Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

My thoughts are; even if its 300 per driver, that's still cheaper than losing my license.

And its another off the list.

Closer to home, so food and accomodation would be cheaper(for those who already reside in Sydney).

I'm really keen to try sutton, minus the witches hats.

Don't know if it would be doable or not....

I'm really keen to try sutton, minus the witches hats.

Don't know if it would be doable or not....

I was saying the same thing on Saturday, how awesome to just have the "full" track.

Some of the speeds you'd get up to could make it nasty if you come off, especially after the straight.

Ok you can all forget H.A.R.T.

The staff were very friendly and helpful but the company has some rules which mean we cant go there.

Firstly it's ok on price depending on what you do, full track though (which is what we would do) is 50% more to rent excluding insurance etc than the total cost for Sutton inc insurance. Still, that could be worked around if the others weren't there; residents complaining so zero noise tolerance and the final few nails in the coffin? 80kmh max speed, no oversteer, zero marks on road surface, no timing of any kind allowed.

Yeah Sutton with no cones is possible, and I plan on doing it with a few built GTR mates on a private day - problem is, the speeds will be massive - just MASSIVE and there's not as much run off as you all know compared to a normal track. So as the club we cant run a day like that because if someone crashes (good chance of it) it's a huge headache and means the club cant go back, but a private day where it's a very small group (who pay a hefty fee for entry) where you all know each other it's another story.

I'd really love to get say 3 laps (even 2 would be a plus) in a row on a place like Sutton - if that was the case, some cones to limit speed in the straight and at the start of the big left hander would be fine by me.

yeah someone on the day suggested something like that, groups of 3 or 4 going off for a few hot laps so the tyres get a chance to warm up then sit out for an hour or two till its our turn again.

I would rather one good session than a whole bunch of little episodic ones, worth a trial run anyway..

pity about the issues at St Ives, would be awesome to have a track that close.

lol @ not oversteer..i would be sent home after the first corner :(

Ok you can all forget H.A.R.T.

The staff were very friendly and helpful but the company has some rules which mean we cant go there.

Firstly it's ok on price depending on what you do, full track though (which is what we would do) is 50% more to rent excluding insurance etc than the total cost for Sutton inc insurance. Still, that could be worked around if the others weren't there; residents complaining so zero noise tolerance and the final few nails in the coffin? 80kmh max speed, no oversteer, zero marks on road surface, no timing of any kind allowed.

Good old residents complaining.... People want cars like ours of the street then whinge about the noise? Clowns! :P

Wish i had made Sutton, but i still dont have a car.... Its still in 'Coming Soon" mode unfortunately.... I REALLY hope you run Sutton next year!!!

Yeah Sutton with no cones is possible, and I plan on doing it with a few built GTR mates on a private day - problem is, the speeds will be massive - just MASSIVE and there's not as much run off as you all know compared to a normal track.

I've done it before and as you say it is too dangerous, faster speeds then Wakefield, but with off camber hairpin corners, jumps and no run off area. I think the top of the hill was a bit fast this time around, the cones could have been placed 20m further up the hill for my likings, but i'm a woose.

I've done it before and as you say it is too dangerous, faster speeds then Wakefield, but with off camber hairpin corners, jumps and no run off area. I think the top of the hill was a bit fast this time around, the cones could have been placed 20m further up the hill for my likings, but i'm a woose.

20m further UP the hill.....don't you mean further DOWN the hill? It's already at the top of the crest so you don't have big speed for the jump - or do you mean the chicane just as you exit the canyon?

Yeah Sutton with no cones is possible, and I plan on doing it with a few built GTR mates on a private day - problem is, the speeds will be massive - just MASSIVE and there's not as much run off as you all know compared to a normal track. So as the club we cant run a day like that because if someone crashes (good chance of it) it's a huge headache and means the club cant go back, but a private day where it's a very small group (who pay a hefty fee for entry) where you all know each other it's another story.

If this actually happens, pm me with payment details.

And too much speed on the straight comes down to the driver.

Take the first few laps easy, and work your way up.

slowing it down anyfurther would be ghay

and yes dave i have a love for hitting cones at speed

lol

+1

i was slow enough with the cones, adding more would take me all day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...