Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I was wondering if High Flowed injectors are always the pintle type?

(so just one hole?)

Also my standard injectors are 4 hole design, would anybody know if they just spray straight, or is there a pattern involved?

The background is:

I came about this seller, and at at least he's honest with his description and offers a return.

Injectors

I asked him via EMail what type of design the injectors are, and he said it is a two hole.

He also mentioned that other vendors have just a one hole design, and his design is superior. (V-Pattern)

By looking at the spray pattern in his ad, I'm under the impression that the stream of fuel is not very much atomized/dispersed.

Is this a misconception?

Thanks for your input :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/389925-injector-spray-pattern-highflowed/
Share on other sites

they are disc type, from what I can figure they just drill out the 4 small holes into 1 big hole. Infact i beleive even the ID injectors just do this with a bosch base.. but it seems newer injectors tend not to lose their spray pattern when doing it unlike the older style..maybe there is more to it I dunno :unsure:

So I would think he is just leaving a bar down the middle when he drills them to split the spray..toyota JZ style sidefeed injectors are a twin hole injector, the theory behind it is that it sprays a seperate stream to each valve..How well this works in an RB I dont know..But I wouldnt expect miracles..

I thought you were going for topfeed anyway?

Hi there,

Thanks for the input.

Yes, the plan is to go top feed.

However I wanted some side feed injectors as a 'backup' should something go wrong with the installation of the

Bosch injectors. (I want to avoid a long downtime, so PLAN B is to mount the sidefeed)

How's your installation going? Did you already run the car?

they are disc type, from what I can figure they just drill out the 4 small holes into 1 big hole. Infact i beleive even the ID injectors just do this with a bosch base.. but it seems newer injectors tend not to lose their spray pattern when doing it unlike the older style..maybe there is more to it I dunno :unsure:

So I would think he is just leaving a bar down the middle when he drills them to split the spray..toyota JZ style sidefeed injectors are a twin hole injector, the theory behind it is that it sprays a seperate stream to each valve..How well this works in an RB I dont know..But I wouldnt expect miracles..

I thought you were going for topfeed anyway?

If you are after highflowed jobs....i would go to "PJ's Quickbits" I can only vouch for him, but i have been running highflowed injectors he did for me for some time and have got very good results.

Will def go to him again when i go to E85.

If you are after highflowed jobs....i would go to "PJ's Quickbits" I can only vouch for him, but i have been running highflowed injectors he did for me for some time and have got very good results.

Will def go to him again when i go to E85.

+1 for PJ's hiflow service.

my rb25 neo injectors were flowed to:

600cc @ 43psi

850cc @ 60psi

Multi hole injectors were intended for each jet from the holes to be aimed at a common point in front of the injector so that they crash into each other and assist with atomisation.

I thought dual hole injectors were intended for dual intake valve heads. Some designs spray the fuel onto the back of each valve head, using the heat of the valve to help fuel atomisation.

I thought dual hole injectors were intended for dual intake valve heads. Some designs spray the fuel onto the back of each valve head, using the heat of the valve to help fuel atomisation.

It seems that there's no hard and fast rules about how the number of holes relates to the spray pattern. I looked here http://www.witchhunter.com/spraypattern1.php4 and found only the 4 hole type shown doing what I said.

Yes, that is my understanding as well.

They spray on the backside of the intake vale, just before it is about to open.

I thought dual hole injectors were intended for dual intake valve heads. Some designs spray the fuel onto the back of each valve head, using the heat of the valve to help fuel atomisation.

But the Bosch EV14 which came with my kit (at the time) are 6 hole (see my pictures)

I also wonder how much impact the injector spray pattern has, since it is always sprayed against the back-side of the intake valve.

Clearly buying side feed and 'dropping' them in produces less mounting downtime. :)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=attach&section=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=376533

I was this close to buying a set of those also. then after a bit more research i came to the conlusion to buy some nismo 550's, being proper quad orofice style -> better atomisation -> better bang -> heavier wallet. :cheers:

Edited by Torques

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...