Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/mother-of-two-calls-out-treasurer-joe-hockey-with-an-open-letter-doing-the-maths-on-sydney-housing-affordability-2015-6

Poor woman had to borrow money from her family to buy her first house...shock horror

Uses as an example the most expensive housing market in the country weighed against the average nationwide wage for a single university graduate

#leftylogic

Why do people think being able to easily buy an inner city property as a single person with any old job is a god given right? And when did this mentality begin? I can't remember my parents wanting to live in Toorak on average wage - they bought on the fringe with decent jobs, which 35 years later happens to be a very good area...now!

Saw a few people share that on fb.. Unfriended them ain't got time for flogs like that waving a victim card.

Your spot on birds my parents did it tough in a not glamorous suburb no flash car no dinners out heck my dad was the plumber, painter, mechanic, Gardner you name it cos wasn't money left over after takin care of the family.

I still find the whole affordability thing a joke since so many people are buying while the others sit around at a likely expensive hipster dinner sipping wine and fine beers bemoaning how unfair it all is

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/mother-of-two-calls-out-treasurer-joe-hockey-with-an-open-letter-doing-the-maths-on-sydney-housing-affordability-2015-6

Poor woman had to borrow money from her family to buy her first house...shock horror

Uses as an example the most expensive housing market in the country weighed against the average nationwide wage for a single university graduate

#leftylogic

Why do people think being able to easily buy an inner city property as a single person with any old job is a god given right? And when did this mentality begin? I can't remember my parents wanting to live in Toorak on average wage - they bought on the fringe with decent jobs, which 35 years later happens to be a very good area...now!

I'm not sure I follow the conservative logic here.

It is undeniable that housing is becoming a serious issue.

The 30% of income dedicated to living expenditure has been breached for some time now and cost of living is also increasing. Housing prices continue to rise exponentially and interest rates are set to rise again at some point. It's going to be a clusterf**k when it happens.

Y'all conservatives just need to stop getting all butthurt and crying because the libs are being attacked and take a step back. It's not the LNP's fault there is an issue, and no one is actually saying that. There has been an issue for a long time and it's a bipartisan problem.

The only reason the LNP are being attacked is (again) the treasurer said something stupid that alienated a huge portion of the population that are affected by this issue.

This an attack not on a party but a well deserving individual with a history of similar comments.

If Labor were in power the libs would be attacking them on the exact same issues (as they did just a couple of years ago) because they know it's a real issue and makes the incumbent government an easy target.

Labor did nothing much last time and if elected again will probably do nothing as abolishing negative gearing is akin to political suicide.

Saw a few people share that on fb.. Unfriended them ain't got time for flogs like that waving a victim card.

Your spot on birds my parents did it tough in a not glamorous suburb no flash car no dinners out heck my dad was the plumber, painter, mechanic, Gardner you name it cos wasn't money left over after takin care of the family.

I still find the whole affordability thing a joke since so many people are buying while the others sit around at a likely expensive hipster dinner sipping wine and fine beers bemoaning how unfair it all is

Also I don't think she was suggesting that someone on average wage should be buying a $900k house, merely using an example to highlight her point.

This is just a measure to show the state of the market.

To be fair though the numbers don't support as wide spread an issue I think the whingers make more noise.

ie 25% of home owners are mortgage free.. If the 'average' loan is $440k on a median of 660k they're +200k equity so a cluster fk would seem unlikely perhaps extended stagnation sure & probably a good thing, but hard to foresee much more

Let's not forget the market did change quickly in gfc period but it's only a loss if you have to sell. Employment is a bigger issue than houses prices IMO.

http://mobile.news.com.au/finance/money/home-loan-customers-are-optimising-low-interest-rates-to-cut-their-mortgage-debts-faster/story-e6frfmdr-1227186099314

Edited by alr33x

So it's a bipartisan problem, and the best thing any of the numbskulls can think of is punitive tax reform which won't get up. Ergo we're all stuffed, and just need to hold out until the boomers drop off. Problem solved.

I also don't get the obsession with ownership. Flogs will cry about renting and "paying some investor's mortgage" but apparently cannot join the dots and see that mortgage interest payments will flow to the bank's shareholders. With prices as they are in a lot of areas, it doesn't make sense to buy

To be fair though the numbers don't support as wide spread an issue I think the whingers make more noise.

ie 25% of home owners are mortgage free.. If the 'average' loan is $440k on a median of 660k they're +200k equity so a cluster fk would seem unlikely perhaps extended stagnation sure & probably a good thing, but hard to foresee much more

Let's not forget the market did change quickly in gfc period but it's only a loss if you have to sell. Employment is a bigger issue than houses prices IMO.

