Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Um....given that the GTS4 engine is an RB20 that hardly differs from the one in the GTSt (apart from having a different sump with the diff in it), why would you expect the engine accessories to be the same as GTR rather than GTSt? It makes sense for front suspension and other chassis parts to be the same between GTR and GTS4, but not engine parts.

the suspension is NOT gtr neither are the brakes they are gtst, however the power steering pump part numbers match to r32 gtr ones being that it is an rb20 yes however it is an awd rb20 and thus these things have been changed over, don't ask me why they just have, the diffs are also not gtr items they are 4.3's not 4.1's like the gtr. but the engine parts are due to the awd system installed.

my rb30 is fully built, spool rods, cp's 20thou over acl mains and bigs reground .25, cometic head gasket, rb25de head with 100lb springs tomei 256 cams greddy copy intake, hks 600cc's, still thinking about manifold have t4 to4e master power turbo Brazillian thing real deal, awd adaptor plate arp head and mains studs, what else obviously nistune ecu will be getting put in place still looking for good QLD turner for it around bris vegas and still thinking about the clutch as funds are becoming tight. also just installed NEW r32 gtr gearbox. and need new engine mounts thinking of nismo items aswell as nismo thermo, not sure what intercooler to run and need another radiator as i sold it to a mate.

it's not i can take a photo for you tomorrow to suffice the suspension is different,

i have the whole drivers side off right now for the engine conversion, i went to get gtr nismo suspension for it and found it's gtst

Edited by Gts4RB30

Piggaz i agree with you as i work with diesel engines and seen the stroke on them, it's just what i have ascertained through research and other peoples experience??? been told many MANY times to redline it at 7.5k i want to take it to 9k rpm or more personally, with standard crank.

  • 4 weeks later...

ok a couple of things have changed as they do i am now going to use standard balancer and balance the F*ck outta everything, and am now using a low mount gt35r off an xr6, and have since aquired a nistune rb20 ecu but has to be remapped as the guy i bought it off only had it at 173rwkw with gtr injectors and such on rb20det due to mercury tuning it and it blew his engine :(

poor bugger.

one of my major concerns with ecu is the fact that mercury tuned it :-/ how damaged is it going to be and how leaned out is he mixture??????

Dude you can't just put an unknown ECU on your car and hope it will work, great way to pop a motor even if it is a good tune, it is tuned for another car, not yours!!

Get it tuned properly, why even bother getting an ECU if you aren't going to tune it?

You can't expect to buy an ecu and not tune it. You need to put it on a dyno anyway so while you are there you may as well pay for a tune. Not to do so would be very false economy.

oh yeah totally agree. but i am concerned with start up. primarily

trent with the r34 ecu with the IAT tables can you set up air intake ignition and fuel trim? I'd love that feature, not sure if I should just fork out for a vipec and put it in the standard case instead though.

An airflow meter adjust fuel requirements for differences in IAT.

Pretty sure the GTR ecu has IAT correction.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...