Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

Not sure if this is the right place to advertise this - let me know if not. Ad is also on 'Whole Cars sale page' with pics etc.

Immaculate R32 GTR for sale

Spent plenty as you do, someone else's chance to enjoy.

333kw (At all Four @ 21 PSI.)

For those that like the detail, let me know and I can provide you with the full list (all internals no expense spared.) Shortened version as per below;

Fully overhauled engine, Balanced and Blue printed (Engine built by Pace Pace Motorsport in Melbourne Tuned by Ed @ Autotech Canberra)

Tomei cams (260-9.15)

Trust high volume sump

Remote oil filter and oil cooler

25/30 parallel HKS Turbos

CES ceramic dump pipes and full high performance exhaust system

Nistune Ecu

HKS Launch Control & torque splitter

Turbo smart eboost

Overhauled gearbox

Excedy triple plate clutch

Koni adjustable suspension

Full customer GTR interior

18 inch Simmons Alta wheels

No money to spend and everything works. Low k's since engine build (has 173,000 on the clock.)

Currently engineered and registered in NSW. All extras and spares supplied with car

Located NSW Far South Coast - Will travel to Canberra for genuine inspection.

$34,900

Reasonable genuine offers considered

post-32547-0-09160100-1420591279_thumb.jpgpost-32547-0-26610600-1420591288_thumb.jpgpost-32547-0-24322700-1420591240_thumb.jpgpost-32547-0-52976600-1420591252_thumb.jpgpost-32547-0-03544100-1420591265_thumb.jpgpost-32547-0-37633700-1420591306_thumb.jpgpost-32547-0-89583200-1420591314_thumb.jpg

post-32547-0-00168200-1420591211_thumb.jpg

post-32547-0-22964000-1420591299_thumb.jpg

post-32547-0-52346200-1420591323_thumb.jpg

Hi Guys,

R32/R33 GTR Apexi Power FC (without Hand controller) $600

2x Z32 AFM (Practically Brand new, done like 2000km) $250 for the pair.

Also still have a set of standard injectors, Standaird Airbox (missing 1 clip) and a set of Apexi pods. PM for more details.

Have an Ogura twin plate clutch here with plenty of meat left on it still. Not using it anymore as I've gone to a quad plate.

Suitable for an R32 GTR.

Don't have the bearing from the centre but they're not that expensive or hard to get. $400, prefer local sale.

Push type

^^ Lots of interest but I still have this and want it gone!

I have some (badly) polished cam covers to suit rb26. Have both cam covers, timing cover, plenum and twin turbo pipe. Dont have a coil pack cover though. Ideally want to see if someone wants a head start instead of polishing theirs. Will swap for painted ones (dont require plenum or twin turbo pipe though). Will get pics when im home in a few weeks if required

god damn why cant it be the passenger side speaker cover!!

Should be able to help you out Nate

Replacing door card in my 32/4 and I'd say the speaker cover will fit

Let you know when it's swapped over

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...