Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

he guys i did a fuel test with my 33gtr on the m1 i was shocked when i found out im using 1litre of fuel every 5km just normal driving i took it took the gold coast a few weeks ago and got 135km to a full tank that was having a few runs and general driving i do have t88 3 fuel pumps and 4" exhaust

out of my semi stock cars(intercooler, exhaust 12psi) i normally get 10 to 11l per hundred. sometimes even 9 on highways. i had a 350kw one that got only 280- 350km out of around 50-55L depending on driving. That didnt stop me getting a smile on my face every time i drove it :yes:

Do a full service, injector cleaner and 02 sensor and see what happens then. A well maintained healty motor stockish car should get to about 10/L

he guys i did a fuel test with my 33gtr on the m1 i was shocked when i found out im using 1litre of fuel every 5km just normal driving i took it took the gold coast a few weeks ago and got 135km to a full tank that was having a few runs and general driving i do have t88 3 fuel pumps and 4" exhaust

id get a new tuner! Unless you were on boost the whole way...

Thought I'd spend the doe and get a compression test done aswell. Booking that in with Pete at rpm.

I'm running 18" wheels with low pros federal/Heros.

I'm thinking it's bc my tank is not 65 ltr as u guys keep saying it is :P. don't ask why, it was like that when I bought her.

Thanks for the replies, several minds are better than 1 so I thought I'd check.

~ash

I don't run mine down under the E, ever :P

and that is why saying "a tank" when talking fuel economy is pointless

as for your tank being smaller, is it actually an aftermarket tank, or is it that you've got an aftermarket fuel pump that hasn't been fitted low enough to allow you full use of the tank?

either way, i'm down to halfway in my tank, done over 400kms, trip computer saying about 500kms left till empty, and even then there will still be 10 to 15L left in the tank. but it's a crappy old commodore with a 75L tank.

Shit dude that's pretty bad. My not be the running of the car, could be something as simple as the sender unit in the tank giving an incorrect reading as well. The wife's 33 doesn't do to bad on fuel considering she only works a short distance from home, usually gets over close to 250k's to half a tank and thats driving back streets. So as you can imagine it's a lot of slow corners and acceleration in short spurts.

While on the subject of fuel economy, took the 32 out to toowoomba the other week, full car, 317kw, and got just under 400km to 3/4 tank. Hasn't been on a desent drive like that before. A few years ago, we use to have some crazy late night runs down the highway towards the NSW border, giving her a really good flog, and made it back to the northside before putting fuel in her. Pete, RPM, really nows how to get the most out of a tune thats for sure.

Shit dude that's pretty bad. My not be the running of the car, could be something as simple as the sender unit in the tank giving an incorrect reading as well. The wife's 33 doesn't do to bad on fuel considering she only works a short distance from home, usually gets over close to 250k's to half a tank and thats driving back streets. So as you can imagine it's a lot of slow corners and acceleration in short spurts.

While on the subject of fuel economy, took the 32 out to toowoomba the other week, full car, 317kw, and got just under 400km to 3/4 tank. Hasn't been on a desent drive like that before. A few years ago, we use to have some crazy late night runs down the highway towards the NSW border, giving her a really good flog, and made it back to the northside before putting fuel in her. Pete, RPM, really nows how to get the most out of a tune thats for sure.

+1 for Pete @ RPM.

My 34 is 360hp at the wheels and I get about 350k around town ( no highway k's ) to a tank. When I do take it on a long trip I get between 500 and 600k's out of a tank depending on how many people are in the care and if I am just cruising.

Thought I'd throw my own experiences in as well, 5 speed R34 GTT sedan getting about 34ok's for a tank of BP 98. Basic mods, cold fed pod filter, 3" turbo back, FMIC, stock ecu, 12psi. Engine and transmission conversion through a number of less than qualified workshops (including 'Nizzpro' when they were at Ashmore). Thought it must have been a wire or 2 not connected as I got the car back and the speedo, air con wasn;t working and was running only 5psi and felt real flat. Turned out was a knock sensor not connected (thanks Chiptorque) Made 164kw and ran a lot better so I thought fuel economy would improve as it was no longer running on a 'safe' tune.

