Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lets get soem pics from today going.

sure the guys will fill it out later.

starting with our el presedent

335076_508045569221824_999619525_o.jpg

Russ one of our DECA guns ex drift and now time attack!

185467_4426426258352_1688804776_n.jpg

and last but def not least

Adam Newton in big red

built buy one of our motorsport sponsors Racepace

327682_503743399640009_467718021_o.jpg

we hope they all do well and bring some shiny stuff back to VIC.

more updates as we have them, today was just shake down for most teams and a chance to get to knwo the track.

Tomorrow is serious test

then sat and Sunday are the real deal.

more pics:

547909_513160935366748_847004993_n.jpg

614539_399398633441443_1358953518_o.jpg

277826_471164559567868_1688259750_o.jpg

richo 11th in class after testing

russ 18th in class

newton 5th Open class!!!!

and the other big vic car the chasers evo is 2nd Open class.

319382_10151083391927356_1209098059_n.jpg

up to date timing can be found

http://www.worldtimeattack.com/index.php/live-timing/

Quick overall SAU Summary i did before :)

1:31.536 - 8th Pro Class - Mark Berry / Hi Octane Racing Time Attack R34 GTR

1:34.781 - 10th Pro Class - Steve & the crew at Just Jap Racing

1:35.476 - 5th Open Class - Adam Newton / Big Red Racing / RacePace Motorsport

1:35.661 - 6th Open Class - Mark Berry / Hi Octane Racing

1:39.686 - 18th Open Class - Russell Cunningham

1:41.245 - 3rd Clubsprint Class - Miles Tomaszewski / Whiteline / SAU Trader CRD

1:46.014 - 11th Clubsprint Class - John Richo

Lets not forget the non-skyline owners who are a huge part of the SAU scene & doing exceptionally well.

1:34.226 - 2nd Open Class Chasers Motorworks

1:37.853 - 15th Open Class Andrew Motive Hawkins

Pretty epic efforts from all involved! Hopefully I didnt forget anyone :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...