Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bit of a redbull white wash hey

yap.

p2 Times

01 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:26.221 35 laps

02 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:26.339 0.118 33 laps

03 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:26.820 0.599 34 laps

04 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:27.022 0.801 38 laps

05 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:27.030 0.809 40 laps

06 Lewis Hamilton McLaren 1:27.131 0.910 38 laps

07 Jenson Button McLaren 1:27.182 0.961 24 laps

08 Nico Hulkenberg Force India 1:27.233 1.012 37 laps

09 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:27.397 1.176 36 laps

10 Bruno Senna Williams 1:27.738 1.517 36 laps

11 Paul di Resta Force India 1:28.004 1.783 32 laps

12 Sergio Perez Sauber 1:28.178 1.957 39 laps

13 Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1:28.222 2.001 37 laps

14 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:28.239 2.018 37 laps

15 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:28.296 2.075 23 laps

16 Kamui Kobayashi Sauber 1:28.455 2.234 40 laps

17 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:28.596 2.375 38 laps

18 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:29.167 2.946 35 laps

19 Heikki Kovalainen Caterham 1:29.320 3.099 43 laps

20 Vitaly Petrov Caterham 1:29.606 3.385 22 laps

21 Pedro de la Rosa HRT 1:30.950 4.729 37 laps

22 Timo Glock Marussia 1:31.113 4.892 35 laps

23 Narain Karthikeyan HRT 1:31.372 5.151 20 laps

24 Charles Pic Marussia 1:31.493 5.272 31 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8195861/Vettel-Leads-Red-Bull-1-2-And-Alonso

boring race is going to be boring..

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

An incorrect setting on his Ferrari caused Felipe Massa to struggle with its handling during second practice for the Indian Grand Prix.

The Brazilian, who had been seventh quickest in the morning, spun several times during the second session and was unable to set a proper laptime after damaging his tyres.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/103740

p3 Times

01 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:25.842 20 laps

02 Jenson Button McLaren 1:26.034 0.192 17 laps

03 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:26.108 0.266 18 laps

04 Lewis Hamilton McLaren 1:26.151 0.309 21 laps

05 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:26.209 0.367 22 laps

06 Bruno Senna Williams 1:26.214 0.372 24 laps

07 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:26.521 0.679 15 laps

08 Nico Hulkenberg Force India 1:26.531 0.689 21 laps

09 Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1:26.652 0.810 21 laps

10 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:26.664 0.822 21 laps

11 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:26.691 0.849 13 laps

12 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:27.140 1.298 18 laps

13 Sergio Perez Sauber 1:27.162 1.320 21 laps

14 Paul di Resta Force India 1:27.193 1.351 22 laps

15 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:27.229 1.387 21 laps

16 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:27.374 1.532 21 laps

17 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:27.711 1.869 20 laps

18 Kamui Kobayashi Sauber 1:27.983 2.141 19 laps

19 Heikki Kovalainen Caterham 1:29.035 3.193 20 laps

20 Vitaly Petrov Caterham 1:29.237 3.395 20 laps

21 Timo Glock Marussia 1:29.745 3.903 19 laps

22 Charles Pic Marussia 1:30.298 4.456 20 laps

23 Narain Karthikeyan HRT 1:30.824 4.982 22 laps

24 Pedro de la Rosa HRT 1:30.873 5.031 22 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8197811/Vettel-s-Indian-Practice-Reign-Continues

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is awesome.     
    • Thanks for the quick replies guys its appreciated. A small extension was welded onto the standard 6boost external gate pipe which you can see where the pipe goes from black to stainless just below and to the right of the rear housing in the first picture. Overall I would say the flow is pretty good other than 6boosts choice to come straight off the collector at a decent angle.. Not sure why I went with two valves, I originally replaced the stock twin bovs with the GFB when I had the twins on. When I purchased the EFR it came with the Turbosmart Kompact BOV so I figured that would be a better option than the stock EFR Bov. I don't believe the Turbosmart BOV is adjustable? When I get the spike and then sudden dip in boost pressure, the turbo speed does drop as well. Stock head size wise however I believe it has Neo Turbo springs and a Neo Turbo intake camshaft and an aftermarket exhaust camshaft in the vicinity of 260 degrees. We didn't try a different MAC valve, we tried two different ways of plumbing it and we also tried removing the mac valve entirely and just having the boost source from the turbo directly connected to the wastegate and it still spiked / dropped and exhibited the same behaviour. Standard R33 GTR 5 speed tansmission. I'm running a Haltech Elite 2500 and can provide some logs if you. I understand what you're saying in that it looks like an auto plot however no, it's still a manual and it just has a lot of torque down low, for all intents and purposes it's a very impressive street car. I've attached a photo of the quickbitz dyno plot which was when the only difference is I was running -5 twin turbos with a mac valve. As you can see theres a decent dip in AFRs between 125kmh and 135kmh. Our problem now is not that the AFRs are dropping, just the boost pressure is dropping, however it is evident in the same RPM range of the map, coincidentally or not.
    • What transmission are you running?  It's a bit tricky with the scaling, but at face value the power "curve" looks more like a "line" which is a bit odd... basically a lot more like a dyno plot I'd expect with a highish (compared to a factory auto) stall torque converter type setup. If this is running an auto then this kind of boost control challenge is definitely a thing, the rpm scale on the dyno doesn't reflect what the engine is actually doing (unless the dyno has access to the engine's ACTUAL speed electronically) and what you'll get is a big rpm flare up as the engine torque launches past the converter pump's ability to resist torque at that rpm, then as the converter starts picking up rpm it will kinda even out again and the engine rpm will pick up more steadily. The trick with this "flare up" is if it's kinda near the boost threshold for the turbo then the engine's airflow requirements to maintain the previous boost level will outrun the turbo's ability to supply that boost - so you end up with a natural flattening off, if not dip when that happens.   If you are running closed loop, or even tune the "feed forward" wastegate duty cycle to deal with that rpm spike then when the engine starts settling to a more typical climb you'll actually have a situation where the gate is "too closed" and boost will run away for a bit, then have to pull down again.      It's not trivial to get this perfect as most boost control systems are generally expecting more predictable engine rpm rates of change, but if you *know* that's whats going on then you can at least "accept your fate" and realise getting that area perfect is kinda chasing your tail a bit, and assume that if the rest is working sensibly and the spike/dip isn't completely uncontrolled then you should be good. Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent, but the dyno plot and boost control behaviour look a LOT like what I've seen tuning autos in the past. What ECU are you running? Could possibly be convinced into looking at logs if I get too bored this weekend haha.
    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
    • Photo of manifold showing gate location? I mean, it's 6Boost, so we probably shouldn't be worrying, but always wroth knowing what the layout is. Plumbed back to atmosphere? Or into the dump?
×
×
  • Create New...