Yeah, but who make up that 25%?

Mostly people that bought a long time ago lol.

I also massively agree with equity only being an issue if you have to sell, hence that 25% being mostly o/o are safe as houses (pun intended)

The clusterf**k i was referring to was not regarding existing mortgage free o/o but people trying to get into the market and people who are borrowed to the max due to current prices on 4.5%

Shit is going to go downhill real fast there lol

Yeah no doubt people who have gone to the hill cos rates are low are precariously placed but those type of people would do the same thing even if houses were 300k and 7% it's either the only way they can get in or they just don't care.

Yeah no doubt people who have gone to the hill cos rates are low are precariously placed but those type of people would do the same thing even if houses were 300k and 7% it's either the only way they can get in or they just don't care.

To a point... higher prices precipitate lending beyond means. When it is 7% again thise people are gonna be left behind

Yeah don't get me started on sooky tenants when an owner decides to sell expectin compensation and can't do this can't do that.. No actually I can and I will go fk yourself don't like it don't rent

That sucks but it's part of #rentallyf

Yes and no there's always those aspirational folks who'll reach beyond safe means. The banking system is to easy to manipulate for loans too, again separate issue of course

Yes and no... we lend on economist predicted affordability rates only.

Not the ability to pay actual rates.

Asset lenders are another kettle of fish though

So it's a bipartisan problem, and the best thing any of the numbskulls can think of is punitive tax reform which won't get up. Ergo we're all stuffed, and just need to hold out until the boomers drop off. Problem solved.

I also don't get the obsession with ownership. Flogs will cry about renting and "paying some investor's mortgage" but apparently cannot join the dots and see that mortgage interest payments will flow to the bank's shareholders. With prices as they are in a lot of areas, it doesn't make sense to buy

First point is spot on...

Second point fails a bit regarding those that can't afford to buy due to the market but also can not save enough to avoid the pension.

You can't rent on the pension so the only solution there is going to be a massive drain on the economy

I'm not sure I follow the conservative logic here.

It is undeniable that housing is becoming a serious issue.

The 30% of income dedicated to living expenditure has been breached for some time now and cost of living is also increasing. Housing prices continue to rise exponentially and interest rates are set to rise again at some point. It's going to be a clusterf**k when it happens.

Y'all conservatives just need to stop getting all butthurt and crying because the libs are being attacked and take a step back. It's not the LNP's fault there is an issue, and no one is actually saying that. There has been an issue for a long time and it's a bipartisan problem.

The only reason the LNP are being attacked is (again) the treasurer said something stupid that alienated a huge portion of the population that are affected by this issue.

This an attack not on a party but a well deserving individual with a history of similar comments.

If Labor were in power the libs would be attacking them on the exact same issues (as they did just a couple of years ago) because they know it's a real issue and makes the incumbent government an easy target.

Labor did nothing much last time and if elected again will probably do nothing as abolishing negative gearing is akin to political suicide.

I'm not really upset about Hockey getting attacked even though I think that was blown out of proportion and taken way out of context. I do believe housing affordability is an issue that should be addressed and yes worse than it was years ago, BUT not as bad as people are making it out to be when so many with average jobs are capable of doing it - Alex would see a lot of this and living in a fringe suburb myself I see a lot of it too in my neighbours.

What really rustles my jimmies here is the entitlement Marxist crowd who want to work a graduate job in the city and don't want to travel more than 15 minutes to get to it or want stone throw access to swanky bars in the inner suburbs. I think it's all a part of that internet generation who want the best of everything now and don't want to wait or better themselves to achieve it.

Labor are probably the only ones who can get away with pulling back negative gearing...LNP would lose the most votes doing that...but then again it seems to be the union backed tradies with investment properties these days; my landlord included.

Also I don't think she was suggesting that someone on average wage should be buying a $900k house, merely using an example to highlight her point.

This is just a measure to show the state of the market.

Shitty example then. I have a feeling she used that because a reasonable house in a reasonable area with a reasonable wage comparison wouldn't have given her argument much spine at all.

My 2 bedroom apartment in Boronia changed hands for $375k less than 2 years ago. It's a fantastic apartment with 3 bathrooms and 2 underground car spaces and plenty of space as a couple, let alone a single person.

Now not everyone wants to live in Boronia, but welcome to capitalism. It's not so bad - logistically it's 35 minutes from the city, 40 minutes from the beach, 5 minutes from the swanky hipster-ridden mountain cafés, 20 minutes from melbourne's most expensive suburbs and 15 minutes from a plethora of corporate jobs in suburbia. That's called living within your means and still enjoying life.

