Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

handheld pano while hanging out in a tree today. love this place, only a few minutes ride up the bikeway.

20111120-134756_P.thumb.JPG

(click to zoom)

love the pelicans

20111120-135627_P.thumb.JPG

(click to zoom)

and, while i was on the top of this...

307806_2355986532182_1025781561_32109289_1078273624_n.jpg

i took this...

20111120-142829_P.thumb.JPG

:P (click to zoom)

EDIT: Also love those shots Micheal

Edited by Jay019

Michael shots look great - some CC maybe set the white and blacks in either photoshop or lightroom to give the image the full tonal range. The images look great just lack that little extra punch!!! Only being super critical anyway

Valencia Spain

6339877788_76a8c74c03_z.jpg

DSC_4858_59_60 by joshua.matthew.fitt, on Flickr

Prague Castle

6339018517_344838e3b5_z.jpg

DSC_0128 by joshua.matthew.fitt, on Flickr

love that first one Josh!

but any reason you used auto white balance in the bottom pic? would look awesome if wb was set properly (and horizon was 1/3 or 2/3 instead of in the middle)

Edited by Jay019

love that first one Josh!

but any reason you used auto white balance in the bottom pic? would look awesome if wb was set properly (and horizon was 1/3 or 2/3 instead of in the middle)

to tell the truth i have no idea about how to set the white balance correctly for a shot like that let alone at all. The castle shot was really hard as the lighting was from so many different sources and so many different colour temperatures :( Want to teach me haha

with night scenes tungsten seems to work best i found. on the D90 the white balance button is on the back (3rd from the top on the left, labelled WB/?/Key) just press it and give each setting a try. you'll eventually get a feel for which one works best in which light. i remember on the d90 you can set the white balance as a K value, that helps really dial it in, just give a few different settings a try. ken rockwell gives a good rundown on white balance. all i know about it is the camera tends to need a hand in artificial light. http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/whitebalance.htm

EDIT: Nice Rhys, some sweet shutter dragging going on!

Edited by Jay019

Michael shots look great - some CC maybe set the white and blacks in either photoshop or lightroom to give the image the full tonal range. The images look great just lack that little extra punch!!! Only being super critical anyway

Valencia Spain

6339877788_76a8c74c03_z.jpg

DSC_4858_59_60 by joshua.matthew.fitt, on Flickr

Prague Castle

6339018517_344838e3b5_z.jpg

DSC_0128 by joshua.matthew.fitt, on Flickr

these shots=awesome

love the bottom one....

Some randoms from recent shoots:

So the girls wouldn't let the groom into the gurdwara unless he payed up. So after a few minutes of haggling a price (which the girls declined) he decided to get his credit card out. Priceless moment!!

IMG_0809_resize.jpg

IMG_0845_resize.jpg

Sidd-Rishi-Photography-Resized-231.jpg

Sidd-Rishi-Photography-Resized-234.jpg

Experimental shot using some strobes at the getting ready shots.

13a_resize.jpg

Trying a square crop:

IMG_5363_resize.jpg

IMG_2457_resize.jpg

Had a huge success from my first photobooth session :) Cant wait to do another one. Even a 3m wide roll wasnt wide enough for big group shots.

Will post up more soon. But the shot below is just showing my setup.

_MG_9595_resize.jpg

One of my corals:

IMG_9208.jpg

Edited by siddr20

i grabbed a couple shots of the sky yesterday too. was awesome. i reckon we might get another one today. I remember it happend last year about the same time and happened for 2 or 3 days in a row.

love the variety and quality of this thread!

went for another ride to the onka river. looks like it will be a daily thing for me. actually got off the bike and walked out onto the swamp area for a few shots...

374088_2360732130819_1025781561_32111421_1893381293_n.jpg

319265_2360732450827_1025781561_32111422_1753138519_n.jpg

321549_2360732770835_1025781561_32111423_1858177311_n.jpg

Nice capture there CPD.

Jay - Love the 1st and the last one. The simplicity and vibrancy is awesome.

Richie - Cheers man. Those are just randoms I have posted. Hopefully get the blog updated soon. Ah nice shots of the skylines there. I see you been trying that toy look type effect. eg) 6231 and others. Nicely done.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...