Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So currently putting a list together on what mods ile be doing to my 25, have a 8g budget im working with too achieve close too 400hp and build my 32 into a drifter, will never be rego'ed again.

currently im going with

definite mods

HyperGear G3 turbo

DW300 in-tank fuel pump

740cc Deatschwerks injectors

Maybe mods

EWP

6boost midmount

Greddy manifold

But im stuck deciding if i should go with E85 or a WMI setup, both have there pros and cons, for me E85 is harder too buy as im in queensland but the power gains and and anti det will be alot more then WMI, but WMI will bring my temps down, engine will run alot cleaner and is easy to get...or run 50/50 E85 and 98ron...hummm

any advice will be appreciated,

Thanks in advance!

Edited by 51NNA
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397600-wmi-or-e85-stuck-on-a-choice/
Share on other sites

you can easily run WMI on E85, but now your talking some serious power lol more than you will push from a G3

for a track dedicated car in a non E85 friendly area, WMI will be easier to make do with.

once E85 is easier to come by you wont be at too much of a loss to retune and on sell the WMI kit. The WMI kits are under $500 for something that will do the job.

Why is E85 hard to get for a track only car in brisbane? There's a caltex at goodna which sells it, you'd go past that on the way to QR. There's also one in ipswich itself, a few over on the bayside and one near mt gravatt.

WMI is a BC E85 or agrestic Oz [where E85 is unavailable] solution. If you have good access to E85 and never travel outside the metro area/s then use it - its cheaper and easier to set up than WMI. For all us erudites unable to take advantage of E85, WMI is the answer.

I think the question that determines which way you go is how often do you drive the car. A lot of k's will mean WMI.

I'd like to see someone try a little straight water with E85. You would spray 1/2 the volume that you would if using a WMI setup for the same power level. Around 400cc for 400kw atw.

The advantage I see is that you could run the E85 tune a lot leaner, into the 12.x:1 range. Which will help a little with fuel economy in the long run. I can't remember exactly, what he told me but Piggaz's car drinks E85 at a pretty alarming rate. Well over 10lt/minute at wide open throttle.

From what I understand about E85 tuning, rich AFR's under full load are needed to help keep detonation at bay and also to keep things from getting too hot. In this way E85 tunes more similar to pure methanol burning engines than ULP.

Im running a Microtech LT12s btw, its going to be a track car so distance isnt that much of an issue, you use around 45% more fuel when your on E85 because to get the same amount of energy from the fuel you require alot more, just like Avgas, i just dont want to have to bring 100LTs of E85 too every drift event lol

Can someone explain how you'd do the 50/50 ethanol mix, does this mean mixing fuel at home from a drum or would you have 2pumps at the servo, one for 98 and one for ethanol?

What kind of gains would you get from 50% mix if your making say 300kw with 98?

id say get 2 20lt drums and put both in your fuel tank, i wouldnt buy e85 from the pump, only the drums, i assume it would be simlar gains too straight E85 but not as much, would also require less fuel then straight E85

just go flex-fuel setup.

Ethanol content sensor

ECU with digital input (Link G4, some of the Haltechs etc)

And get some ID1000's at least, to leave you some headroom if you change your mind. Better injectors anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...