At 375k - let's call it 420k now (blaze it fgt) - even a conservative 50k wage working as a receptionist with 30% living expenses; a well budgeted individual would have it paid off in 15 years or less...this is assuming you don't earn a promotion or get a better paying job, and that you don't board out the second room or end up with a partner who can co-contribute for a massive dent on the principal and loan term. That is a real world example and something the dumb bitch who wrote that letter wouldn't understand - no wonder she's working in HR, HR managers are f**king useless cunts and in the words of Joe Hockey she needs to get a better job.

First point is spot on...

Second point fails a bit regarding those that can't afford to buy due to the market but also can not save enough to avoid the pension.

You can't rent on the pension so the only solution there is going to be a massive drain on the economy

Lol, so lifelong renters can't save / invest enough to support themselves in retirement, therefore it's MY analysis that fails? Pls

Lol, so lifelong renters can't save / invest enough to support themselves in retirement, therefore it's MY analysis that fails? Pls

Not on minimum wage... and some people just aren't ever going to earn more than that. A mil is the current aim for retirement super to be comfortable without rent... on minimum wage that is not going to happen and THEN there is rent.

Get on your financial soap box all you want but the fact remains that these people do exist and will be a drain on our economy.

Try working for minimum wage / pay rent / live... it's doable... trust me, I've done it, but there is nothing left to save.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually everyone on the roads was really well behaved. The only person that did any minor tailgating was a local hoon in a Turbo Focus. Unfortunately we weren't going the same way so there was no grand initial D touge battle. Lots of people pulled over and let me through. The amount of "Hey man nice car, omg skyline, nice 34 man woo" was suprising. Like really suprising. Like almost annoying. My partner was obviously surprised, she'd never seen anyone in the real world point out the car/like the car/want to chat about the car before, so to have like 3 people per day mention it was notable, I could finally say SEE? SOMEONE THINKS THEY'RE COOL. Everyone was also pretty suprised about the weather. Every day was dry and about ~13-14C. Mount Wellington had a sign that said they close the gates at 9pm and I was heading up there at about ~7:30. It was VERY apparent that conditions were getting significantly worse by the minute on the way up and down. The road on the mountain was terrible though, it's no driving road. I have various suspension related questions now. Luckily it was only about 20 minutes from where we were staying to the top of the mountain as said Google maps. We only had the 2 nights in Hobart. We went to the Farm Gate Market though which was really good - And went down to the Hastings Thermal springs/caves down there during the day. I'd definitely be up for going back again, so luckily there's a few more sights yet to see. Didn't get to do the west coast/queenstown/cradle mountain so this was supposed to be a 'scouting' trip anyway of sorts if I were to one day do/take part in/organize a more car-focused trip. As for the boat, it wasn't bad. Well it was bad, but not in the way you're thinking. We did the night trip which leaves at 6:45 (though you have to be there ~2 hours earlier) and arrives the next morning at about 6am. There is nothing to do on the ship. If you plan accordingly and bring a book/tablet/show to watch/charger you can just chill out, take some Travacalm and just sleep through it. The food there is an extremely basic buffet that costs $32 a plate, or $14 for a $3 pizza. The way back we had a travel kettle and a few different types of cup noodles and made our own tea/coffee in the room. This was a far superior way to do it. At the very least book one of the rooms with beds. I guess as we were in the off season we didn't have room mates. You get an option for rooms with 4 beds (2x bunks) or a room with just the two bottom beds. There's also some option for a deluxe queen bed but it's much pricer. We've been on sleeper trains in Asia before so we figured this is similar (and it was)
    • You just gotta be really, really, really clear and decisive with what you want your end product to be. 99% of people who want this conversion aren't "I want to run a 295 front tyre!" so they don't really need the widebody. They just want the OEM body to look a little less dumpy, so bonnet, bar, skirts job done with some camber, stretch, slam. It's when you want that, but then decide to pivot later you get big problems. See also if you're willing to get an all in one fibreglass bar, and you're willing to accept fibreglass problems like cracking the entire item on a driveway, instead of just a piece attached to the bottom, etc etc etc. Decide this all before buyin'.
    • After @Kinkstaah debacle, I'd never want to try and get it right 😛
    • The hood lines up with the fenders. The front bar doesn't perfectly line up with the fenders where the wheel arch is. You have to 'squeeze' the front bar 'in' as it wants to naturally flare out and be longer on the sides. There's a few threads where people notice this when they only swap a GTR style bumper and front bar. Unless you have genuine OEM items - you may be better served getting conversion kits. There are GTT bumpers to fit GTR hoods. There are GTR hoods (non genuine) to fit the GTT bracketry. MAY  
×
×
  • Create New...