Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Rightio guys.

Just a little build thread thanks to my oil pump destroying itself and taking my engine with it.

A little bit of history of how things were 6 weeks ago;

- GT block

- Tomei 2.8 (86.5 mm pistons)

- "Ported and polish head"

- Tomei Procams (270 @ 10.25mm)

- Garrett -5's with a slightly modified turbine housing

- Tomei Series 1 dumps

- Racepace Motorsport twin 3 inch from dump pipes back

- Link G4 ECU

- ID 2000 injectors

- Nismo 100 mm intercooler

- Nismo intake plenum

- Standard Airbox :3some:

- Ross crank trigger

That setup on Unigroup Engineering's dyno made 426 RWKW at 24 psi dropping off to 22 psi top end.

Dyno graph below:

49b755bf.jpg

OK, so onto the failure.

Oil pump into 9 pieces, lost oil pressure, Exhaust cam welded itself to a few cam caps and pistons and valves got a bit raunchy in the chamber. :wub:. The bottom end somehow survived! The engine was together for 7 years and just on 35,000 KMS.

Picture of the oil pump:

427735_10150581862512337_719527336_9288754_231707328_n.jpg

Drive of the pump.

395910_10150581866647337_719527336_9288791_2004099_n.jpg

All exhaust valves cracked

425872_10150581863187337_719527336_9288760_900070127_n.jpg

Uh huh Uh huh

418911_10150581864762337_719527336_9288774_703799385_n.jpg

Engine oil. Now with glitter and sparkles.

404180_10150581865667337_719527336_9288783_659095642_n.jpg

The valves. The "tapping" that shouldn't have happened :3some:

417326_10150581874222337_1528063720_n.jpg

Big end bearings. Look good for the damage done!

Bigend%20bottom.jpg

OK. Enough of the destruction. Now the fix.

I decided to keep the 2.8 as much I wanted to go 3.0, I couldn't justify moving away from the 2.8 when it was all good.

Over the last 14 months I have been building a head at HKS Japan (Thanks Marcus for all those 2 hour talks and organising this for me). The guy that has built this head also ported the HKS drag R33 GTR back in the day.The spec of this head is;

- "port and polish" for engines up to 900 HP

- JUN Ti retainers

- 1.5 mm oversize valves

- HKS step 2 valve springs

- JUN 264 @ 10.5 mm cams. I was originally going to go with the Mines 252 @ 10.05 mm BUT I may run V-cam at a later stage. They recommend a 264 degree cam for 2530's/-5's, so the choice was made.

- The head also copped the full treatment from NAPREC. This consists of taking one of the squish pads out, reshaping the combustion chamber and decking the head 1.0 mm. (thats the short version of it)

I also had a set of standard manifolds ported to the head and sent a manifold to turbo gasket to Japan to get matched up. The other side a 'balance tube' was sourced (the bit between the throttles and the head) and matched that to the head also.

A few cheeky photo's of the head;

P2110197.jpg

P2110199.jpg

P2110200.jpg

Pistons got ordered this arvo which are 87 mm Tomei pistons which will be valve recessed to suit the 1.5 mm OS valves. As soon as that is done they will be flown over so I can assemble the bottom end, then wait for this head to rock up.

- A racepace 9 Litre sump has been organised to be drained by a Tomei oil pump.

- My gearbox got a quick strip down, inspect and reassemble as we found 2 'locator pads' on the magnet.

- A Quaife front diff has been bought and is going in the sump/diff when I get it.

- Alcon 6 pot 365mm front/4 pot 350 mm brakes are on the car. I'll take some pics tomorrow and throw them up.

I was very surprised with the clutch and how it came out. Anyone that has seen me drive it knows the launches this thing gets. I have done 250 launches atleast since I have owned it and i'm just going to put it back in the car. Love those coppermix Nismo's :wub: .

Keen to see what changes you end up making Paul. Looking at the dyno sheet I should have taken you up on that test drive offer too.

How does the crank journals look? Considering the mains still look reasonable (despite particles), i'd imagine they look ok if the nitriding has held up.

Were you using cut back valve stem's? Just wondering what caused the valves to make contact... Did the belt slip too?

You didn't say what brand of pump that was either...?

Keen to see what changes you end up making Paul. Looking at the dyno sheet I should have taken you up on that test drive offer too.

How does the crank journals look? Considering the mains still look reasonable (despite particles), i'd imagine they look ok if the nitriding has held up.

Were you using cut back valve stem's? Just wondering what caused the valves to make contact... Did the belt slip too?

You didn't say what brand of pump that was either...?

If i wasn't so hungover and struggling from the previous nights stupid decisions I might have had a chance of giving you the keys. It also had no PS belt and on semi's... it was such a prick to drive around town!!!

Crank looks fine. It's polished up and will be reused.

Yeah the belt slipped when the EX cam siezed in the head. The pistons and valves had sexy time because the pistons were not valve relieved and the lift on the cams (10.25 mm)

It was an N1 pump.

It only had to last a few more months. I was going to change it when the head came (which is next month)

Yeah the lack of PS was the main reason I wasn't too keen.

Sucks the pump didn't survive. I don't think there is such a thing as luck with performance cars. You can just count on everything going wrong when you least expect it too.

That head sounds and looks paaaawwwwwnn

Where and how much you get the brakes??

Looking to upgrade soon

England I got them from. A bloke on the pommie site had them on special but have since gone back up. Landed they were about $6000 after getting raped by customs!

I'll post some pics soon.

Yeah the lack of PS was the main reason I wasn't too keen.

Sucks the pump didn't survive. I don't think there is such a thing as luck with performance cars. You can just count on everything going wrong when you least expect it too.

Oh well. Take it for a belt at this years nationals if you're coming down.

England I got them from. A bloke on the pommie site had them on special but have since gone back up. Landed they were about $6000 after getting raped by customs!

I'll post some pics soon.

That's actually quite a good price for front and rears, cant wait to see them on the car

Such a shame it decided to lunch itself Paul.

I remember seeing your ride at unigroup and having a chat to you about it. (I just finished my 33 and brought it down to show the boys)

The new setup sounds even more impressive.

Paul, what did you do with your old brakes? Weren't they big enough? lol

Cant wait to see this up and running again

Nah, couldn't stop the prick at Wakefield (braking before the kink and still having issues).

They went to Milano (Aggroman).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...