NOPE, 320/340 a tank so no change at all. AFR's continually bounce between 13.5 and 15.8 cruising on the highway (AEM UEGO gauge).

But on a positive some gas rebates still apply and liquid injection technology is getting good gains over petrol.

Thought I'd throw my own experiences in as well, 5 speed R34 GTT sedan getting about 34ok's for a tank of BP 98. Basic mods, cold fed pod filter, 3" turbo back, FMIC, stock ecu, 12psi. Engine and transmission conversion through a number of less than qualified workshops (including 'Nizzpro' when they were at Ashmore). Thought it must have been a wire or 2 not connected as I got the car back and the speedo, air con wasn;t working and was running only 5psi and felt real flat. Turned out was a knock sensor not connected (thanks Chiptorque) Made 164kw and ran a lot better so I thought fuel economy would improve as it was no longer running on a 'safe' tune.

NOPE, 320/340 a tank so no change at all. AFR's continually bounce between 13.5 and 15.8 cruising on the highway (AEM UEGO gauge).

But on a positive some gas rebates still apply and liquid injection technology is getting good gains over petrol.

I can't see where you listed an after market ecu/piggyback?

But sounds like your map is tuned for fuel economy but o2 feedback is still on if its cycling between lean and rich on constant light throttle

If you still have a stock ecu with no mods I don't see how it is tuned?

my S2 33 gtst was getting 600ks per full tank before the light came on. Mods- 10psi, front mount, 3inch turbo back exhaust and a pod.

Put it in got new timing belt and bearings, and a service and now suddenly im getting 500kms max. Ecu is standard so not sure whats happened that with parts in bad need of replacement i was getting more kms.

wonder if its oil related? did you change your oil brand or type? i couldnt possibly see it having that much of a difference. maybe a bit more stick given to the car once everything is in tip top condition? i always love going for a good drive once iv got everything back in tip top shape!

Hey 89CAL, there are no aftermarket/piggy back computers in my car. I meant I had bought a manual 1/2 cut and transferred everything from the cut to my sedan. Computer, some looms, trasmission and so on.

The safe tune I was referring to is similiar to a safe/limp home mode but not as severe. It was caused by the knock sensor not being connected, it really retards the timing and runs on a much more fueled up map.

And I had a quick chat to Lochy at Chiptorque and was suprised the fuel map will cycle back and forth rather than stay as close to 14.7 as conditions allow.

one thing a lot of people overlook is the coolant temp sensor

i use an ecutalk display so i can see whats going on and it gives l/100km too (you just input your injector size and it works it out)

best i've ever seen in the stagea was 9.6 l/100km driving from melb to qld, i think that tank was v-power actually

around the town sees 12-14 so if i can get that fuel consumption in a 1650kg wagon then others should be able to get the same or better from a 1500kg whale

oh, and the guy that has the t88 gtr, i'd get your tuner to tune for low throttle input cos that fuel useage is retarded, unless you were on boost the whole way

Hey 89CAL, there are no aftermarket/piggy back computers in my car. I meant I had bought a manual 1/2 cut and transferred everything from the cut to my sedan. Computer, some looms, trasmission and so on.

The safe tune I was referring to is similiar to a safe/limp home mode but not as severe. It was caused by the knock sensor not being connected, it really retards the timing and runs on a much more fueled up map.

And I had a quick chat to Lochy at Chiptorque and was suprised the fuel map will cycle back and forth rather than stay as close to 14.7 as conditions allow.

ah ok i get it now

sounds like similar situaton to what happens when you set your target AFR higher then what the narrowband can read and it dumps more fuel in to bring it back within range then starts over again. This is with Power FC, when I had o2 feedback on. It wasnt a problem as soon as i turned o2 feedback off, just have to tune the target AFR's

i recently changed the wheels on my vt commodore from the 18's it had on it when i bought it to a set of 15's i had sitting around (hit a rock on the highway and damaged a rim and tyre, so just bought new 15's instead of new 18's and getting the rim fixed). anywho, going from the 18's with 235 tyres to 15's running 205 tyres has knocked about 0.5L/100kms off my fuel usage. i'm now down to under 8.5L/100kms

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...