Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Why show Star Trek movie when there is racing to show?

Baffling.

And who ever the new flamin mongrel with Martin Brundle is, he needs to drink some battery acid.

+1

He kept cutting in on Martin. He just needs to shut up and let him speak, he could hardly get a word in which is a shame because he actually has insight to what's really going on in the race and doesn't just crap on with obvious stuff that you can see anyway like that other guy...

+1

He kept cutting in on Martin. He just needs to shut up and let him speak, he could hardly get a word in which is a shame because he actually has insight to what's really going on in the race and doesn't just crap on with obvious stuff that you can see anyway like that other guy...

Bring back DC.

In enjoyed the banter between the old school and new school driver.

Both had insights on what racing was like for their generation.

Bring back DC.

In enjoyed the banter between the old school and new school driver.

Both had insights on what racing was like for their generation.

David Croft I think the new guys name is, and he is supposedly the lead commentator and Martin is just there for expert comments.

He is fairly hopeless, mistakes drivers ALL the time which I think is pretty amatuer.

TEN can SABODs

The ONLY issue I can see with the Croft/Brundle commentary is their obvious bias towards Homo and to a lesser extent, Button. Oh, and the issue that we don't get the entire coverage (pre-race, race, post-race) :yucky:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
    • Yep four point harness. Mounted to a bolted in brace running behind the seats. Dont use it for daily driving tbh but good to have for when its needed plus it looks cool.
    • I had to double check the thread title r34 gtt offset advice lol. Thought maybe i posted on the wrong thread. 😂
×
×
  • Create New...