Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just had my r34 gtt turbo hi-flowed. It's the op6 rear type witch is a ball bearing turbo. When i got it back it's now a journal type bearing.

Witch type is better Journal or Ball bearing.

The company who did the work are telling me the ball bearing hi-flow turbo will fail, but the journal one will not fail.

Also am i being taken for a ride by the company who did the hi-flow by changeing it to journal type bearing????

Cost was just under $1000 to do the work.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/405668-just-had-my-r34-turbo-hi-flow/
Share on other sites

Just had my r34 gtt turbo hi-flowed. It's the op6 rear type witch is a ball bearing turbo. When i got it back it's now a journal type bearing.

Witch type is better Journal or Ball bearing.

The company who did the work are telling me the ball bearing hi-flow turbo will fail, but the journal one will not fail.

Also am i being taken for a ride by the company who did the hi-flow by changeing it to journal type bearing????

Cost was just under $1000 to do the work.

You will hardly notice the difference between them, stick with the journal, it's easier to rebuild.

What happened to your previous turbo? If the bearings failed and smashed the rear wheel it could be a good idea to make sure the oil feed line isn't blocked.

If the company is one of the reputable turbo reconditioners then you have nothing to worry about. Ball bearing turbos don't seem to be able to handle everything we throw at them but the bush bearing turbos pretty much never fail. Not saying this will be the case for everyone but that is what we have noticed.

There is nothing wrong with journal bearing turbos. Ball bearing is slightly more responsive though.

How does it feel to drive?

Also, under $1000 is cheap

Journal are cheaper to rebuild, but I don't think the stock r34 turbo is a bb though?

Um....that was one of the two main selling points of the turbos used in Skylines (ie things that could be written down the side of the car). Ball bearing and ceramic turbine.

The GTR T28s are plain bearing.

Um....that was one of the two main selling points of the turbos used in Skylines (ie things that could be written down the side of the car). Ball bearing and ceramic turbine.

The GTR T28s are plain bearing.

Well there you go, I stand corrected. Either way, nothing wrong with plain bearing hi flows

what about ceramic coating it?? mine runs alot cooler , do you not let the car cool down after a flogging?

i thought that journal bearings were old technology and dont spool up as early so were not the prefered choice.. if your manifold and housing get that hot then could that be also due to the housing being too small and the exhaust too restrictive causing a build up of backpressure...

Edited by SliverS2

What i was saying was not to shut the engine down straightaway and let it cool down for 1min. insted of 30sec. just had the car out for a drive and it used to come onto boost at 2400rpm now it comes on at 3000+ and hits like a freight train and lights it up in second at only 12psi of boost never did this before so will be very interesting when i get it dyno tuned at EFI Profamance in a week or 2.

Going to run 14psi on street and 18-20 at drags.

Shpuld run an easy 11 second pass now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...