11ty billion reference monitors ;)

that's only 1 area of his job lol - poor kid gets worked to the BONE for like $75k (problem is he loves it)

Remember I was a dj/nightclub promoer and involved in studio production for a decade and have toured pretty much every major dance music producer (well the pre 05ish ones anyway) and eveyone has been phazing out ns10's since the early 2000's. we had 2 sets in our studio, and moved 1 set into the loungeroom. there is still 1 set in the studio that gets used for production, but not the final mixdown

ns10's are good reference monitors for production no doubt, but the reason for them being where they were in the industry was moreso that they dont have the best sound, and if your music sounds good on ns10's then it will sound good on anything.

if you want reference monitors for listening, then there are better options is what i'm saying.

you should hear these new ones that andrew bought man.... somewhere in ther region of 5k... they sound amazing

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...