Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I no, i mite one day come to like them if I can sort what ever is wrong with the dam things.

Anyone got any sudjustions ?

Any "up, down, up's" in size in the exhaust?

Cam timing?

Tired engine?

I no, i mite one day come to like them if I can sort what ever is wrong with the dam things.

Anyone got any sudjustions ?

Should be bout same as mine as almost same set up , i think should change cam timing to what mine is :)

The exhuast was farked when it made 330rwkw, 2.3inch front pipes into a 3inch catback than went down to 2.5inch in the cannon.

It's now got 3inch tuned length front pipes into a 3.5inch merge. Decat, and I'm just waiting on the 3.5inch tomei ti catback to turn up.

See how it all works out when the new system on bolted up. Than jez can do a full tune on it, cam gears, and all.

It's got type b pon cams.

Azza's made awesome power on the same setup I the same dyno.

His got a forged motor, but my motor is 160 across all 6 so it shouldn't b an issue.

C what happens

The exhuast was farked when it made 330rwkw, 2.3inch front pipes into a 3inch catback than went down to 2.5inch in the cannon.

Not exactly the turbo's fault with the little 5's trying to blow out of that man.

So what's considered responsive with -5's? 1 bar at 3600 rpm?

from memory my rb2630 with -10s made 1bar @ 3krpm, I'd need to dig it up as I posted my results in each gear on gtr UK forum

Not exactly the turbo's fault with the little 5's trying to blow out of that man.

Yea I no, the prob I had was I made up at 4inch system took it back to the dyno and only made 7kw more.

Im just saying -5 on something like your motor is crazy. It deserves a decent turbo. Gunna b awesome!!

Should be bout same as mine as almost same set up , i think should change cam timing to what mine is :)

Next time your under the bonnet man, could u have a look at what yours are set at? Maybe take a pic?

Next time your under the bonnet man, could u have a look at what yours are set at? Maybe take a pic?

Let me know when your back and i will meet you at Jez' s and we will have a look :cheers:

So what's considered responsive with -5's? 1 bar at 3600 rpm?

You won't get that on a 2.6l unless it's fully loaded up :)

On the street it's around 4000-4200rpm in 3rd for a 2.6l if memory serves me correct

u are the first unhappy -5 customer I have heard...am I allowed to ask who is your tuner?

Add me to the list then for street/hill runs/motorkhana stuff the -5s are shithouse on a 2.6l

Cars was significantly faster with the smaller turbos coming on much faster in a on/off throttle scenario as -5s are lazy and need a stroker.

Interesting as I found my other gtr with -5s very responsive. That was a 2.6 as well.

What do u think is a good turbo for the application u refer to above?

Its not a loaded question- just like to hear your opinion.

Well given I've said many times over that I had -9s taken off to put the -5s on (so i can comment on both, unlike most)... Wouldn't say it's particularly difficult to come to such a conclusion :merli:

I've had GTSS, GTRS & -5's on a 2.6ltr (as well as -10s on a 26/30 which Paul has driven).

^ Absolutely you can comment on -9's back2back with -5's as you've had both...really is horses for courses though as I personally found GTSS's way too small (not sure how -9's compare to GTSS though)

I think it depends on the sort of driving you do. Guys that do the 'on/off/on' driving IE hillclimbs, skid pan work and track work will always favour the small stuff.

Steveo overlayed a 2.6 with SS's and my 2.8 with 5's and down low they were pretty much the same. Top end, well we know what happened.

2.6 with -5's is still lethargic, however peoples definitions of being lazy/lethargic/laggy are all different.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...