Jump to content
SAU Community

Skyline Vs ?


Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I have to do an example prototype of a graph for this client.

and basically in this prototype, I want to compare 4 cars..

at the moment im comparing the

R32 - gts, gts-t, gtr

r33 - gts, gts-t, gtr

i need another make of car that has 3 types to compare to

anyone know of a car?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok the soarer sounds aight

what are its equivelants

Soarer, or Supra? If Supra:

SZ = GTS (ie. non turbo 3L I6)

RZ = GT-R (ie. TT 3L I6)

GZ = ??? As far as I can work out the GZ is an RZ with leather, an auto tranny, and may only have come in aero top.

Edit: Looks like GZ also came without aerotop... and had a torsen LSD standard (wasn't standard for RZ Auto's).

LW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was coppin some smack mouth from some guys with 'fully sik v8 maaate' tellin me a stock VX SS will smash a GTS-T

I think not ... anyone care to agree / disagree?

Take him on and find out for us. :)

I would hazard a guess that a stock vx ss would beat a stock gtst but I could be wrong. :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hahaha, i got worse. Someone tried to tell me that an XR-6 with ONLY a racing chip can do 9.9 second quarter miles... no point arguing with 'em. Anyways, wasn't there also a twin turbo Soarer?

Hrmm.. could it be the XR-6T ?

The XR6 turbo sedan has no speed limiter standard :rofl: Dammit...

Thought soarer comes in N/A (tho I have not/dont remember ever seeing one), a twin turbo six and a V8. Have never seen a single turbo six unless it is a twin to single conversion. :)

Also with the supras there is also these limited edition ones that has turbo A factory upgrade, its got quiet a few extra factory TRD (?) parts fitted not sure if its still called either RZ, GZ or something else. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude.. a VX SS will smash a GTS-t R33 S1orS2. even with exhaust.. then put a exhaust on a SS.. and even with some extra boost. the GTS-t will not beat it .. sorry to say. i am a skyline enthousiest but this time your wrong :ufo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...