Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i think people are confussed it had a full tune for all the bolt ons but for a gt3071 then all he did was change the turbo nothing else still somewhat a full tune

its not like he took his stock turbo off ran a gt42 and turned the boost up

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i think people are confussed it had a full tune for all the bolt ons but for a gt3071 then all he did was change the turbo nothing else still somewhat a full tune

its not like he took his stock turbo off ran a gt42 and turned the boost up

I need to link the facepalms again....

Edited by Cowboy1600

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

I want to see a boost graph, my guess is it's got a whole guts full at 140km/hr

The power to rpm ratio is wores then my 3540 mokup (hypergear atr45) while 160kws short. Looks very lazy and not making much power either. Not a very good turbo.

well there must be something wrong with the tuner/turbo or engine cause it was very close power very close dyno to not much difference at all across the whole board

lets just think its a $400 turbo hg are 1500 so its not a bad power figure for the price

Have you seen a dyno graph for a 3071? That dyno graph up there is disgusting. Sags and flops and makes power at what about 5krpm then falls off all the way to red line. I bet that housing on the turbo will glow red after a couple runs.

If I had to do it all over again, knowing what I know now, I would still go hypergear over this turbo. Keep it for a Civic, a skyline deserves more.

Edited by SargeRX8

yeah i kno but its not mine and not in a skyline his goin to a gt3076 just wanted to do this at a laugh

and i know his dyno graph of the gt3071 i was there and watched it

not goin to name names but the tuner is known for bad tunes he has done a fair few shitty tunes here in melbourne

sayin that he might goto a different tuner and try another power run of a new fresh tune

his 3071 was pretty much the same as the dyno i put up there not much difference at all so giving the 3071 dyno sheets are better then this then it clearly rules out the turbo

so its either engine/ or tuner

i know you want this to be the most awesome turbo in history, but face facts... it isn't.

at this point you cant really say anything about the tune/tuner as it doesn't have one.

yes you DO need to tune for the different turbo, even if it makes similar power. also the kw figure is probably the least important part of the tune, and not the reason we tune cars. it's not how many kw you make, but how you make them

this is what a ~280rwkw turbo on an RB 25 SHOULD look like:

med_gallery_36777_3194_109738.jpg

note the response.

yeah i know what your saying joey , i kno its not the best turbo but what im trying to say with the tuner who tuned his engine using a gt3071 the dyno graph looked excatly the same as the one i posted which seems to tell me its the tuner as it didnt look very good even with the garrett turbo with a full tune

i dont want to name the guy who tuned it but i kno alot of people have had problems with him maybe i should tell my mate to go visit trent and get a REAL tune done

  • 2 weeks later...

i guess thats there opinion as i dont really have one as its not mine i couldnt care less only stating that its still goin strong for a shitty $400 bolt on turbo with no tune

its booked in for a tune next week so i guess we will see what its like

1328700312[/url]' post='6224982']

i guess thats there opinion as i dont really have one as its not mine i couldnt care less only stating that its still goin strong for a shitty $400 bolt on turbo with no tune

its booked in for a tune next week so i guess we will see what its like

Kudos to him for at least giving it a go, after all it's not that often you see proper results of a eBay turbo posted up. It may not be as good as a legit garret, but at least it's making some sort of boost...then technically it's doing what it's meant to do...in saying that though I would have waited for the proper one...and he can't sell it and make any means of profit off it...it's already a cheap turbo, a used eBay one you'd probably have to pay someone to take it away haha...

Nice job anyway. Like others have said a photo of the turbo on the car would be nice...Cheers!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually, that's not entirely true. It's also the same motor in the 1st gen Nissan Cube but they're rare as hen's teeth.  
    • Yeah it is always worth testing and balancing actuators out of the box, just set the pressure regulator on a compressor very low (eg 5 psi) and increase it slowly to see when they both move.....unfortunately while you may be able to adjust the length of the actuator rod to minimise any difference, the actual pressure they move from is not adjustable so you need a well matched pair. And yes, the VCAM is probably contributing; the earlier in the rev range they come on boost and the slower the revs build (I think your demo was in 5th), the more you notice it.  Driving at WOT through 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc you will probably never hear it as any shuffling starts and is over super quickly
    • oh they were with that motor, you need to remove the engine to change the spark plugs (don't have to, but it does make it easier)
    • I certainly fall into the annoyed camp, but glad to hear that if it's happening at low boost then I'm not likely going to blow a turbo and end up with metal shards in my oil. Just feels like it prevents me from really driving it without hesitation and "peak" performance. Wonder if it's the VCAM, it did an impressive job of shifting the torque curve and faster spool, but maybe now it's "too fast" and there's too much air for how open the throttle is.  Based on some other threads, will also do some reading on synchronizing the actuators. They are the default actuators that come on the Garrett's and I would think they would be set the same coming from the factory, but if the turbos don't actually work exactly the same way at the same time as previously mentioned, it would be worth making sure the actuators are actuating together properly
    • I went down this rabbit hole before, ended up sourcing a motor from the UK (I'm in Japan) which also didn't function correctly. With the original motor, I disassembled it and reassembled it and it works somewhat, sometimes. What I could deduce from all my screwing around is that there is calibration of the gears on the inside of the motor and two ramps on the main gear which activate switches that operate the motor and move the sunroof either to retract into the roof or tilt. Where I got stuck was that, it seemed in my case that one or both of the switches that are activated by the ramp on the gear did not always activate and thus the motor did not move, causing it to sometimes not retract or tilt (apologies, I've forgotten which way it didn't work.).  Of course this part is discontinued at Nissan now, it's the same part in the S15 but no other models. I also contacted the manufacturer of the component for schematics - forgot the name, they're based in Gifu - but they declined to share the information due to being bound by an NDA, sadly. Looking through my pictures now, it seems I last had a crack at this in 2022. See, I so kindly wrote "open" and "close" next to the switches. If you figure it out, please do tell me. Those little switches, with the red buttons may need to be replaced.
×
×
  • Create New...