Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

People had been trying anf doing that move all race weekend. It didnt work this time as Maldanado is a bit of a hatchet man and Lewis left him no room, which was silly give he had one and a half laps to go on fried tyres and was going backwards anyway.... I cant lie...i pissed my pants with joy when Hamo ended up in the wall :)

BUT, post race, Hamo was a champ. He wasnt crying wounded victim, he handled the post race really well...so maybe if that attitude continues then I can start to like the guy again

Dan was having a good race until Petrov, which was a shame as he would have ended up 7th or 8th

kimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

schumiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

;)

Jean-Eric Vergne severely penalised for Kovalainen incident in Valencia.

Vergne, who retired from the race on lap 27, was given a 10-place grid penalty for the British Grand Prix and a 25,000 euro fine.

http://www.autosport...t.php/id/100704

Revised world Championship standings, round 8:

Drivers: Constructors:

1. Alonso 111 (1. Red Bull-Renault 176

2. Webber 91 (2. McLaren-Mercedes 137

3. Hamilton 88 (3. Lotus-Renault 126

4. Vettel 85 (4. Ferrari 122

5. Rosberg 75 (5. Mercedes 92

6. Raikkonen 73 (6. Sauber-Ferrari 60

7. Grosjean 53 (7. Williams-Renault 45

8. Button 49 (8. Force India-Mercedes 44

9. Perez 39 (9. Toro Rosso-Ferrari 6

10. Maldonado 29

11. Di Resta 27

12. Kobayashi 21

13. Hulkenberg 17

14. Schumacher 17

15. Senna 16

16. Massa 11

17. Vergne 4

18. Ricciardo 2

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/100705

Schumacher holds onto third.

Accused by Mark Webber of using his DRS under a yellow flag situation, Schumacher had to face the stewards on Sunday evening.

Team boss Ross Brawn was confident he would not face a penalty, telling the BBC that he had ' personally double-checked the data and Schumacher stopped using is 30m before the yellow flag zone so he's confident there won't be a penalty.'

And after examining the evidence the stewards ruled that Schumacher had slowed sufficiently and he retained his third.

http://www.planetf1....i-Holds-Onto-P3

Jean-Eric Vergne has been hit with a 10-place gird drop for the British GP while Kamui Kobayashi will also be demoted.

Kobayashi, has been hit with a five-place grid penalty following his collision with Felipe Massa.

http://www.planetf1....anded-penalties

Hamo isn't just a magnet for it - he created the situation that caused it by pushing overtaking cars off the track when he clearly wasn't going to be able to hold onto the position anyway. How many other passes happened in that exact way all day long? Every other driver managed to get through cleanly, by choosing to allow a car width for the car that was beside them rather than risking a collision by forcing them off the track. Everybody except Hamilton, that is. he chose the 'risk collision' option and got away with bullying the Renault in exactly the same way the lap before, but Maldonardo was just as obstinant as Hamilton and the inevitable happened...

I think its a harsh penalty for Maldonardo.

Hamo isn't just a magnet for it - he created the situation that caused it by pushing overtaking cars off the track when he clearly wasn't going to be able to hold onto the position anyway. How many other passes happened in that exact way all day long? Every other driver managed to get through cleanly, by choosing to allow a car width for the car that was beside them rather than risking a collision by forcing them off the track. Everybody except Hamilton, that is. he chose the 'risk collision' option and got away with bullying the Renault in exactly the same way the lap before, but Maldonardo was just as obstinant as Hamilton and the inevitable happened...

I think its a harsh penalty for Maldonardo.

As much as I wanted to see Williams get a podium - it was Maldanados fault. You just dont rejoin the track and fire into the side of someone. What the shot above doesnt show was that he had four wheels off the circuit - to be honest I was surprised he got away with a 20 second penalty. He has to stop doing stupid sht - Melbourne was bad enough, then Monaco, now this.

he was only off the track because Hamilton forced him off...

unh4i.jpg

if you squeeze someone that hard, you have to realise it comes with a risk of collision.

The whole situation was caused by Hamilton, who had no chance of hanging on to that position anyway.

Edited by hrd-hr30

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...